Literature DB >> 32591022

Long non-coding RNA profiling of pediatric Medulloblastoma.

Varun Kesherwani1, Mamta Shukla2, Don W Coulter3, J Graham Sharp2, Shantaram S Joshi2, Nagendra K Chaturvedi4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medulloblastoma (MB) is one of the most common malignant cancers in children. MB is primarily classified into four subgroups based on molecular and clinical characteristics as (1) WNT (2) Sonic-hedgehog (SHH) (3) Group 3 (4) Group 4. Molecular characteristics used for MB classification are based on genomic and mRNAs profiles. MB subgroups share genomic and mRNA profiles and require multiple molecular markers for differentiation from each other. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are more than 200 nucleotide long RNAs and primarily involve in gene regulation at epigenetic and post-transcriptional levels. LncRNAs have been recognized as diagnostic and prognostic markers in several cancers. However, the lncRNA expression profile of MB is unknown.
METHODS: We used the publicly available gene expression datasets for the profiling of lncRNA expression across MB subgroups. Functional analysis of differentially expressed lncRNAs was accomplished by Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA).
RESULTS: In the current study, we have identified and validated the lncRNA expression profile across pediatric MB subgroups and associated molecular pathways. We have also identified the prognostic significance of lncRNAs and unique lncRNAs associated with each MB subgroup.
CONCLUSIONS: Identified lncRNAs can be used as single biomarkers for molecular identification of MB subgroups that warrant further investigation and functional validation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer biomarkers; Gene expression and pathways; Long non-coding RNA; Pediatric Medulloblastoma; Therapeutic targets

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32591022      PMCID: PMC7318516          DOI: 10.1186/s12920-020-00744-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Genomics        ISSN: 1755-8794            Impact factor:   3.063


Background

Medulloblastoma (MB), the most common pediatric brain tumor, constitutes nearly 20% of newly diagnosed brain tumors in children [1, 2]. Treatment of MB involves radiation therapy, chemotherapy and surgical resection. These strategies have improved the survival by 70–80% but also lead to serious morbidities [3, 4]. MB are classified into four major molecular subgroups as WNT, Sonic hedgehog (SHH), Group 3 and Group 4. The WNT subgroup is least common among all 4 subgroups and present in only 10% of cases. Genetic changes in genes: CTNNB1, DDX3X, SMARCA4 and DKK1 are frequently observed in the WNT subgroup. WNT has the best prognosis among all types of MB. SHH is second most common subgroup with abnormalities in SHH signaling pathway and accounts for ~ 30% of total MB cases. Genetic anomalies in genes: MYCN, GLI1, PTCH1, SUFU, MLL2, SMO, TP53, BCOR1, GAB1, GABRG1 and LDB1 are frequently seen in the SHH subgroup. The SHH subgroup has an intermediate prognosis among MB subgroups. Group 3 is the third most common subgroup with 25% of the total MB cases. Group 3 is mainly MYC-driven and genetic aberrations are seen in genes: MYC, PVT1, OTX2, MLL2, SMARCA4, and CHD7 in this subgroup. The prognosis of the Group 3 is very poor and 5 year overall survival is less than 50%. Group 4 is the most common subgroup of MB and accounts for 35% of total cases. The prognosis of the Group 4 is intermediate and genetic aberrations are commonly present in genes: OTX2, DDX31, CHD7, NCAIP, MYCN, CDK6, GFI1/GFI1B, MLL2, KDM6A, MLL3, and ZMYM3 [5-9]. Molecular markers used for WNT identification are CTNNB1 (nuclear), FLIA, YAP1 and DKK1; for SHH are SFRP1, GLI1, FLIA, YAP1 and GAB1; for Group 3, NPR3; and for Group 4, KCNA1. Identification of new molecular markers for drug targeting, diagnosis and prognosis are important due to need for improved molecular profiling of MB [10]. Long non-coding RNAs (LncRNAs) are RNAs of more than 200 bp in length and can be transcribed from an intergenic region, genic regions or super enhancer regions in the genome. LncRNAs can modulate chromatin structure, gene regulation via interactions with epigenetic modifiers and transcriptional co-factors, and also have post-translation effects via affecting the stability of mRNA or proteins [11, 12]. Deregulated lncRNA expression is associated with many cancers [13]. LncRNA signatures have been used to classify different types of cancer as biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and therapy [14-18]. LncRNAs are secreted in serum, plasma, and CSF in a stable form protected from endogenous RNAase and can be used for non-invasive analysis from patient samples [19, 20]. The role of lncRNA in brain development is well studied [21-26]. However, there is not much known about role of lncRNAs in MB. LncRNA LOXL1-AS1 promotes the proliferation and metastasis of MB by activating the PI3K-AKT pathway [27]. LncRNA CCAT1 promotes cell proliferation and metastasis in human MB by regulating the MAPK pathway [28]. Silencing of ANRIL in MB cell lines significantly lowered cell viability and migration. ANRIL promoted the apoptosis of MB cell lines through miR-323-mediated regulation of BRI3, which activates p38 MAPK, ERK, and AKT as well as the WNT signaling pathway [29]. LINC-NeD125 expression is upregulated in Group 4 MB and after interacting to miRNA-induced silencing complex(MISC), it directly binds to miR-19a-3p, miR-19b-3p and miR-106a-5p. Functionally, LINC-NeD125 acts by sequestering the three miRNAs, which leads to the de-repression of major driver genes (CDK6, MYCN, SNCAIP, and KDM6A) of Group 4 MB [30]. LncRNA CRNDE expression is elevated in MB and knockdown of CRNDE significantly reduced cell proliferation and inhibited colony formation in MB cell lines, Daoy and D341 [31]. In the current study, we have identified the lncRNAs expression profile of pediatric MB subgroups and associated molecular pathways. We have also identified the unique lncRNAs associated with each subgroup.

