Literature DB >> 31360357

Evaluation of Preventive Antibacterial Properties of a Glass-Ionomer Cement Containing Purified Powder of Salvia officinalis: An In vitro Study.

Shahriar Shahriari1, Mehrdad Barekatain1, Mohammad Ali Shahtalebi2, Shirin Zahra Farhad3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this study, the anti-Streptococcus mutans and anti-Lactobacillus casei properties of a restorative glass-ionomer cement (GIC) modified with extract powder of Salvia officinalis as a safe and effective herbal extract at weight concentration levels of 0.5%, 0.75%, 1%, and 1.25% are investigated.
METHODS: The S. officinalis extract powder is provided by doing a multistep laboratory procedure and is filtered to obtain particles smaller than 50 μ. The GIC powder is modified by adding extract powder in weight concentrations of 0.5% (Group II), 0.75% (Group III), 1% (Group IV), and 1.25% (Group V) to form experimental groups, each of 1 g. Five disk-shaped samples, 1 cm in diameter and 2 mm height, of each group (including control group [Group I]) are prepared for each bacterial category of S. mutans and L. casei. The twenty-five samples for each category are tested in vitro against strains of S. mutans and L. casei. Following Agar diffusion tests, the inhibition zone diameters are recorded. The data are tested for normality by means of Kolmogorov-Smirnov procedure. The Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests are used to perform a one-way ANOVA and to do pair-wise comparisons, respectively, at 5% significance level.
RESULTS: The mean diameter of the inhibition zones are significantly different among the test groups and also the test groups and the control group except for the group with 0.5% in L. casei category which shows no significant difference with the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study revealed direct inhibitory activities of S. officinalis-containing GIC against S. mutans and L. casei in a dose-response manner.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial agents; Salvia officinalis; dental material; glass ionomer

Year:  2019        PMID: 31360357      PMCID: PMC6592137          DOI: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_81_17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prev Med        ISSN: 2008-7802


Introduction

Dental caries is still a major concern in public health management.[1] Establishment of a productive dental health philosophy, especially for the low socioeconomic levels of the society, where the lack of development endangers the dental health, even more, seems to be necessary.[2] Microbial nature of caries and the contemporary concept of treatment based on the medical model necessitate the consideration of chemical control plans along with the traditional mechanical means of caries control.[3] Innovations in dental material science are come to the point of developing smart materials.[4] glass-ionomer cement (GIC), a tooth-colored acid-base material, with the capability of fluoride release in an aqueous environment is the first of this category.[34] It can be used as base, liner, or direct restorative material and is also considered as the material of choice in atraumatic restorative technique (ART). The ART is a minimal intervention approach, particularly beneficial for pediatric and elderly patients as well as those with dental anxiety or learning difficulties.[3] While the bulk of evidence supports the protective nature of fluoride in public water and oral health products; however, the data available does not endorse the anti-caries ability of GIC or any useful outcome of fluoride-releasing restorative materials.[35] To address the issue, multiple modifications are being under investigation to develop a GIC with direct antimicrobial effect based on its ability to participate in ion-exchange reactions with the oral environment.[35] Such a material would be of tremendous clinical benefits. Providing antibacterial seal leads to suppression of remaining bacteriae under the restoration, reduced postoperative sensitivity, improved pulpal and periodontal health, and finally reduction in recurrent caries. Different studies are designed attempting to develop a modified GIC by incorporation of antimicrobial agents such as chlorhexidine hydrochloride, cetylpyridinium chloride, cetrimide, and benzalkonium chloride.[6] Hook et al. proposed a GIC functionalized with chlorhexidine-hexametaphosphate particles. The suggested material released chlorhexidine in a dose-dependent manner and showed to have antimicrobial properties.[3] In another study, de Castilho et al. added doxycycline hyclate as an antibiotic with local antimicrobial and antimatrix metalloproteinase activities into the GIC. The modified material showed inhibitory effects on caries producing bacteria.[7] Deepalakshmi et al. incorporated chlorhexidine and cetrimide as wide-spectrum antiseptics into GIC and developed an antibacterial material.[6] Herbal extracts have recently gained even more attention as active agents to be incorporated into oral care products and dental materials. Many of them have potential antimicrobial activities which could lead to the production of safe, economical, and efficient alternative materials for use in caries management.[8] The Iranian herbal medicine with a long history of effectiveness and safety is a rich source of such agents. Salvia officinalis, which is also called Sage, is a perennial evergreen plant native to Mediterranean region[8] and is also naturalized in Iran.[9] It has woody stems, grayish leaves with blue-to-purplish flowers. A long ancient and contemporary history of medicinal and pharmacological applications supports its use. S. officinalis extract has antimicrobial, analgesic, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties.[810] The essential oil of S. officinalis consists of alpha- and beta-thujone, borneol, camphor, and cineole. In contemporary European herbal medicine, a type of S. officinalis tea is commonly advocated to control a sore throat, inflammatory oral lesions, and gingivitis.[810] Kermanshah et al. showed Sage mouthwash to have an inhibitory effect on caries-producing oral microbial flora.[9] In another study, Beheshti-Rouy et al. proved the S. officinalis extract to be effective in reducing the number of Streptococcus mutans colonies in bacterial plaque.[11] Different other studies also reported the inhibitory effect of S. officinalis extract on collagenolytic activity of Porphyromonas gingivalis,[12] and also on the attachment of Candida albicans to denture surfaces.[8] In an attempt to develop a GIC with direct antimicrobial properties, this study is conducted to investigate any possible inhibitory effects S. officinalis modified GIC may have on S. mutans and Lactobacillus casei as the main bacteria involved in caries initiation and progression process. The experiment is performed for S. officinalis weight concentration levels of 0.5%, 0.75%, 1%, and 1.25%.

