Literature DB >> 31362561

A randomized controlled trial of tibial component migration with kinematic alignment using patient-specific instrumentation versus mechanical alignment using computer-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty.

E K Laende1,2, C G Richardson1,2, M J Dunbar1,2.   

Abstract

AIMS: Patient-specific instrumentation of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a technique permitting the targeting of individual kinematic alignment, but deviation from a neutral mechanical axis may have implications on implant fixation and therefore survivorship. The primary objective of this randomized controlled study was to compare the fixation of tibial components implanted with patient-specific instrumentation targeting kinematic alignment (KA+PSI) versus components placed using computer-assisted surgery targeting neutral mechanical alignment (MA+CAS). Tibial component migration measured by radiostereometric analysis was the primary outcome measure (compared longitudinally between groups and to published acceptable thresholds). Secondary outcome measures were inducible displacement after one year and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) over two years. The secondary objective was to assess the relationship between alignment and both tibial component migration and inducible displacement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 47 patients due to undergo TKA were randomized to KA+PSI (n = 24) or MA+CAS (n = 23). In the KA+PSI group, there were 16 female and eight male patients with a mean age of 64 years (sd 8). In the MA+CAS group, there were 17 female and six male patients with a mean age of 63 years (sd 7). Surgery was performed using cemented, cruciate-retaining Triathlon total knees with patellar resurfacing, and patients were followed up for two years. The effect of alignment on tibial component migration and inducible displacement was analyzed irrespective of study group.
RESULTS: There was no difference over two years in longitudinal migration of the tibial component between the KA+PSI and MA+CAS groups (reaching median maximum total point motion migration at two years of 0.40 mm for the KA+PSI group and 0.37 mm for the MA+CAS group, p = 0.82; p = 0.68 adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) for all follow-ups). Both groups had mean migrations below acceptable thresholds. There was no difference in inducible displacement (p = 0.34) or PROMS (p = 0.61 for the Oxford Knee Score) between groups. There was no correlation between alignment and tibial component migration or alignment and inducible displacement. These findings support non-neutral alignment as a viable option with this component, with no evidence that it compromises fixation.
CONCLUSION: Kinematic alignment using patient-specific instrumentation in TKA was associated with acceptable tibial component migration, indicating stable fixation. These results are supportive of future investigations of kinematic alignment. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:929-940.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kinematic alignment; Migration; Patient-specific instrumentation; Radiostereometric analysis; Total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31362561     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B8.BJJ-2018-0755.R3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  19 in total

Review 1.  [Limits of kinematic alignment and recommendations for its safe application].

Authors:  Tilman Calliess; Max Ettinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Current evidence base for kinematic alignment.

Authors:  L-R Tuecking; P Savov; H Windhagen; M Ettinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Low tibial baseplate migration 1 year after unrestricted kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty using a medial conforming implant design.

Authors:  Abigail E Niesen; Anna L Garverick; Stephen M Howell; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.114

4.  Total knee arthroplasty in Ranawat II valgus deformity with enlarged femoral valgus cut angle: A new technique to achieve balanced gap.

Authors:  Shuai-Jie Lv; Xiao-Jian Wang; Jie-Feng Huang; Qiang Mao; Bang-Jian He; Pei-Jian Tong
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 1.534

5.  Joint line is restored in robotic-arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty performed with a tibia-based functional alignment.

Authors:  Francesco Zambianchi; Gabriele Bazzan; Andrea Marcovigi; Marco Pavesi; Andrea Illuminati; Andrea Ensini; Fabio Catani
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Patient-specific instrumentation combined with a new tool for gap balancing is useful in total knee replacement: a 3-year follow-up of a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ting Deng; Tangyou Liu; Qing Lei; Lihong Cai; Song Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  CORR Insights®: No Difference in 5-year Clinical or Radiographic Outcomes Between Kinematic and Mechanical Alignment in TKA: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Petra J C Heesterbeek
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  Kinematic versus mechanical alignment for primary total knee arthroplasty with minimum 2 years follow-up: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elliot Sappey-Marinier; Adrien Pauvert; Cécile Batailler; John Swan; Laurence Cheze; Elvire Servien; Sébastien Lustig
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2020-06-17

9.  RSA-tested TKA Implants on Average Have Lower Mean 10-year Revision Rates Than Non-RSA-tested Designs.

Authors:  Shaho Hasan; Perla J Marang-van de Mheen; Bart L Kaptein; Rob G H H Nelissen; Bart G Pijls
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 10.  Comparison of Kinematic Alignment and Mechanical Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Zhi-Xiang Gao; Neng-Ji Long; Shao-Yun Zhang; Wei Yu; Yi-Xin Dai; Cong Xiao
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-10-25       Impact factor: 2.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.