Methods

We searched the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database for MB related microarray datasets and found two relevant studies, GSE37418 [for pediatric MB subgroups expression data] and GSM1094863, GSM1094864, GSM1094865, GSM1094866, GSM1094867 [for pediatric primary cerebellum expression data from GSE44971] for our analyses. We further used large GSE124814 datasets for the validation of lncRNAs expression profiles of MB subgroups obtained from our original analyses. We selected the age < 18 years as an inclusion criteria for selecting pediatric MB samples. We selected the datasets which used the Affymetrix U133 Plus2 array for probe level RNA expression studies. For data analyses, we first did background correction, normalization (RMA), quality control checks, intensity and batch effect corrections of each dataset. Following that, we did probe level differential analyses of datasets using the limma package (ANOVA with eBayes) with criteria of p < 0.001 and fold change greater than two folds. We then annotated the probe sets with the Affymetrix U133 Plus2 library and filtered out lncRNA genes. The lncRNA gene database used is verified and approved by HGNC. Functional analysis of differentially expressed lncRNAs was done by Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) software from BioRad, Inc. We used default parameters and checked all the node types, all species (except uncharted), and all tissue types for core analysis in IPA.

Results

Differentially expressed lncRNAs in the WNT subgroup and their functional roles

Comparative analyses of WNT MB (N = 8) and normal cerebellum tissue (N = 5) datasets with p < 0.05 and fold changes > 2 provided 199 differentially expressed lncRNAs with approved status. Tables 1 and 2 show the fold change in the top 10 upregulated and downregulated lncRNAs. Heatmap of top 10 upregulated and downregulated lncRNAs is shown in Fig. 1a. The complete list of lncRNAs can be seen in Additional file 1. We found 73% overlap with lncRNAs in validation datasets [WNT N = 31, Control = 5] (Additional file 2). We found all the top 10 upregulated and downregulated lncRNAs present in validation datasets. We mostly see non-overlap in lncRNAs at lower expression values.
Table 1

Top 10 up-regulated lncRNAs in WNT subgroup of MB

Gene SymbolFold ChangeP-valFDR P-val
EMX2OS38.189.01E-144.92E-10
OTX2-AS137.841.14E-093.93E-07
PGM5-AS130.269.54E-091.63E-06
DSCR824.560.00010.0013
LOXL1-AS121.061.03E-081.73E-06
HAND2-AS118.519.37E-073.59E-05
TMEM51-AS116.93.88E-098.82E-07
RMST13.921.14E-078.49E-06
LINC0130511.110.00010.001
PART110.941.89E-050.0003
Table 2

Top 10 down-regulated lncRNAs in WNT subgroup of MB

Gene SymbolFold ChangeP-valFDR P-val
LINC00461−62.391.16E-064.17E-05
MEG3−58.99.41E-073.60E-05
LINC00844−24.940.00030.0024
LINC00643−13.36.95E-060.0001
SOX2-OT−12.130.00030.0024
PEG3-AS1−10.023.49E-071.84E-05
TUNAR−7.722.04E-125.87E-09
MALAT1−7.391.65E-071.10E-05
LINC01105−7.393.77E-050.0005
LINC01351−6.482.24E-050.0003
Fig. 1

a: Heatmap of top 10 upregulated and downregulated lncRNAs in WNT subgroup. Expression value of different lncRNAs was clustered using correlation distance method. b: Differentially expressed lncRNAs in a non-canonical biological network in WNT subgroup. The important nodes in this biological network are CCND1, AKT, SOX2, POU5F1, DNMT3B, and CTNNB1. c: Differentially expressed lncRNAs in another non-canonical biological network in WNT subgroup. The important nodes in this biological network are TP53, MYC, EZH2, and MDM2. Green indicates downregulated and red indicates upregulated lncRNAs

Top 10 up-regulated lncRNAs in WNT subgroup of MB Top 10 down-regulated lncRNAs in WNT subgroup of MB a: Heatmap of top 10 upregulated and downregulated lncRNAs in WNT subgroup. Expression value of different lncRNAs was clustered using correlation distance method. b: Differentially expressed lncRNAs in a non-canonical biological network in WNT subgroup. The important nodes in this biological network are CCND1, AKT, SOX2, POU5F1, DNMT3B, and CTNNB1. c: Differentially expressed lncRNAs in another non-canonical biological network in WNT subgroup. The important nodes in this biological network are TP53, MYC, EZH2, and MDM2. Green indicates downregulated and red indicates upregulated lncRNAs We did functional analysis of differentially expressed (DE) lncRNAs of the WNT subgroup using IPA. We identified different functional parameters involved in this subgroup. MAX (a MYC interacting partner), miR-150, miR-133a, FOLR1, E2F NCAM1, GAS2L3 and ATF5 are the most significantly associated upstream regulators, while cancer, neurogenesis, metastasis and cellular development are the most important biological functions affected in this subgroup (Tables 3 and 4). Heatmap of 5 upstream regulators is shown in supplementary Fig. 1 (Additional file 3). The two most important non-canonical networks enriched with DE lncRNAs are shown in Fig. 1b and c. In networks 1; CCND1, AKT, SOX2, POU5F1, DNMT3B, and CTNNB1, in network 2; TP53, MYC, EZH2, and MDM2 are the central regulators linked with DE lncRNAs.
Table 3