Methods

Some high-quality dried S. officinalis is purchased from a local herbal medicine retail store (Parand herbal products, Isfahan, Iran). Leaves of the plant are chopped and fragmented into small pieces and filtered through a #40 mesh (Sina Lab. Inst., Tehran, Iran). Each 50 g of leaves are soaked in 1500 ml of solvent (50% water, 50% ethanol [96%]) in a shaker apparatus (Heidolph Unmax, Schwabach, Germany) at 90 rpm for 48 h. Thereafter, the solution is passed through a strainer and then transferred to a rotary evaporator apparatus (Heidolph WD2000; Schwabach, Germany) to separate the solvent from the extract.[11] The purified extract is then dried by applying freeze-drying technique in three stages over a 1-week period. The final extract powder is stored in sealed vial at low temperature to be used in the next steps. To filter the particles, the same size as range of GIC powder which is to be <50 μ, the powder is grinded and again filtered through a #270 laboratory mesh (Sina Lab. Inst., Tehran, Iran). The procedure is performed under the supervision of a pharmacology professor at the main laboratory of the School of Pharmacy, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Isfahan, Iran. A conventional powder and liquid Fuji IX GIC (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) is used as control group named Group I. Experimental GIC samples are prepared by incorporating S. officinalis extract powder into the powder component of Fuji IX GIC (GC Corporations, Tokyo, Japan) at 0.5% (Group II), 0.75% (Group III), 1% (Group IV), and 1.25% (Group V) weight concentration levels using a digital weight scale (CAS MWP Micro Weighing Balance, CAS Scales, New Zealand). Thus, four groups of experimental powder formulations are obtained, each sample weighs 1000 mg according to the procedure outlined in.[6] The concentrations used in this research are based on the minimal inhibitory concentration and minimal bacterial assays suggested in.[9] The groups are presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Test groups assigned to each bacterial category based on the weight concentration of Salvia officinalis extract powder

Test group number*Weight percentage concentration of S. officinalis extract powder^
I (control)0
II0.5%
III0.75%
IV1%
V1.25%

*These groups are assigned to each bacterial category (S. mutans and L. casei), ^Weight concentration of S. officinalis extract powder added to the powder component of Fuji IX Glass-ionomer cement (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) to form test groups. S. mutans=Streptococcus mutans, L. casei=Lactobacillus casei, S. officinalis=Salvia officinalis

