Literature DB >> 21564111

Smart materials in dentistry.

J F McCabe1, Z Yan, O T Al Naimi, G Mahmoud, S L Rolland.   

Abstract

Most dental materials are designed to have a relatively 'neutral' existence in the mouth. It is considered that if they are 'passive' and do not react with the oral environment they will be more stable and have a greater durability. At the same time, it is hoped that our materials will be well accepted and will cause neither harm nor injury. This is an entirely negative approach to material tolerance and biocompatibility and hides the possibility that some positive gains can be achieved by using materials which behave in a more dynamic fashion in the environment in which they are placed. An example of materials which have potential for 'dynamic' behaviour exists with structures which are partly water-based or have phases or zones with significant water content and for which the water within the material can react to changes in the ambient conditions. Such materials may even be said to have the potential for 'smart' behaviour, i.e. they can react to changes in the environment to bring about advantageous changes in properties, either within the material itself or in the material-tooth complex. The controlled movement of water or aqueous media through the material may cause changes in dimensions, may be the carrier for various dissolved species, and may influence the potential for the formation of biofilms at the surface. Some of these issues may be closely interrelated. Clearly, materials which do not have the capacity for water transport or storage do not have the potential for this sort of behaviour. Some materials which are normally resistant to the healthy oral environment can undergo controlled degradation at low pH in order to release ions which may prove beneficial or protective. It is doubtful whether such behaviour should be classified as 'smart' because the material cannot readily return to its original condition when the stimulus is removed. Other materials, such as certain alloys, having no means of transporting water through their structure, can display smart behaviour by undergoing predictable changes in structure in response to applied mechanical or thermal stimuli. It has been difficult to harness such behaviour to the benefit of patients but progress in this area is slowly being made.
© 2011 Australian Dental Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21564111     DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01291.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Dent J        ISSN: 0045-0421            Impact factor:   2.291


  9 in total

Review 1.  Biosmart materials: breaking new ground in dentistry.

Authors:  Vijetha Badami; Bharat Ahuja
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-02-02

Review 2.  Nanoscale and Macroscale Scaffolds with Controlled-Release Polymeric Systems for Dental Craniomaxillofacial Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Saeed Ur Rahman; Malvika Nagrath; Sasikumar Ponnusamy; Praveen R Arany
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Evaluating the Mechanical Properties, and Calcium and Fluoride Release of Glass-Ionomer Cement Modified with Chicken Eggshell Powder.

Authors:  Gehan Allam; Ola Abd El-Geleel
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-18

4.  Evaluation of Preventive Antibacterial Properties of a Glass-Ionomer Cement Containing Purified Powder of Salvia officinalis: An In vitro Study.

Authors:  Shahriar Shahriari; Mehrdad Barekatain; Mohammad Ali Shahtalebi; Shirin Zahra Farhad
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2019-06-12

5.  An in vitro evaluation of the compressive strength and shear bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement containing purified powder of Salvia officinalis.

Authors:  Maryam Forouzanmehr; Mehrdad Barekatain; Mohammad Ali Shahtalebi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2020-09-07

Review 6.  Bio-piezoelectricity: fundamentals and applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Nagwa Ahmed Kamel
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2022-06-28

Review 7.  A review of glass-ionomers: From conventional glass-ionomer to bioactive glass-ionomer.

Authors:  Maryam Khoroushi; Fateme Keshani
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2013-07

8.  Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation and Microleakage of Three Glass Ionomer-Based Class V Restorations: In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Maha M Ebaya; Ashraf I Ali; Salah H Mahmoud
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2019-12-31

9.  Ion release and recharge from a fissure sealant containing amorphous calcium phosphate.

Authors:  Mahtab Memarpour; Neda Afzali Baghdadabadi; Azade Rafiee; Mehrdad Vossoughi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.