Michael W Seward1, Roberta E Goldman, Stephanie K Linakis, Paul Werth, Christina A Roberto, Jason P Block. 1. Division of Chronic Disease Research Across the Lifecourse, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts (Mr Seward, Ms Linakis, Mr Werth, Dr Block); Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Goldman); Department of Family Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (Dr Goldman); Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lebanon, New Hampshire (Mr Werth); Department of Psychology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri (Mr Werth); and Department of Medical Ethics & Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Dr Roberto).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Research on employee opinions of workplace wellness programs is limited. METHODS: At a large academic medical center in Boston, we conducted 12 focus groups on employee perceptions of wellness programs. We analyzed data using the immersion-crystallization approach. Participant mean age (N = 109) was 41 years; 89% were female; 54% were white. RESULTS: Employees cited prominent barriers to program participation: limited availability; time and marketing; disparities in access; and workplace culture. Encouraging supportive, interpersonal relationships among employees and perceived institutional support for wellness may improve workplace culture and improve participation. Employees suggested changes to physical space, including onsite showers and recommended that a centralized wellness program could create and market initiatives such as competitions and incentives. CONCLUSION: Employees sought measures to address serious constraints on time and space, sometimes toxic interpersonal relationships, and poor communication, aspects of workplaces not typically addressed by wellness efforts.
OBJECTIVE: Research on employee opinions of workplace wellness programs is limited. METHODS: At a large academic medical center in Boston, we conducted 12 focus groups on employee perceptions of wellness programs. We analyzed data using the immersion-crystallization approach. Participant mean age (N = 109) was 41 years; 89% were female; 54% were white. RESULTS: Employees cited prominent barriers to program participation: limited availability; time and marketing; disparities in access; and workplace culture. Encouraging supportive, interpersonal relationships among employees and perceived institutional support for wellness may improve workplace culture and improve participation. Employees suggested changes to physical space, including onsite showers and recommended that a centralized wellness program could create and market initiatives such as competitions and incentives. CONCLUSION: Employees sought measures to address serious constraints on time and space, sometimes toxic interpersonal relationships, and poor communication, aspects of workplaces not typically addressed by wellness efforts.
Authors: Katherine McCleary; Ron Z Goetzel; Enid Chung Roemer; Jeff Berko; Karen Kent; Hector De La Torre Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Gautam Gowrisankaran; Karen Norberg; Steven Kymes; Michael E Chernew; Dustin Stwalley; Leah Kemper; William Peck Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Laura Linnan; Mike Bowling; Jennifer Childress; Garry Lindsay; Carter Blakey; Stephanie Pronk; Sharon Wieker; Penelope Royall Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-11-29 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Seonad K Madden; Claire A Blewitt; Kiran D K Ahuja; Helen Skouteris; Cate M Bailey; Andrew P Hills; Briony Hill Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-14 Impact factor: 3.390