Top 10 upstream regulators involved in DE lncRNAs in WNT subgroup

Upstream RegulatorMolecule TypeP-val of overlapTarget molecules in dataset
MAXtranscription regulator5.53E-03DLEU1,DLEU2
miR-150-5p (and other miRNAs w/seed CUCCCAA)mature microRNA5.54E-03MIAT
miR-133a-3p (and other miRNAs w/seed UUGGUCC)mature microRNA7.38E-03MALAT1
mir-133microRNA9.22E-03MALAT1
FOLR1transporter1.31E-02GAS5,PVT1
E2fgroup1.37E-02DLEU1,DLEU2
ATF5transcription regulator1.47E-02GAS5
NCAM1other1.84E-02MALAT1
mir-150microRNA2.56E-02MIAT
GAS2L3other2.92E-02PVT1
Table 4

Top 10 disease and function identified by IPA from DE lncRNAs in WNT subgroup

CategoriesDiseases or Functions AnnotationP-valActivation z-score
Cellular Development, Cellular Growth and Proliferation, Nervous System Development and FunctionNeurogenesis of nervous tissue cell lines3.38E-06
Cellular MovementCell movement of tumor cell lines1.12E-051.324
Cellular MovementMigration of tumor cell lines1.14E-051.498
Cellular MovementInvasion of tumor cell lines1.55E-041.083
Cell CycleArrest in G0 phase of tumor cell lines3.83E-04
Cancer, Organismal Injury and AbnormalitiesMetastasis of tumor cell lines4.26E-04−0.277
Cell Death and SurvivalCell death of eye cell lines5.07E-04
Cellular MovementMigration of cells6.27E-040.573
Cellular MovementCell movement6.75E-040.453
Cellular MovementMigration of hepatoma cell lines1.34E-03
Top 10 upstream regulators involved in DE lncRNAs in WNT subgroup Top 10 disease and function identified by IPA from DE lncRNAs in WNT subgroup

Differentially expressed lncRNAs in the SHH subgroup and their functional roles

Comparative analyses of the SHH subgroup (N = 10) and normal cerebellum tissue (N = 5) datasets with p < 0.05 and fold change > 2 provided 145 differentially expressed lncRNAs with approved status. Tables 5 and 6 show the fold change in the top 10 upregulated and downregulated lncRNAs. Heatmap of top 10 upregulated and downregulated lncRNAs is shown in Fig. 2a. The complete list of lncRNAs can be seen in Additional file 1. We found 50% overlap with lncRNAs in validation datasets [SHH N = 65, Control = 5] (Additional file 2). We found all the top 10, upregulated and downregulated lncRNAs, present in validation datasets except DLEU2 and PRR34-AS1.
Table 5

Top 10 up-regulated lncRNAs in SHH subgroup of MB

Gene SymbolFold ChangeP-valFDR P-val
NEAT123.480.00030.0022
DLEU213.245.79E-112.41E-08
PRR34-AS18.071.58E-078.49E-06
LINC013558.052.93E-095.15E-07
MIRLET7BHG7.491.79E-079.34E-06
CKMT2-AS16.231.86E-093.59E-07
SLC16A1-AS15.658.13E-085.36E-06
TPT1-AS15.284.44E-083.50E-06
LINC010004.961.10E-081.32E-06
ANP32A-IT14.949.36E-073.07E-05
Table 6

Top 10 down-regulated lncRNAs in SHH subgroup of MB

Gene SymbolFold ChangeP-valFDR P-val
LINC00844−33.361.08E-081.32E-06
MIR124-2HG−28.130.00050.0032
SOX2-OT−13.832.39E-071.15E-05
PEG3-AS1−12.945.12E-083.88E-06
LINC00643−11.763.97E-068.83E-05
HCG11−11.260.00120.0065
RMST−9.430.00360.0155
CCEPR−8.931.49E-064.27E-05
MEG3−8.530.00020.0018
MALAT1−8.252.82E-066.86E-05
Fig. 2

a: Heatmap of top 10 upregulated and downregulated lncRNAs in SHH subgroup. Expression value of different lncRNAs was clustered using correlation distance method. b: Differentially expressed lncRNAs in a non-canonical biological network in SHH subgroup. The important nodes in this biological network are CCND1, TP53, MYC, MALAT1, CTNNB1, and SP1. c: Differentially expressed lncRNAs in another non-canonical biological network in SHH subgroup. The important nodes in this biological network are Histone H3, MDM2, CCNA2, SOX2, POU2F1, SP1, and ESR1. Green indicates downregulated and red indicates upregulated lncRNAs

Top 10 up-regulated lncRNAs in SHH subgroup of MB Top 10 down-regulated lncRNAs in SHH subgroup of MB a: Heatmap of top 10 upregulated and downregulated lncRNAs in SHH subgroup. Expression value of different lncRNAs was clustered using correlation distance method. b: Differentially expressed lncRNAs in a non-canonical biological network in SHH subgroup. The important nodes in this biological network are CCND1, TP53, MYC, MALAT1, CTNNB1, and SP1. c: Differentially expressed lncRNAs in another non-canonical biological network in SHH subgroup. The important nodes in this biological network are Histone H3, MDM2, CCNA2, SOX2, POU2F1, SP1, and ESR1. Green indicates downregulated and red indicates upregulated lncRNAs Functional analysis of DE lncRNAs of SHH MB subgroup using IPA predicts, MAX (a MYC interacting partner), miR-133a, FOLR1, E2F, ATF5, AM1, E2F3, GAS2L3 and ACSL5 as most significantly associated upstream regulators, while cancer, neurogenesis, cell proliferation, metastasis and cellular development are the most important biological functions affected in this subgroup (Tables 7 and 8). Heatmap of 5 upstream regulators is shown in supplementary Fig. 1 (Additional file 3). The two most important non-canonical networks enriched with DE lncRNAs are shown in Fig. 2b and c. In network 1; CCND1, TP53, MYC, MALAT1, CTNNB1, and SP1, in network 2; Histone H3, MDM2, CCNA2, SOX2, POU2F1, SP1, and ESR1 are the central regulators linked with DE lncRNAs.
Table 7

