Literature DB >> 31362173

Light pollution in USA and Europe: The good, the bad and the ugly.

F Falchi1, R Furgoni2, T A Gallaway3, N A Rybnikova4, B A Portnov5, K Baugh6, P Cinzano2, C D Elvidge7.   

Abstract

Light pollution is a worldwide problem that has a range of adverse effects on human health and natural ecosystems. Using data from the New World Atlas of Artificial Night Sky Brightness, VIIRS-recorded radiance and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) data, we compared light pollution levels, and the light flux to the population size and GDP at the State and County levels in the USA and at Regional (NUTS2) and Province (NUTS3) levels in Europe. We found 6800-fold differences between the most and least polluted regions in Europe, 120-fold differences in their light flux per capita, and 267-fold differences in flux per GDP unit. Yet, we found even greater differences between US counties: 200,000-fold differences in sky pollution, 16,000-fold differences in light flux per capita, and 40,000-fold differences in light flux per GDP unit. These findings may inform policy-makers, helping to reduce energy waste and adverse environmental, cultural and health consequences associated with light pollution.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial light at Night (ALAN); Artificial night sky brightness; Energy waste; Light pollution; Sustainable lighting

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31362173     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  6 in total

1.  Costs and benefits of "insect friendly" artificial lights are taxon specific.

Authors:  Avalon C S Owens; Caroline T Dressler; Sara M Lewis
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Heart healthy cities: genetics loads the gun but the environment pulls the trigger.

Authors:  Thomas Münzel; Mette Sørensen; Jos Lelieveld; Omar Hahad; Sadeer Al-Kindi; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen; Billie Giles-Corti; Andreas Daiber; Sanjay Rajagopalan
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Reducing Variability and Removing Natural Light from Nighttime Satellite Imagery: A Case Study Using the VIIRS DNB.

Authors:  Jacqueline Coesfeld; Theres Kuester; Helga U Kuechly; Christopher C M Kyba
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Artificial light at night at the terrestrial-aquatic interface: Effects on predators and fluxes of insect prey.

Authors:  Elizabeth Parkinson; Justine Lawson; Scott D Tiegs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Daytime Exposure to Blue Light Alters Cardiovascular Circadian Rhythms, Electrolyte Excretion and Melatonin Production.

Authors:  Anna A Bryk; Mikhail L Blagonravov; Vyacheslav A Goryachev; Sergey M Chibisov; Madina M Azova; Sergey P Syatkin
Journal:  Pathophysiology       Date:  2022-03-14

6.  Transcriptional Response of Circadian Clock Genes to an 'Artificial Light at Night' Pulse in the Cricket Gryllus bimaculatus.

Authors:  Keren Levy; Bettina Fishman; Anat Barnea; Amir Ayali; Eran Tauber
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 6.208

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.