Test groups assigned to each bacterial category based on the weight concentration of Salvia officinalis extract powder *These groups are assigned to each bacterial category (S. mutans and L. casei), ^Weight concentration of S. officinalis extract powder added to the powder component of Fuji IX Glass-ionomer cement (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) to form test groups. S. mutans=Streptococcus mutans, L. casei=Lactobacillus casei, S. officinalis=Salvia officinalis Five specimens are prepared from each experimental group by a specialist in restorative dentistry. Powder/liquid is dispensed on a mixing pad according to the manufacturer recommendations and mixed for 30 s with a sterile plastic spatula, and then inserted into the stainless steel molds of 10 mm in diameter and 2-mm thickness (Abzar Iran, Arak, Iran) within 1 min with a sterile dental instrument and allowed to set for 30 min at room temperatures, same as the procedure in.[6] Stock cultures of S. mutans (UA159) and L. casei (ATCC #193) obtained from the Microbiology and Immunology Laboratory of the School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Isfahan, Iran are used by an expert laboratory technician. For each bacterial category, cells are cultured freshly from frozen stock on brain–heart infusion broth (BHI; DIFCO Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA) for 24 h at 37°C in a 10% CO2 incubator. The viability and absence of contamination is confirmed by plating in a specific medium and using Gram procedures. Cultures are again grown in BHI for 20 h at 37°C and the inoculums for subsequent testing are obtained according to.[7] In each sterilized Petri dish (15 mm × 90 mm), a base layer containing 15 ml of BHI agar mixed with 300 ml of each inoculums (S. mutans and L. casei) was prepared according to.[7] The set disk-shaped specimens are placed on a BHI agar plate inoculated with bacterial strain and left at 37°C for 48 h. Zones of inhibition are then measured in millimeters using a digital caliper at three different points. Size of the inhibition zones is calculated by subtracting the diameter of the specimen from the average of the three measurements of the halo according to.[6]

Statistical analysis

Data are analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, SPSS software version 22 for Windows (IBM Inc., NY, USA). SPSS is a software package used in statistical analysis of data. This software package was developed by SPSS incorporation and acquired by IBM in 2009. In 2014, the software was officially renamed IBM SPSS statistics. Kolmogorov–Smirnov test is used to test the normality of the data. The test is rejected at significance level of 5%, and the data follow distributions different than normal. Thus, nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis, Mann–Whitney, and Wilcoxon signed-rank sum tests are performed to compare the test groups and also the test groups with the control group. Data are analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, version 22) for Windows (IBM Inc., NY, USA). Kolmogoro v–Smirnov test is used to test the normality distribution of the data. The nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests are then employed to compare the test groups and also the test groups with the control group. The statistical analyses are all performed at significance level of 5%.

Results

According to Kruskal–Wallis test, there was a significant difference between the mean diameter of the inhibition zone for Streptococcus mutans (P < 0.001) and Lactobacillus casei (P < 0.001) in different concentrations of salvia extract [Table 2].
Table 2

The mean diameter of the inhibition zone for Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus casei in different concentrations of salvia extract

ConcentrationMean±SDP

Group 1Group 2Group 3Group 4Group 5
Streptococcus mutans00.26±0.050.02±0.340.02±0.620.07±1.1<0.001
Lactobacillus casei00.05±0.040.02±0.470.05±0.560.05±1.06<0.001
The mean diameter of the inhibition zone for Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus casei in different concentrations of salvia extract According to Mann-Whitney test, the mean diameter of the inhibition zone for Streptococcus mutans was significantly different between all groups with each other and with the control group (P < 0.05) and the mean diameter of the inhibition zone for Lactobacillus casei was significantly different between all groups with each other and with the control group (P < 0.05), except between the control group and the group with the concentration of 0.5% (P = 0.134). [Tables 3 and 4].
Table 3

Comparison of the mean diameters of the inhibition zones between the test groups in the Streptococcus mutans category*

Test groupGroup IGroup IIGroup IIIGroup IVGroup V
Group I-
Group II0.005-
Group III0.0040.014-
Group IV0.0050.0070.006-
Group V0.0050.0070.0060.007-

*Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test as a nonparametric test was used for comparing the means. The numbers show P - value within groups. Significant level was considered at 5%

Table 4

Comparison of the mean diameters of the inhibition zones between the test groups in the Lactobacillus casei category*

