Kristofor Yap1, Evan N Cohen1, James M Reuben1, Joseph D Khoury2. 1. Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, MS-072, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. 2. Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, MS-072, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. jkhoury@mdanderson.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Circulating tumor cells represent rare events in the peripheral blood of patients with cancer that can provide insight into tumor biology. CTC enumeration, isolation, and analysis represent liquid biopsy approaches whose role in the management of patients with cancer continues to evolve in the era of precision medicine. This review presents an overview of technologies central to studying CTCs. RECENT FINDINGS: Technologies for CTC isolation can be divided into two categories: label-dependent and label-independent. Label-dependent techniques utilize biological properties such as cell surface proteins, while label-independent techniques utilize distinctive physical properties such as cell size, density, and plasticity. Advances in microfluidics designs as well as hybrid combinations of label-dependent and label-independent techniques have resulted in unprecedented improvements in CTC isolation, permitting not only the detection and enumeration of these rare events but also providing the means for studying them and exploring them as a new dimension of cancer biomarkers. With advances in tools for isolating and studying CTCs in hand, questions regarding the clinical utility of CTC enumeration in peripheral blood, detection of CTC-associated biomarkers, and analysis of dynamic changes in CTCs during the course of cancer therapy represent exciting new opportunities for cancer research.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Circulating tumor cells represent rare events in the peripheral blood of patients with cancer that can provide insight into tumor biology. CTC enumeration, isolation, and analysis represent liquid biopsy approaches whose role in the management of patients with cancer continues to evolve in the era of precision medicine. This review presents an overview of technologies central to studying CTCs. RECENT FINDINGS: Technologies for CTC isolation can be divided into two categories: label-dependent and label-independent. Label-dependent techniques utilize biological properties such as cell surface proteins, while label-independent techniques utilize distinctive physical properties such as cell size, density, and plasticity. Advances in microfluidics designs as well as hybrid combinations of label-dependent and label-independent techniques have resulted in unprecedented improvements in CTC isolation, permitting not only the detection and enumeration of these rare events but also providing the means for studying them and exploring them as a new dimension of cancer biomarkers. With advances in tools for isolating and studying CTCs in hand, questions regarding the clinical utility of CTC enumeration in peripheral blood, detection of CTC-associated biomarkers, and analysis of dynamic changes in CTCs during the course of cancer therapy represent exciting new opportunities for cancer research.
Authors: Massimo Cristofanilli; G Thomas Budd; Matthew J Ellis; Alison Stopeck; Jeri Matera; M Craig Miller; James M Reuben; Gerald V Doyle; W Jeffrey Allard; Leon W M M Terstappen; Daniel F Hayes Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-08-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Volkmar Müller; Sabine Riethdorf; Brigitte Rack; Wolfgang Janni; Peter A Fasching; Erich Solomayer; Bahriye Aktas; Sabine Kasimir-Bauer; Klaus Pantel; Tanja Fehm Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2012-08-15 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Scott L Carter; Kristian Cibulskis; Elena Helman; Aaron McKenna; Hui Shen; Travis Zack; Peter W Laird; Robert C Onofrio; Wendy Winckler; Barbara A Weir; Rameen Beroukhim; David Pellman; Douglas A Levine; Eric S Lander; Matthew Meyerson; Gad Getz Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Johann S de Bono; Howard I Scher; R Bruce Montgomery; Christopher Parker; M Craig Miller; Henk Tissing; Gerald V Doyle; Leon W W M Terstappen; Kenneth J Pienta; Derek Raghavan Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-10-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Evan N Cohen; Gitanjali Jayachandran; Max R Hardy; Ananya M Venkata Subramanian; Xiangtian Meng; James M Reuben Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 3.240