Literature DB >> 31363891

Minimally invasive tele-mentoring opportunity-the mito project.

Jose Quezada1, Pablo Achurra1, Cristian Jarry1, Domenech Asbun2, Rodrigo Tejos1, Martín Inzunza1, Gabriel Ulloa3, Andres Neyem3, Carlos Martínez1, Carlo Marino1, Gabriel Escalona1, Julian Varas4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Simulation training is a validated method for acquiring laparoscopic skills. Training sessions may be sporadic or lack continuity in oversight by instructors since traditional programs mandate in-person teaching and evaluation. This study presents the development, implementation, and results of a novel smartphone application that enables remote teacher-student interaction. This interface is used to complete a validated program that provides learner-specific feedback. Outcomes of training via Lapp were compared to outcomes of traditional in-person training.
METHODS: A web-based and mobile iOS and Android application (Lapp) was developed to enable a remote student-teacher interaction. Instructors use Lapp to assess video recorded training sessions of students at distant locations and guide them through the laparoscopic skill course with specific and personalized feedback. Surgical trainees at two remote training centers were taught using Lapp. A control group was assessed during traditional simulation training at the training facility, with in-person feedback. Pre- and post-training performances were video recorded for each trainee and blindly evaluated by two experts using a global rating scale (GRS) and a specific rating scale (SRS).
RESULTS: A total of 30 trainees were trained via Lapp and compared with 25 locally taught. Performance in the Lapp group improved significantly after the course in both GRS and SRS scores, from 15 [6-17] to 23 [20-25], and from 12 [11-15] to 18 [15-20], respectively. The results between both groups were comparable.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic simulation training using a mobile app is as effective as in-person instruction in teaching advanced laparoscopic surgical skills. Lapp provides an effective method of teaching through simulation remotely and may allow expansion of robust simulation training curriculums.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Simulation training; Surgical education technology; Tele-mentoring; Tele-proctoring; Tele-simulation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31363891     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07024-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  33 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a multicenter, prospective, risk-adjusted analysis from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Matthew M Hutter; Sheldon Randall; Shukri F Khuri; William G Henderson; William M Abbott; Andrew L Warshaw
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Laparoscopic vs open surgery: a preliminary comparison of quality-of-life outcomes.

Authors:  V Velanovich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Effects of work hour reduction on residents' lives: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kathlyn E Fletcher; Willie Underwood; Steven Q Davis; Rajesh S Mangrulkar; Laurence F McMahon; Sanjay Saint
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  An evaluation of the feasibility, validity, and reliability of laparoscopic skills assessment in the operating room.

Authors:  Rajesh Aggarwal; Teodor Grantcharov; Krishna Moorthy; Thor Milland; Pavlos Papasavas; Aristotelis Dosis; Fernando Bello; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship: results of a survey of fellowship program directors.

Authors:  Samer G Mattar; Adnan A Alseidi; Daniel B Jones; D Rohan Jeyarajah; Lee L Swanstrom; Ralph W Aye; Steven D Wexner; José M Martinez; Sharona B Ross; Michael M Awad; Morris E Franklin; Maurice E Arregui; Bruce D Schirmer; Rebecca M Minter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Sim one, do one, teach one: considerations in designing training curricula for surgical simulation.

Authors:  Nicoleta O Kolozsvari; Liane S Feldman; Melina C Vassiliou; Sebastian Demyttenaere; Michael L Hoover
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 7.  Laparoscopic vs open D2 gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhen-Hong Zou; Li-Ying Zhao; Ting-Yu Mou; Yan-Feng Hu; Jiang Yu; Hao Liu; Hao Chen; Jia-Ming Wu; Sheng-Li An; Guo-Xin Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  A global Delphi consensus study on defining and measuring quality in surgical training.

Authors:  Pritam Singh; Rajesh Aggarwal; Boris Zevin; Teodor Grantcharov; Ara Darzi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 9.  Restricting resident work hours: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

Authors:  Adam Peets; Najib T Ayas
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Simulation to enhance patient safety: why aren't we there yet?

Authors:  Rajesh Aggarwal; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  10 in total

1.  Remote and asynchronous training network: from a SAGES grant to an eight-country remote laparoscopic simulation training program.

Authors:  María Inés Gaete; Francisca Belmar; Matías Cortés; Adnan Alseidi; Domenech Asbun; Valentina Durán; Gabriel Escalona; Pablo Achurra; Ignacio Villagrán; Fernando Crovari; Fernando Pimentel; Julián Varas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Mentoring in Pediatric Thoracoscopy: From Theory to Practice.

Authors:  Francesco Macchini; Ernesto Leva; Valerio Gentilino; Anna Morandi; Steven Scot Rothenberg
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 3.  Auditorium of the future: e learning platform.

Authors:  Hasan F Batirel; Jalal Assouad; Harry Etienne; Xavier Benoit D'Journo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  A new approach for the acquisition of trauma surgical skills: an OSCE type of simulation training program.

Authors:  Catalina Ortiz; Javier Vela; Caterina Contreras; Francisca Belmar; Ivan Paul; Analia Zinco; Juan Pablo Ramos; Pablo Ottolino; Pablo Achurra; Nicolas Jarufe; Adnan Alseidi; Julian Varas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic using virtual basic laparoscopic training in Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia: effects on confidence, knowledge, and skill.

Authors:  Constance S Harrell Shreckengost; Alexandra Reitz; Erica Ludi; Raúl Rojas Aban; Lorena Jáuregui Paravicini; Federico Serrot
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Face-to-face versus distance learning of basic suturing skills in novice learners: a quantitative prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Ahmad Zaghal; Charles Marley; Salim Rahhal; Joelle Hassanieh; Rami Saadeh; Arwa El-Rifai; Taha Qaraqe; Martine ElBejjani; Rola Jaafar; Jamal J Hoballah
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.263

7.  Artificial intelligence in laparoscopic simulation: a promising future for large-scale automated evaluations.

Authors:  Francisca Belmar; María Inés Gaete; Gabriel Escalona; Martín Carnier; Valentina Durán; Ignacio Villagrán; Domenech Asbun; Matías Cortés; Andrés Neyem; Fernando Crovari; Adnan Alseidi; Julián Varas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.453

8.  Home Surgical Skill Training Resources for Obstetrics and Gynecology Trainees During a Pandemic.

Authors:  Sarah Hoopes; Truce Pham; Fiona M Lindo; Danielle D Antosh
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 7.623

Review 9.  Overcoming the Impact of COVID-19 on Surgical Mentorship: A Scoping Review of Long-distance Mentorship in Surgery.

Authors:  Layne N Raborn; Jeffrey E Janis
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.891

10.  Mobile applications in medical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Viji Pulikkel Chandran; Athira Balakrishnan; Muhammed Rashid; Girish Pai Kulyadi; Sohil Khan; Elsa Sanatombi Devi; Sreedharan Nair; Girish Thunga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.