| Literature DB >> 31368813 |
Nir Eyal1, Jonathan Kimmelman2, Lisa G Holtzman3, Marc Lipsitch4.
Abstract
This article informally reviews key research ethics guidelines and regulations, academic scholarship, and research studies and finds wide variety in how they consider risk to bystanders in medical research (namely, non-participants whom studies nevertheless place at risk). Some of these key sources give no or very little consideration to bystanders, while others offer them the utmost protection (greater than they offer study participants). This unsettled frontier would benefit from a deeper investigation of the ethics of protecting research bystanders.Entities:
Keywords: Research ethics; bystander; clinical ethics; clinical trials; human research subject protection; research nonparticipant; third party consent
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31368813 PMCID: PMC6742522 DOI: 10.1177/1740774519862783
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Trials ISSN: 1740-7745 Impact factor: 2.486