Literature DB >> 31370051

3D bioprinting of mature bacterial biofilms for antimicrobial resistance drug testing.

Evita Ning1, Gareth Turnbull, Jon Clarke, Fred Picard, Philip Riches, Marc Vendrell, Duncan Graham, Alastair W Wark, Karen Faulds, Wenmiao Shu.   

Abstract

The potential to bioprint and study 3D bacterial biofilm constructs could have great clinical significance at a time when antimicrobial resistance is rising to dangerously high levels worldwide. In this study, clinically relevant bacterial species including Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were 3D bioprinted using a double-crosslinked alginate bioink to form mature bacteria biofilms, characterized by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and fluorescent staining. Solid and porous bacteria-laden constructs were reproducibly bioprinted with thicknesses ranging from 0.25 to 4 mm. We demonstrated 3D bioprinting of thicker biofilms (>4 mm) than found in currently available in vitro models. Bacterial viability was excellent in the bioprinted constructs, with CLSM observation of bacterial biofilm production and maturation possible for at least 28 d in culture. Importantly, we observed the complete five-step biofilm life cycle in vitro following 3D bioprinting for the first time, suggesting the formation of mature 3D bioprinted biofilms. Bacterial growth was faster in thinner, more porous constructs whilst constructs crosslinked with BaCl2 concentrations of above 10 mM had denser biofilm formation. 3D MRSA and MSSA biofilm constructs were found to show greater resistance to antimicrobials than corresponding two-dimensional (2D) cultures. Thicker 3D E. coli biofilms had greater resistance to tetracycline than thinner constructs over 7 d of treatment. Our methodology allowed for the precise 3D bioprinting of self-supporting 3D bacterial biofilm structures that developed biofilms during extended culture. 3D biofilm constructs containing bacterial biofilms produce a model with much greater clinical relevance compared to 2D culture models and we have demonstrated their use in antimicrobial testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31370051     DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab37a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  7 in total

Review 1.  Biofilms: Formation, Research Models, Potential Targets, and Methods for Prevention and Treatment.

Authors:  Yajuan Su; Jaime T Yrastorza; Mitchell Matis; Jenna Cusick; Siwei Zhao; Guangshun Wang; Jingwei Xie
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 17.521

2.  Bacterial Growth, Communication, and Guided Chemotaxis in 3D-Bioprinted Hydrogel Environments.

Authors:  Julia Müller; Anna C Jäkel; Jonathan Richter; Markus Eder; Elisabeth Falgenhauer; Friedrich C Simmel
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 10.383

Review 3.  Perspectives on Existing and Novel Alternative Intravaginal Probiotic Delivery Methods in the Context of Bacterial Vaginosis Infection.

Authors:  Priyadarshini Chandrashekhar; Farnaz Minooei; Wenndy Arreguin; Mohammadali Masigol; Jill M Steinbach-Rankins
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Scientometric Analysis of Two Decades of Progress.

Authors:  Sara Cristina Pedroza-González; Marisela Rodriguez-Salvador; Baruc Emet Pérez-Benítez; Mario Moisés Alvarez; Grissel Trujillo-de Santiago
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2021-04-20

Review 5.  Hydrogel Properties and Their Impact on Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Adam Chyzy; Marta E Plonska-Brzezinska
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Emergent Biological Endurance Depends on Extracellular Matrix Composition of Three-Dimensionally Printed Escherichia coli Biofilms.

Authors:  Srikkanth Balasubramanian; Kui Yu; Diana Vasquez Cardenas; Marie-Eve Aubin-Tam; Anne S Meyer
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 5.110

7.  Tomographic Imaging and Localization of Nanoparticles in Tissue Using Surface-Enhanced Spatially Offset Raman Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Matthew E Berry; Samantha M McCabe; Sian Sloan-Dennison; Stacey Laing; Neil C Shand; Duncan Graham; Karen Faulds
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 10.383

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.