Literature DB >> 31362932

Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.

Masato Matsuura1,2, Hiroshi Murata1, Yuri Fujino1, Mieko Yanagisawa1, Yoshitaka Nakao3, Kana Tokumo3, Shunsuke Nakakura4, Yoshiaki Kiuchi3, Ryo Asaoka5.   

Abstract

AIMS: Corvis ST (CST) yields biomechanical corrected IOP (bIOP) which is purported to be less dependent on biomechanical properties. In our accompanied paper, it was suggested that the repeatability of bIOP is high. The purpose of the current study was to assess the relationship between intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with CST and central corneal thickness (CCT) and corneal hysteresis (CH), in comparison with IOP measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and the ocular response analyzer (ORA).
METHODS: A total of 141 eyes from 141 subjects (35 healthy eyes and 106 glaucomatous eyes) underwent IOP measurements with GAT, CST and ORA. The relationships between IOP measurements (ORA-IOPg, ORA-IOPcc, CST-bIOP and GAT IOP) and biomechanical properties (CCT, CH and corneal resistance factor (CRF)) were analysed using the linear regression analysis.
RESULTS: IOPg, IOPcc and GAT IOP were significantly associated with CCT (p<0.001), whereas bIOP was not significantly associated with CCT (p=0.19). IOPg, bIOP and GAT IOP were significantly associated with CH (IOPg: p<0.001; bIOP: p<0.001; GAT IOP: p=0.0054), whereas IOPcc was not significantly associated with CH (p=0.18). All of IOP records were associated with CRF (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: The bIOP measurement from CST is independent from CCT, but dependent on CH and CRF. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  glaucoma

Year:  2019        PMID: 31362932     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of Corvis ST tonometer with the updated software in glaucoma practice.

Authors:  Ioannis Halkiadakis; Vasilios Tzimis; Alexandros Gryparis; Ioannis Markopoulos; Vasiliki Konstadinidou; Elias Zintzaras; Michalis Tzakos
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 2.  Glaucoma and biomechanics.

Authors:  Babak N Safa; Cydney A Wong; Jungmin Ha; C Ross Ethier
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.761

3.  Assessment of corneal biomechanics, tonometry and pachymetry with the Corvis ST in myopia.

Authors:  Xiaorui Wang; Colm McAlinden; Hongbing Zhang; Jie Yan; Dan Wang; Wei Wei; Shengjian Mi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Corneal Biomechanics for Ocular Hypertension, Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma, and Amyloidotic Glaucoma: A Comparative Study by Corvis ST.

Authors:  Nisa Silva; André Ferreira; Pedro Manuel Baptista; Ana Figueiredo; Rita Reis; Isabel Sampaio; João Beirão; Riccardo Vinciguerra; Pedro Menéres; Maria João Menéres
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-08

5.  The short-term effects of wearing swimming goggles on corneal biomechanics.

Authors:  Raimundo Jiménez; Rubén Molina; Jesús Vera; Beatriz Redondo
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 2.029

6.  Age distribution and associated factors of cornea biomechanical parameter stress-strain index in Chinese healthy population.

Authors:  Guihua Liu; Hua Rong; Ruxia Pei; Bei Du; Nan Jin; Di Wang; Chengcheng Jin; Ruihua Wei
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  Association of Corneal Biomechanics Properties with Myopia in a Child and a Parent Cohort: Hong Kong Children Eye Study.

Authors:  Shu-Min Tang; Xiu-Juan Zhang; Marco Yu; Yu-Meng Wang; Carol Y Cheung; Ka-Wai Kam; Alvin L Young; Li-Jia Chen; Clement C Tham; Chi-Pui Pang; Jason C Yam
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.