Top upstream regulators involved in DE lncRNAs in SHH subgroup

Upstream RegulatorMolecule TypeP-val of overlapTarget molecules in dataset
MAXtranscription regulator2.74E-03DLEU1,DLEU2
miR-133a-3p (and other miRNAs w/seed UUGGUCC)mature microRNA5.17E-03MALAT1
mir-133microRNA6.46E-03MALAT1
FOLR1transporter6.58E-03GAS5,PVT1
E2fgroup6.85E-03DLEU1,DLEU2
ATF5transcription regulator1.03E-02GAS5
NCAM1other1.29E-02MALAT1
E2F3transcription regulator1.49E-02MALAT1,NEAT1
GAS2L3other2.05E-02PVT1
ACSL5enzyme2.18E-02ST7-AS1
Table 8

Top 10 disease and function identified by IPA from DE lncRNAs in SHH subgroup

CategoriesDiseases or Functions AnnotationP-valActivation z-score
Cellular Development, Cellular Growth and Proliferation, Nervous System Development and FunctionNeurogenesis of nervous tissue cell lines1.79E-06
Cellular Development, Cellular Growth and ProliferationProliferation of kidney cancer cell lines3.01E-06−0.095
Cellular Development, Cellular Growth and ProliferationCell proliferation of tumor cell lines3.90E-040.933
Cellular MovementMigration of carcinoma cell lines5.25E-040.762
Cellular MovementMigration of kidney cancer cell lines6.63E-04
Cellular MovementCell movement of tumor cell lines6.65E-040.751
Cellular MovementMigration of tumor cell lines1.14E-031.033
Cellular Development, Cellular Growth and ProliferationCell proliferation of carcinoma cell lines1.30E-030.277
Cellular Development, Connective Tissue Development and Function, Tissue DevelopmentOsteogenic differentiation of nucleus pulposus cells1.36E-03
Cancer, Gastrointestinal Disease, Organismal Injury and AbnormalitiesStage I colorectal adenocarcinoma1.36E-03
Top upstream regulators involved in DE lncRNAs in SHH subgroup Top 10 disease and function identified by IPA from DE lncRNAs in SHH subgroup

Differentially expressed lncRNAs in the Group 3 subgroup and their functional roles

Comparative analyses of the Group 3 MB (N = 16) and normal cerebellum tissue (N = 5) datasets with p < 0.05 and fold change > 2 provided 149 differentially expressed lncRNAs with approved status. Tables 9 and 10 show the fold change in the top 10 upregulated and downregulated lncRNAs. Heatmap of top 10 upregulated and downregulated lncRNAs is shown in Fig. 3a. The complete list of lncRNAs can be seen in Additional file 1. We found 86% overlap with lncRNAs in validation datasets [Group 3 N = 46, Control N = 5] (Additional file 2). We found all the top 10 upregulated and downregulated lncRNAs in the validation dataset, except NEAT1.
Table 9

Top 10 up-regulated lncRNAs in Group 3 of MB

Gene SymbolFold ChangeP-valFDR P-val
OTX2-AS180.961.03E-141.38E-11
BLACAT124.596.32E-083.32E-06
LINC0034819.060.00130.0077
LINC013559.911.54E-081.09E-06
DLEU28.972.31E-092.49E-07
PGM5-AS17.734.32E-050.0005
NEAT17.270.00820.0315
DSCR86.730.01040.0378
PRR34-AS16.631.37E-063.58E-05
MIRLET7BHG6.320.00040.003
Table 10

Top 10 down-regulated lncRNAs in Group 3 of MB

Gene SymbolFold ChangeP-valFDR P-val
XIST−315.10.00660.0267
MEG3−58.010.00010.0011
SOX2-OT−50.31.15E-141.44E-11
LINC00844−37.66.71E-083.47E-06
MIR100HG−16.611.16E-063.15E-05
HCG11−12.991.93E-050.0003
MIAT−10.360.00020.0016
LINC00461−9.380.0020.0105
LINC00643−9.340.00050.0036
TRHDE-AS1−7.597.27E-096.14E-07
Fig. 3

a: Heatmap of top 10 upregulated and downregulated lncRNAs in Group 3 MB. Expression value of different lncRNAs was clustered using correlation distance method. b: Differentially expressed lncRNAs in a non-canonical biological network in Group 3 MB. The important nodes in this biological network are CCND1, EP300, CREBBP, ESR1, CTNNB1, and PRKCD. c: Differentially expressed lncRNAs in another non-canonical biological network in Group 3 MB. The important nodes in this biological network are Histone H3, TP53, MYC, XIST, and EZH2. Green indicates downregulated and red indicates upregulated lncRNAs

