| Literature DB >> 31364278 |
Brian H Lee1, Geoffrey Kelly1, Shermineh Bradford1, Melanie Davila1, Xinzheng V Guo1, El-Ad David Amir2, Emily M Thrash3, Michael D Solga4, Joanne Lannigan4, Brian Sellers5, Julian Candia5, John Tsang5, Ruth R Montgomery6, Stanley J Tamaki7, Tara K Sigdel7, Minnie M Sarwal7, Lewis L Lanier8, Yuan Tian9, Cheryl Kim10, Denise Hinz10, Bjoern Peters9,11, Alessandro Sette9,11, Adeeb H Rahman1,12.
Abstract
Mass cytometry is a powerful tool for high-dimensional single cell characterization. Since the introduction of the first commercial CyTOF mass cytometer by DVS Sciences in 2009, mass cytometry technology has matured and become more widely utilized, with sequential platform upgrades designed to address specific limitations and to expand the capabilities of the platform. Fluidigm's third-generation Helios mass cytometer introduced a number of upgrades over the previous CyTOF2. One of these new features is a modified narrow bore sample injector that generates smaller ion clouds, which is expected to improve sensitivity and throughput. However, following rigorous testing, we find that the narrow-bore sample injector may have unintended negative consequences on data quality and result in lower median and higher coefficients of variation in many antibody-associated signal intensities. We describe an alternative Helios acquisition protocol using a wider bore injector, which largely mitigates these data quality issues. We directly compare these two protocols in a multisite study of 10 Helios instruments across 7 institutions and show that the modified protocol improves data quality and reduces interinstrument variability. These findings highlight and address an important source of technical variability in mass cytometry experiments that is of particular relevance in the setting of multicenter studies.Entities:
Keywords: CyTOF; Reproduciblity; immune monitoring; immunology; mass cytometry; variability
Year: 2019 PMID: 31364278 PMCID: PMC6750971 DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.23866
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cytometry A ISSN: 1552-4922 Impact factor: 4.355