| Literature DB >> 31363333 |
Branka Bedenić1, Ranko Ladavac1, Mirna Vranić-Ladavac1, Nada Barišić1, Natalie Karčić1, Katherina Bernadette Sreter1, Slobodan Mihaljević1, Luka Bielen1, Haris Car1, Nataša Beader1.
Abstract
Phenotypic detection of metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) in Acinetobacter (A.) baumannii is a serious challenge to clinical microbiologists. MBLs are inhibited by metal chelators such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) (EDTA). Production of MBLs cannot be recognized based on resistance phenotype. Therefore, phenotypic tests using EDTA are recommended. The aim of this study was to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of inhibitor based tests (EDTA) for detection of MBL. A total of 172 A. baumannii strains (123 carbapenemase positive and 49 carbapenemase negative) were analyzed. Phenotypic detection of MBLs was performed by the combined disk test with EDTA (CDT-EDTA) and EPI-dilution test (EPI-DT). Both tests were positive in all 11 isolates possessing VIM-1 MBL, showing 100% sensitivity. However, false positive results were observed in strains with class D carbapenemases using both tests, i.e. all OXA-23 and OXA-24/40 producing organisms and most OXA-58 positive strains (77% with CDT-EDTA vs. 65% with EPI-DT). False positive results can occur because oxacillinases are converted to a less active state in the presence of EDTA, leading to augmentation of the inhibition zone around the carbapenem disk or reduction of carbapenem minimum inhibitory concentrations. This study showed high sensitivity but low specificity of phenotypic methods in the detection of MBLs.Entities:
Keywords: Acinetobacter baumannii; Beta-lactamases; Edetic acid; Imipenem; Meropenem
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31363333 PMCID: PMC6629212 DOI: 10.20471/acc.2019.58.01.15
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Clin Croat ISSN: 0353-9466 Impact factor: 0.932
Number and percentage of positive isolates in dilution and disk method with imipenem or meropenem for metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) positive strains (true positive), carbapenem-hydrolyzing class D carbapenemases (CHDL) producing strains (false positive) and carbapenemase negative strains. Reduction of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and increase of the inhibition zone in the presence of EDTA is shown (range and median)
| Type of carbapenemase | Number of positive strains /number of strains tested* n (%) | Range of imipenem MIC (mg/L) reduction (X-fold) † | Number of positive strains /number of strains tested n (%) | Range of meropenem MIC (mg/L) reduction (X-fold) † | Number of positive strains /number of strains tested‡ n (%) | Range of inhibition zone enlargement (mm) around the imipenem disk (median) | Number of positive strains /number of strains tested‡ n (%) | Range of inhibition zone enlargement (mm) around the meropenem disk (median) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIM+OXA-23 | 11/11 (100%) | 16->64 (32) | 11/11 (100%) | 16-256 (64) | 11/11 (100%) | 8-15 (13) | 11/11 (100%) | 12-18 (16) |
| OXA-23 | 16/16 (100%) | 8-32 (16) | 16/16 (100%) | 8-64 (16) | 16/16 (100%) | 8-16 (11) | 16/16 (100%) | 9-17 (13) |
| OXA-24/40 | 74/74 (100%) | 4->128 (16) | 74/74 (100%) | 8-256 (16) | 74/74 (100%) | 8-17 (14) | 74/74 (100%) | 8-17 (15) |
| OXA-58 | 15/22 (68%) | 4->128 (48) | 15/22 (68%) | 4-512 (32) | 17/22 (77%) | 4-18 (10.5) | 16/22 (73%) | 5-19 (13) |
| Carbapenemase negative | 1/49 (2%) | 0-4 (2) | 1/49 (2%) | 0-8 (4) | 4/49 (8%) | 0-10 (5) | 5/49 (10%) | 0-8 (5) |
*broth microdilution method with imipenem as indicator; †EDTA and 1,10-phenanthroline; ‡combined disk test with imipenem or meropenem disk as indicator