Top 10 up-regulated lncRNAs in Group 3 of MB Top 10 down-regulated lncRNAs in Group 3 of MB a: Heatmap of top 10 upregulated and downregulated lncRNAs in Group 3 MB. Expression value of different lncRNAs was clustered using correlation distance method. b: Differentially expressed lncRNAs in a non-canonical biological network in Group 3 MB. The important nodes in this biological network are CCND1, EP300, CREBBP, ESR1, CTNNB1, and PRKCD. c: Differentially expressed lncRNAs in another non-canonical biological network in Group 3 MB. The important nodes in this biological network are Histone H3, TP53, MYC, XIST, and EZH2. Green indicates downregulated and red indicates upregulated lncRNAs Functional analysis of DE lncRNAs of Group 3 MB using IPA predicted C17orf98, ZNF426, RNF165, FBXO8, CTCF, LAYN, PYGO1, Firre, TSIX and miR-150-5pa as most significantly associated upstream regulators, while activation/inactivation of X-chromosome, cell movement, and metastasis are the most important biological functions affected in this subgroup (Tables 11 and 12). Heatmap of 5 upstream regulators is shown in supplementary Fig. 2 (Additional file 3). The two most important non-canonical networks enriched with DE lncRNAs are shown in Fig. 3b and c. In network 1; CCND1, EP300, CREBBP, ESR1, CTNNB1, and PRKCD, in network 2; Histone H3, TP53, MYC, XIST, and EZH2 are the central regulators linked with DE lncRNAs.
Table 11

Top 10 upstream regulators involved in DE lncRNAs in Group 3 MB

Upstream RegulatorMolecule TypeP-val of overlapTarget molecules in dataset
C17orf98other1.11E-03XIST
ZNF426transcription regulator1.11E-03XIST
RNF165enzyme1.11E-03XIST
FBXO8other1.11E-03XIST
CTCFtranscription regulator2.08E-03TSIX,XIST
LAYNother2.22E-03XIST
PYGO1other2.22E-03XIST
Firreother3.33E-03XIST
TSIXother3.33E-03XIST
miR-150-5p (and other miRNAs w/seed CUCCCAA)mature microRNA3.33E-03MIAT
Table 12

Top 10 disease and function identified by IPA from DE lncRNAs in Group 3 MB

CategoriesDiseases or Functions AnnotationP-valActivation z-score
Gene ExpressionInactivation of mouse X chromosome5.74E-06
Gene ExpressionActivation of mouse X chromosome5.74E-06
Cellular MovementCell movement of tumor cell lines2.36E-050.783
Cellular MovementMigration of tumor cell lines3.60E-050.955
Cell CycleArrest in G0 phase of tumor cell lines1.65E-04
Cellular MovementInvasion of tumor cell lines6.99E-040.495
Cellular MovementCell movement1.30E-030.804
Gene ExpressionImprinting1.31E-03
Cancer, Organismal Injury and AbnormalitiesMetastasis of tumor cell lines1.32E-030.152
Hereditary Disorder, Organismal Injury and AbnormalitiesFamilial skewed X inactivation1.41E-03
Top 10 upstream regulators involved in DE lncRNAs in Group 3 MB Top 10 disease and function identified by IPA from DE lncRNAs in Group 3 MB

Differentially expressed lncRNAs in the Group 4 MB and their functional roles

Comparative analyses of Group 4 MB (N = 39) and normal cerebellar tissue (N = 5) datasets with p < 0.05 and fold change > 2 provided 150 differentially expressed lncRNAs with approved status. Tables 13 and 14 show the fold change in the top 10 upregulated and downregulated lncRNAs. Heatmap of top 10 upregulated and downregulated lncRNAs is shown in Fig. 4a. The complete list of lncRNAs can be seen in Supplementary file 1. We found 82% overlap with lncRNAs in validation datasets [Group 4 N = 95, Control = 5] (Additional file 2). We found all the top 10 upregulated and downregulated lncRNAs in validation datasets.
Table 13

Top 10 up-regulated lncRNAs in Group 4 of MB

Gene SymbolFold ChangeP-valFDR P-val
LINC01419139.780.00470.0175
OTX2-AS160.129.95E-162.03E-13
BLACAT127.671.13E-184.59E-16
DLEU211.582.25E-154.16E-13
LINC013557.092.23E-073.85E-06
MIRLET7BHG7.012.03E-062.55E-05
PRR34-AS16.828.84E-126.11E-10
LINC010006.294.10E-123.13E-10
CKMT2-AS16.195.04E-112.82E-09
MIR99AHG5.279.82E-071.38E-05
Table 14

Top 10 down-regulated lncRNAs in Group 4 of MB

Gene SymbolFold ChangeP-valFDR P-val
XIST− 343.060.02870.0745
SOX2-OT−31.61.90E-132.06E-11
MALAT1−13.085.80E-102.34E-08
LINC00643−11.644.39E-134.32E-11
LINC00844−9.891.26E-050.0001
LRRC75A-AS1−9.531.52E-083.87E-07
MIAT−7.872.15E-109.90E-09
PRKAG2-AS1−7.84.29E-076.75E-06
NR2F1-AS1−5.988.89E-114.63E-09
PEG3-AS1−5.741.92E-084.73E-07
Fig. 4

a: Heatmap of top 10 upregulated and downregulated lncRNAs in Group 4 MB. Expression value of different lncRNAs was clustered using correlation distance method. b: Differentially expressed lncRNAs in a non-canonical biological network in Group 4 MB. The important nodes in this biological network are AR, MYC, XIST, SP1, CCND1, and EZH2. c: Differentially expressed lncRNAs in another non-canonical biological network in Group 4 MB. The important nodes in this biological network are Histone H3, SP1, ESR1, MYC, SOX2, POU5F1, CDH1, and CEBPB. Green indicates downregulated and red indicates upregulated lncRNAs