Test groupGroup IGroup IIGroup IIIGroup IVGroup V
Group I-
Group II0.134-
Group III0.0050.007-
Group IV0.0050.0070.02-
Group V0.0050.0070.0070.007-

*Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test as a nonparametric test was used for comparing the means. The numbers show P - value within groups. Significant level was considered at 5%

Comparison of the mean diameters of the inhibition zones between the test groups in the Streptococcus mutans category* *Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test as a nonparametric test was used for comparing the means. The numbers show P - value within groups. Significant level was considered at 5% Comparison of the mean diameters of the inhibition zones between the test groups in the Lactobacillus casei category* *Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test as a nonparametric test was used for comparing the means. The numbers show P - value within groups. Significant level was considered at 5% Pairwise comparison of the mean diameter of inhibition zones of samples with similar concentrations in the Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus showed that only the inhibitory effect of the concentration of 0.5% on Streptococcus mutans was significantly higher than that of Lactobacillus acidophilus [Table 5].
Table 5

Comparison of the mean diameters of the inhibition zones of the same group between two bacterial categories of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus casei*

Test groupMean diameter of the inhibition zonesP

S. mutansL. casei
Group II0.26 mm0.04 mm0.006
Group III0.34 mm0.47 mm0.058^
Group IV0.62 mm0.56 mm0.339^
Group V1.10 mm1.06 mm0.99^

*Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test as a nonparametric test was used for comparing the means. Significant level was considered at 5%, ^P-value indicates no statistically significant difference. S. mutans=Streptococcus mutans, L. casei=Lactobacillus casei

Comparison of the mean diameters of the inhibition zones of the same group between two bacterial categories of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus casei* *Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test as a nonparametric test was used for comparing the means. Significant level was considered at 5%, ^P-value indicates no statistically significant difference. S. mutans=Streptococcus mutans, L. casei=Lactobacillus casei

Discussion

In this research, the possibility of producing an herbally modified GIC with direct antibacterial properties is investigated. A distinguishing feature of this study is the use of an herbal extract with a long history of safety and effectiveness instead of chemical agents to produce a modified GIC. The results showed that the incorporation of S. officinalis extract into the powder component of a routinely used GIC produces a dental material with direct inhibitory properties against the most important bacterial causes of dental caries. It is also shown that this ability has a dose-response nature. The statistically nonsignificant difference between Group I and Group II (control group) in the L. casei category shows a lower potential in S. officinalis to inhibit the L. casei at its lowest concentration. The statistically significant higher value of the mean inhibition zone diameter in Group II of the S. mutans category compared to the Group II of the L. casei category points also to the same finding which should be considered cautiously. The findings of this study challenge the traditional idea that the dental materials must be passive without any interactions with surrounding oral environment[4] and also recommends the use of materials with active capabilities as a possible approach in the management of different carious states. It seems that the ability of such a modified GIC to inhibit the bacterial activity depends on its interactions with the surrounding aqueous environment.[35] It is shown that bacteria responsible for caries may survive up to 2 years even under regular GICs, which many believe to have anticarious properties.[13] This means that any intentional (in case of close proximity to pulp) or unintentional residual caries under the restorations may progress and encroach on pulp and produce discomfort for patient and finally endanger the pulp vitality.[141516] This also questions the accuracy of ART, in which multiple carious teeth are only excavated with a hand instrument and filled with a regular GIC, especially in low socioeconomic areas of society.[21617] A modified GIC with direct antimicrobial properties addresses the situation here. Different investigators incorporated different antimicrobial agents in different concentrations into GIC in an attempt to find a novel solution.[136718] Wide-spectrum antimicrobials such as chlorhexidine,[1318] cetrimide,[6] and antibiotics[76] were at the center of the scope of those studies. The agent(s) were added into the powder or liquid component of the GIC, utilizing different incorporation techniques. However, none of them are incorporated any herbal agent as a safer source with fewer or no possible complications such as mucosal or dental staining seen in chlorhexidine products.[19] The reasons for selecting the S. officinalis in this research are the long history of successes and no history of any negative side effect documented for, in traditional and contemporary medical literature.[12] It is also reported that S. officinalis extract has superior efficiency compared to the antibiotics and has also less chance of drug resistance when used in high concentrations.[20] In addition, researchers are recently investigating possible applications of S. officinalis essential oil extract in oral care products. The studies reported inhibitory effect of the extract on many oral bacteria and fungi responsible for carious and periodontal infections.[891112] They also reported positive effect on reducing the number of plaque bacterial colonies,[11] impairing plaque formation,[2122] and fungi attachment to prosthetic surfaces.[8] Based on the available evidence, which recognizes the anti-inflammatory properties in S. officinalis extract,[912202223] one may suggest the use of the S. officinalis modified GIC may alleviate and control the inflammatory status of the pulp or periodontium. It is recommended to conduct experiments to investigate such abilities. While the presence of S. officinalis extract as an antibacterial agent in GIC is effective against oral pathogens, investigations to evaluate other important properties such as mechanical, physical, and biocompatibility properties of the material are highly recommended before any routine clinical applications. Considerations should be taken to improve the color of S. officinalis modified GIC since the current product has an intense yellow color.

