| Literature DB >> 31366159 |
Shuwu Zhang1, Bingliang Xu2, Yantai Gan3.
Abstract
Salt stress is one of the major abiotic stresses limiting crop growth and productivity worldwide. Species of Trichoderma are widely recognized for their bio-control abilities, but little information is regarding to the ability and mechanisms of their promoting plant growth and enhancing plant tolerance to different levels of salt stress. Hence, we determined (i) the role of Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 (TL-6) in promoting wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seed germination and seedling growth under different levels of salt stress, and (ii) the mechanisms responsible for the enhanced tolerance of wheat to salt stress by TL-6. Wheat seeds treated with or without TL-6 were grown under different levels of salt stress in controlled environmental conditions. As such, the TL-6 treatments promoted seed germination and increased the shoot and root weights of wheat seedlings under both non-stress and salt-stress conditions. Wheat seedlings with TL-6 treatments under different levels of NaCl stress increased proline content by an average of 11%, ascorbate 15%, and glutathione 28%; and decreased the contents of malondialdehyde (MDA) by an average of 19% and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) 13%. The TL-6 treatments induced the transcriptional level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging enzymes, leading to the increases of glutathione s-transferase (GST) by an average of 17%, glutathione peroxidase (GPX) 16%, ascorbate peroxidase (APX) 17%, glutathione reductase (GR) 18%, dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR) 5%. Our results indicate that the beneficial strain of TL-6 effectively scavenged ROS under NaCl stress through modulating the activity of ROS scavenging enzymes, regulating the transcriptional levels of ROS scavenging enzyme gene expression, and enhancing the nonenzymatic antioxidants in wheat seedling in response to salt stress. Our present study provides a new insight into the mechanisms of TL-6 can activate the enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidant defense systems and enhance wheat seedling tolerance to different levels of salt stress at physiological, biochemical and molecular levels.Entities:
Keywords: Trichoderma spp.; different levels of salt stress; gene expression; plant growth promotion; reactive oxygen species; scavenging enzymes; wheat seedling
Year: 2019 PMID: 31366159 PMCID: PMC6696296 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20153729
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Effect of the strain Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 on wheat seed germination at the different NaCl solutions.
| Treatment | Salt Concentrations | Germination Rate | Germination Potential | Germination Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 96.0 ± 1.2a | 89.0 ± 1.2a | 74.2 ± 0.7a | |
| 10 | 83.3 ± 1.4b | 65.0 ± 1.2c | 52.2 ± 1.2c | |
| 20 | 68.3 ± 1.7d | 51.3 ± 1.4e | 40.2 ± 0.7e | |
| Sterile water | 0 | 93.3 ± 1.2a | 82.0 ± 1.2b | 68.1 ± 1.2b |
| 10 | 78.0 ± 2.3c | 61.3 ± 0.8d | 44.9 ± 1.2d | |
| 20 | 63.3 ± 1.2e | 47.0 ± 1.2f | 38.0 ± 1.7e |
Data are means ± standard error of replicates, and the germination rate, potential and index were determined 5, 3 and 5 days after treatment, respectively. Different letters in the same column denote significant differences at the p < 0.05 level by Duncan’s new multiple range test (n = 12). In the three TL-6 treatments, wheat seeds were presoaked with the suspension of Trichoderma longibrachiatum (TL-6) spores for 12 h, whereas in the three sterile water treatments, wheat seeds were presoaked with sterile water only.
Figure 1Effect of the strain Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 on wheat seedling growth after treated with NaCl solutions, with (A) wheat seed plumule length and (B) radicle length. The line bars represent the standard errors of the means. Different letters denote significant difference at the p < 0.05 level by Duncan’s new multiple range test (n = 12). The treatments are detailed in the footnote of Table 1.