Top 10 up-regulated lncRNAs in Group 4 of MB Top 10 down-regulated lncRNAs in Group 4 of MB a: Heatmap of top 10 upregulated and downregulated lncRNAs in Group 4 MB. Expression value of different lncRNAs was clustered using correlation distance method. b: Differentially expressed lncRNAs in a non-canonical biological network in Group 4 MB. The important nodes in this biological network are AR, MYC, XIST, SP1, CCND1, and EZH2. c: Differentially expressed lncRNAs in another non-canonical biological network in Group 4 MB. The important nodes in this biological network are Histone H3, SP1, ESR1, MYC, SOX2, POU5F1, CDH1, and CEBPB. Green indicates downregulated and red indicates upregulated lncRNAs Functional analysis of DE lncRNAs of Group 4 MB using IPA predicted C17orf98, ZNF426, RNF165, FBXO8, CTCF, LAYN, PYGO1, Firre, TSIX and miR-150-5pa as most significantly associated upstream regulators, while activation/inactivation of X-chromosomes, cell movement, methylation of DNA and metastasis are the most important biological functions affected in this subgroup (Tables 15 and 16). Heatmap of 5 upstream regulators is shown in supplementary Fig. 2 (Additional file 3). The two important non-canonical networks enriched with DE lncRNAs are shown in Fig. 4b and c. In network 1; AR, MYC, XIST, SP1, CCND1, and EZH2, in network 2; Histone H3, SP1, ESR1, MYC, SOX2, POU5F1, CDH1, and CEBPB are the central regulators linked with DE lncRNAs.
Table 15

Top 10 upstream regulators involved in DE lncRNAs in Group 4 MB

Upstream RegulatorMolecule TypeP-val of overlapTarget molecules in dataset
C17orf98other1.34E-03XIST
ZNF426transcription regulator1.34E-03XIST
RNF165enzyme1.34E-03XIST
FBXO8other1.34E-03XIST
LAYNother2.68E-03XIST
PYGO1other2.68E-03XIST
CTCFtranscription regulator3.03E-03TSIX,XIST
Firreother4.02E-03XIST
TSIXother4.02E-03XIST
miR-150-5p (and other miRNAs w/seed CUCCCAA)mature microRNA4.02E-03MIAT
Table 16

Top 10 disease and function identified by IPA from DE lncRNAs in Group 4 MB

CategoriesDiseases or Functions AnnotationP-valActivation z-score
Cellular MovementCell movement of tumor cell lines4.56E-06−0.938
Gene ExpressionInactivation of mouse X chromosome6.13E-06
Gene ExpressionActivation of mouse X chromosome6.13E-06
Cellular MovementMigration of tumor cell lines6.36E-06−0.877
Gene ExpressionImprinting2.27E-05
Cell Death and SurvivalApoptosis of kidney cancer cell lines3.30E-05
Cancer, Organismal Injury and AbnormalitiesMetastasis of tumor cell lines1.28E-040.555
Cellular MovementInvasion of tumor cell lines1.36E-040.031
Cellular Development, Cellular Growth and ProliferationProliferation of kidney cancer cell lines1.68E-04
DNA Replication, Recombination, and Repair, Gene ExpressionMethylation of DNA1.82E-04
Cell Death and SurvivalCell death of eye cell lines3.08E-04
Top 10 upstream regulators involved in DE lncRNAs in Group 4 MB Top 10 disease and function identified by IPA from DE lncRNAs in Group 4 MB

Prognostic significance of lncRNAs in different subgroups of MB

We used a publicly available dataset GSE85217 (Cavalli dataset) to understand the prognostic significance of DE lncRNAs of different MB subgroups. As shown in Fig. 5, high expression of HAND2-AS1 is associated with poor prognosis in WNT MB. Similarly, low expression of MEG3 in SHH, high expression of DLEU2 and DSCR8 in Group 3 and high expression of DLEU2 and low expression of XIST in Group 4 are associated with poor prognosis in MB (p < 0.05).
Fig. 5

Kaplan Meier survival curves of different lncRNAs expressed in different subgroups of MB (Cavalli dataset) obtained using scan cut-off method on hgserver (https://hgserver1.amc.nl). a: High expression of HAND2-AS1 is associated with poor prognosis in WNT MB. b: Low expression of MEG3 is associated with poor prognosis in SHH MB. c: High expression of DLEU2 and DSCR8 are associated with poor prognosis in Group 3 MB. d: High expression of DLEU2 and low expression of XIST in Group 4 MB are associated with poor prognosis (p < 0.05)

Kaplan Meier survival curves of different lncRNAs expressed in different subgroups of MB (Cavalli dataset) obtained using scan cut-off method on hgserver (https://hgserver1.amc.nl). a: High expression of HAND2-AS1 is associated with poor prognosis in WNT MB. b: Low expression of MEG3 is associated with poor prognosis in SHH MB. c: High expression of DLEU2 and DSCR8 are associated with poor prognosis in Group 3 MB. d: High expression of DLEU2 and low expression of XIST in Group 4 MB are associated with poor prognosis (p < 0.05)

