Literature DB >> 31362154

Mapping urban air quality using mobile sampling with low-cost sensors and machine learning in Seoul, South Korea.

Chris C Lim1, Ho Kim2, M J Ruzmyn Vilcassim3, George D Thurston3, Terry Gordon3, Lung-Chi Chen3, Kiyoung Lee2, Michael Heimbinder4, Sun-Young Kim5.   

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated that mobile sampling can improve the spatial granularity of land use regression (LUR) models. Mobile sampling campaigns deploying low-cost (<$300) air quality sensors could potentially offer an inexpensive and practical approach to measure and model air pollution concentration levels. In this study, we developed LUR models for street-level fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentration levels in Seoul, South Korea. 169 h of data were collected from an approximately three week long campaign across five routes by ten volunteers sharing seven AirBeams, a low-cost ($250 per unit), smartphone-based particle counter, while geospatial data were extracted from OpenStreetMap, an open-source and crowd-generated geographical dataset. We applied and compared three statistical approaches in constructing the LUR models - linear regression (LR), random forest (RF), and stacked ensemble (SE) combining multiple machine learning algorithms - which resulted in cross-validation R2 values of 0.63, 0.73, and 0.80, respectively, and identification of several pollution 'hotspots.' The high R2 values suggest that study designs employing mobile sampling in conjunction with multiple low-cost air quality monitors could be applied to characterize urban street-level air quality with high spatial resolution, and that machine learning models could further improve model performance. Given this study design's cost-effectiveness and ease of implementation, similar approaches may be especially suitable for citizen science and community-based endeavors, or in regions bereft of air quality data and preexisting air monitoring networks, such as developing countries.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31362154      PMCID: PMC6728172          DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  30 in total

1.  Can commercial low-cost sensor platforms contribute to air quality monitoring and exposure estimates?

Authors:  Nuria Castell; Franck R Dauge; Philipp Schneider; Matthias Vogt; Uri Lerner; Barak Fishbain; David Broday; Alena Bartonova
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 9.621

2.  Proliferation of low-cost sensors. What prospects for air pollution epidemiologic research in Sub-Saharan Africa?

Authors:  A Kofi Amegah
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  Field and Laboratory Evaluations of the Low-Cost Plantower Particulate Matter Sensor.

Authors:  Misti Levy Zamora; Fulizi Xiong; Drew Gentner; Branko Kerkez; Joseph Kohrman-Glaser; Kirsten Koehler
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Capturing the sensitivity of land-use regression models to short-term mobile monitoring campaigns using air pollution micro-sensors.

Authors:  L Minet; R Gehr; M Hatzopoulou
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 5.  Applications of low-cost sensing technologies for air quality monitoring and exposure assessment: How far have they gone?

Authors:  Lidia Morawska; Phong K Thai; Xiaoting Liu; Akwasi Asumadu-Sakyi; Godwin Ayoko; Alena Bartonova; Andrea Bedini; Fahe Chai; Bryce Christensen; Matthew Dunbabin; Jian Gao; Gayle S W Hagler; Rohan Jayaratne; Prashant Kumar; Alexis K H Lau; Peter K K Louie; Mandana Mazaheri; Zhi Ning; Nunzio Motta; Ben Mullins; Md Mahmudur Rahman; Zoran Ristovski; Mahnaz Shafiei; Dian Tjondronegoro; Dane Westerdahl; Ron Williams
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 9.621

6.  Effects of subchronic exposures to concentrated ambient particles (CAPs) in mice. II. The design of a CAPs exposure system for biometric telemetry monitoring.

Authors:  Polina Maciejczyk; Mianhua Zhong; Qian Li; Judy Xiong; Christine Nadziejko; Lung Chi Chen
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.724

7.  Evaluation of consumer monitors to measure particulate matter.

Authors:  Sinan Sousan; Kirsten Koehler; Laura Hallett; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  J Aerosol Sci       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.433

8.  Land Use Regression Models of On-Road Particulate Air Pollution (Particle Number, Black Carbon, PM2.5, Particle Size) Using Mobile Monitoring.

Authors:  Steve Hankey; Julian D Marshall
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Assessing the Utility of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors over a 12-Week Period in the Cuyama Valley of California.

Authors:  Anondo Mukherjee; Levi G Stanton; Ashley R Graham; Paul T Roberts
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 10.  Miniaturized Monitors for Assessment of Exposure to Air Pollutants: A Review.

Authors:  Francesca Borghi; Andrea Spinazzè; Sabrina Rovelli; Davide Campagnolo; Luca Del Buono; Andrea Cattaneo; Domenico M Cavallo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 3.390

View more
  5 in total

1.  Statistical field calibration of a low-cost PM2.5 monitoring network in Baltimore.

Authors:  Abhirup Datta; Arkajyoti Saha; Misti Levy Zamora; Colby Buehler; Lei Hao; Fulizi Xiong; Drew R Gentner; Kirsten Koehler
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  High-Resolution Urban Air Quality Mapping for Multiple Pollutants Based on Dense Monitoring Data and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Rong Guo; Ying Qi; Bu Zhao; Ziyu Pei; Fei Wen; Shun Wu; Qiang Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Youth Engaged Participatory Air Monitoring: A 'Day in the Life' in Urban Environmental Justice Communities.

Authors:  Jill E Johnston; Zully Juarez; Sandy Navarro; Ashley Hernandez; Wendy Gutschow
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Feasibility of low-cost particle sensor types in long-term indoor air pollution health studies after repeated calibration, 2019-2021.

Authors:  Elle Anastasiou; M J Ruzmyn Vilcassim; John Adragna; Emily Gill; Albert Tovar; Lorna E Thorpe; Terry Gordon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Applications of artificial intelligence in the field of air pollution: A bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Qiangqiang Guo; Mengjuan Ren; Shouyuan Wu; Yajia Sun; Jianjian Wang; Qi Wang; Yanfang Ma; Xuping Song; Yaolong Chen
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.