Effect of the strain Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 on wheat seedling growth at the different NaCl solutions.
| Treatment | Salt Concentration | Shoot Length | Root Length | Fresh Weight | Dry Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 31.24 ± 0.7a | 24.79 ± 0.6a | 0.47 ± 0.01a | 0.14 ± 0.02a | |
| 10 | 31.05 ± 0.7a | 22.55 ± 0.5b | 0.43 ± 0.01ab | 0.11 ± 0.01abc | |
| 20 | 28.67 ± 0.5b | 21.58 ± 0.4c | 0.34 ± 0.02c | 0.09 ± 0.01bc | |
| Sterile water | 0 | 28.55 ± 0.6b | 22.24 ± 0.3b | 0.41 ± 0.02b | 0.12 ± 0.01ab |
| 10 | 27.43 ± 0.6bc | 20.21 ± 0.5c | 0.35 ± 0.02c | 0.09 ± 0.02bc | |
| 20 | 24.22 ± 0.4c | 18.65 ± 0.4d | 0.29 ± 0.02d | 0.07 ± 0.01c |
Data are mean ± standard error of replicates, and the shoot and root length, fresh and dry weights of wheat seedling were determined 35 days after treatment. Different letters in the same column denote significant differences at the P<0.05 level by Duncan’s new multiple range test (n = 12). The treatments are detailed in the footnote of Table 1.
Effect of Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 on MDA, H2O2 and proline contents in wheat seedlings under salt stress.
| Treatment | Salt Concentration | MDA Content | H2O2 Content | Proline Content |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 9.29 ± 0.6d | 5.84 ± 0.24d | 12.28 ± 1.2c | |
| 10 | 11.46 ± 1.0c | 6.57 ± 0.26cd | 15.58 ± 0.9a | |
| 20 | 12.35 ± 0.8b | 6.75 ± 0.27bc | 15.46 ± 0.7a | |
| Sterile water | 0 | 10.88 ± 0.9c | 6.50 ± 0.27cd | 11.21 ± 1.1d |
| 10 | 14.78 ± 1.0ab | 7.43 ± 0.27ab | 13.93 ± 1.0c | |
| 20 | 15.33 ± 0.7a | 8.07 ± 0.12a | 14.01 ± 0.9b |
Data are means ± standard error of replicates and those in a column followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05, based on Duncan’s new multiple range test using two-way ANOVA (n = 12). The treatments are detailed in the footnote of Table 1. FW represents fresh weight.
Effect of Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 on the contents of glutathione and ascorbate in wheat seedling leaves under salt stress.
| Treatment | Salt Concentration | Glutathione | Ascorbate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.99 ± 0.05cd | 0.88 ± 0.02a | |
| 10 | 1.24 ± 0.04b | 0.75 ± 0.02b | |
| 20 | 1.46 ± 0.05a | 0.64 ± 0.02c | |
| Sterile water | 0 | 0.85 ± 0.01e | 0.83 ± 0.01a |
| 10 | 0.92 ± 0.04de | 0.65 ± 0.02c | |
| 20 | 1.11 ± 0.05c | 0.52 ± 0.03d |
Data are means ± standard error of replicates and those in a column followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05, based on Duncan’s new multiple range test using two-way ANOVA (n = 12). The treatments are detailed in the footnote of Table 1.
Figure 2Effect of Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 on the activity of (A) GST, (B) GPX, (C) APX, (D) GR and (E) DHAR in wheat seedling leaves under salt stress. The line bars represent the standard errors of the means. Different letters denote significant difference at the p < 0.05 level by Duncan’s new multiple range test (n = 12). The treatments are detailed in the footnote of Table 1.
Figure 3Effect of Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 on the expression of (A) GST, (B) GPX, (C) APX, (D) GR and (E) DHAR genes in wheat seedling leaves under salt stress. The line bars represent the standard errors of the means. Different letters denote significant difference at the p < 0.05 level by Duncan’s new multiple range test (n = 12). The treatments are detailed in the footnote of Table 1.
DNA sequences of qRT-PCR primers for the determination of the ROS scavenging enzyme gene expression in wheat seedlings.
| Genes | Premiers Sequence (5′-3′) |
|---|---|
|
| F: AAAACCACCTACTGCCACCCTATC |
| R: AGCATTCGCTCCATGACTCAACT | |
|
| F: AGCTCTTGGCGTCTTGGCT |
| R: AGGCTTCCCCTTGGAGCAC | |
|
| F: CCTAACTAACTCCAACTACACC |
| R: TCCTGCCCACCAAACTGAT | |
|
| F: ATGAATACTCCCGTACATCAGT |
| R: TTTGTTACATCACCCACAGC | |
|
| F: AGAAGTTTACGCCCTTCGGC |
| R: ACAAGTGATGGAGTTGGGT | |
|
| F: CCGTGGTGATGTTGTGCCAAAGGA |
| R: CGACGACACTGGTGGAGTTGGAGA |
Note: F represents forward, R represents reverse.