Discussion

LncRNAs are known regulators of gene expression. Disruptions in gene regulatory pathways in cancers dictate the aberrant LncRNAs expression [11-13]. Notably, almost 40% of lncRNAs are aberrantly expressed in the brain-related disorders including brain tumors. However, lncRNA expression profile in MB is largely unexplored. In this study, we have identified the lncRNA expression profile of pediatric MB subgroups and associated molecular pathways. The identified key lncRNAs require further functional validation in vitro and in vivo to explore their potential role in MB subgroup-specific manner. Here, we discuss the known cancer-relevant function of the key lncRNAs identified in MB subgroups. EMX2OS is the most differentially expressed lncRNA in the WNT subgroup. This lncRNA is known to regulate EMX gene expression in the brain development [32, 33]. OTX2-AS1 (antisense strand of the OTX2 gene) is predominantly involved in eye development [34]. High PGM5-AS1 (antisense strand of the PGM5 gene) expression is associated with development and poor prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) [35]. Increased expression of DSCR8 is associated to malignant pathology and poor survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients [36]. LOXL1-AS1 (antisense strand of the LOXL1 gene) is involved in the progression and metastasis of MB by regulating the PI3K-AKT signaling [27]. In addition, it is also known to play roles in the proliferation and survival of prostate cancer (PC) cells via miR-541-3p and cell cycle gene CCND1 [37] as well as aggressive nature of glioblastoma by activating NF-kB pathway [38]. HAND2-AS1 (antisense strand of the HAND2 gene) is overexpressed in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) [39] while it is downregulated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells [40]. TMEM51-AS1 (antisense strand of the TMEM51 gene) is associated with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) [41]. RMST acts as a tumor suppressor in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) by inducing apoptosis and inhibiting proliferation/invasion and migration [42]. PART1 promotes gefitinib-resistance in ESCC by regulating the miR-129/Bcl-2 pathway [43] and also associated with PC tumorigenesis [44]. LINC00461 is involved in glioma tumorigenesis via MAPK/ERK and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways [45]. Downregulation of MEG3 is involved in the proliferation and apoptosis of PC cells by regulating miR-9-5p and its target gene QKI-5 [46]. Downregulation of LINC00844 is associated with poor clinical outcomes and suppressed tumor progression/metastasis in PC [47]. SOX2-OT is overexpressed and promotes tumorigenesis by upregulating SOX2 gene and activating PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) [48]. SOX2-OT is also a prognostic biomarker for osteosarcoma (OS) and involved in cell survival and cancer stem cells [49]. TUNAR plays a tumor suppressive role in glioma cells by upregulating miR-200a and inhibiting Rac1 [50]. MALAT1 promotes the chemo-resistance of cervical cancer via BRWD1-PI3K/AKT pathway [51]. MALAT1 is a well-studied lncRNA in several solid and hematological cancers [52]. NEAT1 is overexpressed in most cancer types, except leukemia and myeloma, where it is down-regulated [53-55]. DLEU2 exhibits role in the proliferation and survival of laryngeal cancer cells via miR-16-1 [56]. DLEU2 is also significantly overexpressed in gastric cancer and contributes to cell proliferation [57]. TPT1-AS1 (antisense strand of the TPT1 gene) expression is upregulated in cervical cancer and has influence on proliferation and migration [58]. HCG11 is significantly overexpressed in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and genetic-silencing of HCG11 in HCC cells leads to decreased proliferation [59]. HCG11 expression is downregulated in PC and associated with poor prognosis of patients [60]. CCEPR contributes significantly in promoting cell proliferation and inhibiting apoptosis in bladder cancer [61]. BLACAT1 is overexpressed in chemo-resistant NSCLC and induces autophagy by regulating miR-17 and ATG7 pathway [62]. It also triggers proliferation/survival by regulating WNT signaling in cervical cancer [63]. XIST is elevated in bladder cancer and inhibits p53 function via binding to TET1 [64]. XIST also binds to miR-34a and elicits proliferation and tumor development in thyroid cancer [65]. XIST is an important regulator of progression and oxaliplatin-resistance in malignant melanoma [66]. MIR100HG is known to be involved in cetuximab-resistance in CRC via the β-catenin cellular pathway [67]. In addition, elevated expression of MIR100HG is correlated with poor prognosis of osteosarcoma [68]. MIAT is overexpressed in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) and associated with poor prognosis [69]. MIAT associates with miR-133 and contributes a role in the progression pancreatic cancer development [70]. MIAT also plays a key role in CRC tumorigenesis via miR-132/Derlin-1 axis [71]. NR2F1-AS1 (antisense strand of the NR2F1 gene) promotes chemotherapy-resistance in HCC by regulating miR-363-ABCC1 drug-transporter pathway [72].

Conclusions

We propose that the majority of DE lncRNAs in MB might have oncogenic properties as seen in other cancers (Supplementary Table S1 in Additional file 3) [73-82]. We found approximately 25% of these DE lncRNAs in MB are tumor suppressive. Also, each MB subgroup has unique and common lncRNAs in their expression profile (Fig. 6). We performed a unique lncRNAs analysis in both original datasets and validation datasets (Additional files 1 and 2). Unique lncRNAs can be validated for differential diagnosis and prognosis of MB subgroups. Common lncRNAs and associated molecules in pathways can be important therapeutic targets. We identified important lncRNAs DELU2, CASC15, LINC01355 and GAS5 are present in each subgroup and can be further explored for functional analyses in different MB subgroups. We also found SOX2, Protein kinase C delta (PRKCD), and EZH2 associated with functional networks of each subgroup and could be important drug targets. We also identified the prognostic significance of lncRNAs in different subgroups of MB.
Fig. 6

Venn diagram shows unique and overlapping lncRNAs profile in different MB subgroups. A complete list of unique lncRNAs in each subgroup can be viewed in supplementary file (highlighted in purple in Additional file 1)

Venn diagram shows unique and overlapping lncRNAs profile in different MB subgroups. A complete list of unique lncRNAs in each subgroup can be viewed in supplementary file (highlighted in purple in Additional file 1) Additional file 1. Additional file 2. Additional file 3.
  82 in total

1.  Investigation of circulating lncRNAs in B-cell neoplasms.

Authors:  Mustafa Isin; Emre Ozgur; Guven Cetin; Nilgun Erten; Melih Aktan; Ugur Gezer; Nejat Dalay
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.786

2.  ELK1-induced upregulation of long non-coding RNA MIR100HG predicts poor prognosis and promotes the progression of osteosarcoma by epigenetically silencing LATS1 and LATS2.