Conclusions

Within the limitations of this study, it is concluded that a S. officinalis modified GIC has a direct antibacterial property against S. mutans and L. casei. This, in turn, provides many advantages for use as a base, liner, or restorative material in operative procedures and management of the complications of carious teeth. It also emphasizes the importance of the herbal agents in developing new dental materials with astonishing properties.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  18 in total

Review 1.  Glass-ionomer restoratives: a systematic review of a secondary caries treatment effect.

Authors:  R C Randall; N H Wilson
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Evaluation of the antibacterial and physical properties of glass ionomer cements containing chlorhexidine and cetrimide: an in-vitro study.

Authors:  Mohanavelu Deepalakshmi; Saravanan Poorni; Revathi Miglani; Indira Rajamani; S Ramachandran
Journal:  Indian J Dent Res       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec

3.  The efficacy of a herbal-based toothpaste in the control of plaque and gingivitis: a clinico-biochemical study.

Authors:  Jacob George; Shashikant Hegde; K S Rajesh; Arun Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Dent Res       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec

Review 4.  Smart materials in dentistry.

Authors:  J F McCabe; Z Yan; O T Al Naimi; G Mahmoud; S L Rolland
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.291

5.  Prevention of artificial dental plaque formation in vitro by plant extracts.

Authors:  J Smullen; M Finney; D M Storey; H A Foster
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.772

6.  Mechanical and biological characterization of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement containing doxycycline hyclate.

Authors:  Aline R F de Castilho; Cristiane Duque; Thais de C Negrini; Nancy T Sacono; Andréia B de Paula; Patrícia A Sacramento; Carlos A de Souza Costa; Denise M P Spolidorio; Regina M Puppin-Rontani
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 2.633

7.  Chlorhexidine release from an experimental glass ionomer cement.

Authors:  G Palmer; F H Jones; R W Billington; G J Pearson
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Long-term antibacterial effects and physical properties of a chlorhexidine-containing glass ionomer cement.

Authors:  L Sebnem Türkün; Murat Türkün; Fahinur Ertuğrul; Mustafa Ateş; Stefan Brugger
Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.843

Review 9.  Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.

Authors:  Veerasamy Yengopal; Suyara Yasmin Harneker; Naren Patel; Nandi Siegfried
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-04-15

Review 10.  Treatment of deep carious lesions by complete excavation or partial removal: a critical review.

Authors:  Van Thompson; Ronald G Craig; Fredrick A Curro; William S Green; Jonathan A Ship
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.634

View more
  2 in total

1.  An in vitro evaluation of the compressive strength and shear bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement containing purified powder of Salvia officinalis.

Authors:  Maryam Forouzanmehr; Mehrdad Barekatain; Mohammad Ali Shahtalebi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2020-09-07

2.  Antimicrobial Efficacy of Glass Ionomer Cement in Incorporation with Biogenic Zingiber officinale Capped Silver-Nanobiotic, Chlorhexidine Diacetate and Lyophilized Miswak.

Authors:  Amal Adnan Ashour; Sakeenabi Basha; Nayef H Felemban; Enas T Enan; Amal Ahmed Alyamani; Sanaa M F Gad El-Rab
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.