| Literature DB >> 31368639 |
Tian-Shuang Wang1, Qing-Zhu Liu2, Ming Liu1,2, Qian Zhang1,2, Ruo-Fan Wang2, Chong-Wei Wu2, Jie Zhang1, Wen Wang2, Tao-Yun Ji1,2, Xiao-Yan Liu2, Shuang Wang2, Li-Xin Cai2, Yu-Wu Jiang1,2, Ye Wu1,2.
Abstract
AIMS: To investigate clinical characteristics and surgery outcomes of young children with focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) type II.Entities:
Keywords: epileptic encephalopathy; focal cortical dysplasia type II; neurodevelopment; surgical outcomes; young children
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31368639 PMCID: PMC6978260 DOI: 10.1111/cns.13205
Source DB: PubMed Journal: CNS Neurosci Ther ISSN: 1755-5930 Impact factor: 5.243
Clinical features related to history of epileptic encephalopathy, developmental level, and surgery outcomes (Data were showed n (%) or median (range))
| Total (n = 112) | History of EE | Seizure outcomes | Development before surgery | Developmental outcomes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without (n = 98) | With (n = 14) | Seizure‐free (n = 99) | Seizure ongoing (n = 13) | Normal/mild delay (n = 57) | Moderate/severe delay (n = 55) | Improvement (n = 4) | Stable (n = 44) | ||
| Age at onset (y) | 0.9 (0.01‐5.9) | 1.2 (0.01‐5.9) | 0.4 (0.03‐1.5)a | 0.9 (0.01‐5.9) | 0.9 (0.1‐5.8) | 1.7 (0.01‐5.8) | 0.6 (0.01‐5.9)f | 1.6 (0.44‐2.8) | 0.5 (0.01‐5.9) |
| Seizure frequency (n/day) | 5 (0.1‐50) | 5.3 (0.1‐50) | 3.3 (0.3‐25) | 4.5 (0.1‐35) | 7 (1‐50) | 4.5 (0.1‐25) | 6.0(0.1‐50) | 2.9 (0.2‐23) | 7.3 (0.3‐50) |
| Age at surgery (y) | 4.1 (0.8‐16.2) | 4.2 (0.8‐16.2) | 2.0 (1.2‐6.6)b | 4.2 (0.8‐16.2) | 3.3 (1.2‐14.1) | 4.5 (0.8‐14.2) | 3.9 (0.8‐16.2) | 4.7 (4.1‐6.8) | 2.8 (0.8‐7.3) |
| Exposure duration (y) | 2.3 (0.3‐14.3) | 2.5 (0.3‐14.3) | 1.7 (0.5‐5.2) | 2.5 (0.3‐14.3) | 2.2 (1.0‐9.4) | 2.3 (0.3‐12.2) | 2.3 (0.4‐14.3) | 2.8 (2.0‐6.2) | 2.1 (0.4‐6.3) |
| Numbers of AEDs | 5 (2‐12) | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | 4 (2‐8) | 5 (2‐12)g | ‐ | ‐ |
| Development before surgery | |||||||||
| Normal/mild delay | 57 (50.9) | 55 (56.1) | 2 (14.3)c | 54 (54.5) | 3 (23.1) | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| Moderate/severe delay | 55 (49.1) | 43 (43.9) | 12 (85.7) | 45(45.5) | 10 (76.9)e | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| History of EE | |||||||||
| Without | 98 (87.5) | ‐ | ‐ | 88 (88.9) | 10 (76.9) | 55 (96.5) | 43 (78.2) | 4 (100) | 32 (72.7%) |
| With | 14 (12.5) | ‐ | ‐ | 11 (11.1) | 3 (23.1) | 2 (3.5) | 12 (21.8)h | 0 | 12 (27.3) |
| Seizure types | |||||||||
| Focal seizures only | 78 (69.6) | ‐ | ‐ | 70 (70.7) | 8 (61.5) | 45 (78.9) | 33 (60) | ||
| Other seizures | 34 (30.4) | ‐ | ‐ | 29 (29.3) | 3 (38.5) | 12 (21.1) | 22 (40)i | ||
| Interictal EEG discharges | |||||||||
| Ipsilateral | 98 (87.5) | 86 (87.8) | 12 (85.7) | 87 (87.9) | 11 (84.6) | 51 (89.5) | 47 (85.5) | ||
| Bilateral | 14 (12.5) | 12 (12.2) | 2 (14.3) | 12 (12.1) | 2 (15.4) | 6 (10.5) | 8 (14.5) | ||
| Ictal EEG | |||||||||
| Ipsilateral | 101 (90.2) | 93 (94.9) | 8 (57.1) | 88 (88.9) | 13 (100) | 53 (93) | 48 (87.3) | ||
| Bilateral | 11 (9.8) | 5 (5.1) | 6 (42.9)d | 11 (11.1) | 0 | 4 (7) | 7 (12.7) | ||
| The extent of lesions | |||||||||
| Single lobes | 84 (75) | 76 (77.6) | 8 (57.1) | 75 (75.8) | 9 (69.2) | 42 (73.7) | 42 (76.4) | 4 (100) | 31 (70.5) |
| Multiple lobes | 28 (25) | 22 (22.4) | 6 (42.9) | 24 (24.2) | 4 (30.8) | 15 (26.3) | 13 (23.6) | 0 | 13 (29.5) |
| Histopathology | |||||||||
| FCD IIa | 36 (32.1) | 29 (29.6) | 7 (50.0) | 30 (30.3) | 6 (46.2) | 17 (29.8) | 19 (34.5) | 1 (25) | 16 (36.4) |
| FCD IIb | 76(67.9) | 69 (70.4) | 7 (50.0) | 69 (69.7) | 7 (53.8) | 40 (70.2) | 36 (65.5) | 3 (75) | 28 (63.6) |
Statistical analysis included Mann‐Whitney test, Kaplan‐Meier survival analysis, and Pearson chi‐square test with Fisher's exact test, as appropriate.
Abbreviation: y, years; AED, antiepileptic drug; EE, epileptic encephalopathy; EEG, electroencephalograph; MRI, Magnetic resonance imaging; FCD, focal cortical dysplasia
(a‐d) Comparison between without/with epileptic encephalopathy, if P < .05: a P = .001, b P = .001, c P = .003, d P = .001.
(e) Comparison between seizure‐free group and seizure ongoing group, if P < .05: e P = .032.
(f‐i): Comparison between the two preoperatively developmental level group, if P < .05: f P < .001, g P < .001, h P = .003, i P = .029.
Figure 1Neuroimages and EEGs in two patients. a‐d, FCD IIb in a boy with onset age of 1.8 y. (a) Focal signal hyperintensity and blurring of gray‐white matter in left frontal area was shown on T2FLAIR image (red arrow). (b) The region with lower metabolism was presented on coregistration image. (c) The interictal EEG showed sharp waves and sharp slow waves in left frontal areas (red arrow). (d) Focal seizures with left frontal onset on ictal EEG were monitored (red arrow). e‐h, FCD IIa in a boy with onset age of 7 months. In frontal lobe, burring of gray‐white matter on T2FLAIR image (e, red arrow) and lower metabolism on coregistration image (f) were showed. (g) The interictal EEG showed spikes, sharp waves and sharp slow waves in left frontal and temporal areas (red arrow). (h) Generalized spasm was monitored on ictal EEG. (The blue waveforms represented the left side, and the red represented the right side.)