Authors:  Xiaochuan Su; Junyan Teng; Guoguo Jin; Jitian Li; Zhenjiang Zhao; Xiangyang Cao; Yanxing Guo; Malong Guo; Xiaoling Li; Jun Wu; Chuanzhen Wang; Zhiping Guo; Qing Guo
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 6.529

3.  Long noncoding RNA X-inactive specific transcript promotes malignant melanoma progression and oxaliplatin resistance.

Authors:  Bujian Pan; Xiaohua Lin; Li Zhang; Weilong Hong; Yi Zhang
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 4.  Mechanisms of Long Non-coding RNAs in Mammalian Nervous System Development, Plasticity, Disease, and Evolution.

Authors:  James A Briggs; Ernst J Wolvetang; John S Mattick; John L Rinn; Guy Barry
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Novel mutations target distinct subgroups of medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Giles Robinson; Matthew Parker; Tanya A Kranenburg; Charles Lu; Xiang Chen; Li Ding; Timothy N Phoenix; Erin Hedlund; Lei Wei; Xiaoyan Zhu; Nader Chalhoub; Suzanne J Baker; Robert Huether; Richard Kriwacki; Natasha Curley; Radhika Thiruvenkatam; Jianmin Wang; Gang Wu; Michael Rusch; Xin Hong; Jared Becksfort; Pankaj Gupta; Jing Ma; John Easton; Bhavin Vadodaria; Arzu Onar-Thomas; Tong Lin; Shaoyi Li; Stanley Pounds; Steven Paugh; David Zhao; Daisuke Kawauchi; Martine F Roussel; David Finkelstein; David W Ellison; Ching C Lau; Eric Bouffet; Tim Hassall; Sridharan Gururangan; Richard Cohn; Robert S Fulton; Lucinda L Fulton; David J Dooling; Kerri Ochoa; Amar Gajjar; Elaine R Mardis; Richard K Wilson; James R Downing; Jinghui Zhang; Richard J Gilbertson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Identification of key lncRNAs in colorectal cancer progression based on associated protein-protein interaction analysis.

Authors:  Haishan Zhu; Jiajing Yu; Haifeng Zhu; Yusheng Guo; Shengjie Feng
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 2.754

7.  lncRNA MIR100HG-derived miR-100 and miR-125b mediate cetuximab resistance via Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Lu; Xiaodi Zhao; Qi Liu; Cunxi Li; Ramona Graves-Deal; Zheng Cao; Bhuminder Singh; Jeffrey L Franklin; Jing Wang; Huaying Hu; Tianying Wei; Mingli Yang; Timothy J Yeatman; Ethan Lee; Kenyi Saito-Diaz; Scott Hinger; James G Patton; Christine H Chung; Stephan Emmrich; Jan-Henning Klusmann; Daiming Fan; Robert J Coffey
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 8.  Involvement of the long noncoding RNA NEAT1 in carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Christiane Klec; Felix Prinz; Martin Pichler
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 6.603

9.  LncRNA NR2F1-AS1 regulates hepatocellular carcinoma oxaliplatin resistance by targeting ABCC1 via miR-363.

Authors:  Hai Huang; Jie Chen; Cheng-Ming Ding; Xin Jin; Ze-Ming Jia; Jian Peng
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 5.310

10.  Long non-coding RNA TPT1-AS1 promotes cell growth and metastasis in cervical cancer via acting AS a sponge for miR-324-5p.

Authors:  Hui Jiang; Guanqun Huang; Nianzhang Zhao; Ting Zhang; Mengni Jiang; Yueming He; Xinke Zhou; Xianhan Jiang
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-07-25
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  LncmiRHG-MIR100HG: A new budding star in cancer.

Authors:  Yingnan Wu; Zhenzhen Wang; Shan Yu; Dongzhe Liu; Litao Sun
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 5.738

2.  Abnormal expression and methylation of PRR34-AS1 are associated with adverse outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Fang-Yu Nan; Yu Gu; Zi-Jun Xu; Guo-Kang Sun; Jing-Dong Zhou; Ting-Juan Zhang; Ji-Chun Ma; Jia-Yan Leng; Jiang Lin; Jun Qian
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 3.  Subgroup-Specific Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Predictive Markers Influencing Pediatric Medulloblastoma Treatment.

Authors:  Sutapa Ray; Nagendra K Chaturvedi; Kishor K Bhakat; Angie Rizzino; Sidharth Mahapatra
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-28

4.  Identification of Potential lncRNAs and miRNAs as Diagnostic Biomarkers for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning.

Authors:  Fei Yang; Jie Zhang; Baokun Li; Zhijun Zhao; Yan Liu; Zhen Zhao; Shanghua Jing; Guiying Wang
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.257

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.