N A Mohd Salleh1,2,3, N Fairbairn2,4, S Nolan2,4, R Barrios5,6, J Shoveller2,7, L Richardson2,8, M-J Milloy2,4. 1. Interdisciplinary Studies Graduate Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 2. BC Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 3. Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 4. Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 5. BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 6. Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 7. School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 8. Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine the association between dispensation of methadone maintenance therapy (MMT) and antiretroviral therapy (ART) at the same facility, across multiple low-barrier dispensing outlets, and achieving optimal adherence to ART among people who use illicit drugs (PWUD). METHODS: We used data from the AIDS Care Cohort to Evaluate Exposure to Survival Services (ACCESS) study, a long-running study of a community-recruited cohort of HIV-positive PWUD, linked to comprehensive HIV clinical records in Vancouver, Canada, a setting of no-cost, universal access to HIV care. The longitudinal relationship between MMT-ART dispensation at the same facility and the odds of ≥ 95% ART adherence was analysed using multivariable generalized linear mixed-effects modelling. We conducted a further analysis using a marginal structural mode with inverse probability of treatment weights as a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: This study included data on 1690 interviews of 345 ART- and MMT-exposed participants carried out between June 2012 and December 2017. In the final multivariable model, MMT-ART dispensation, compared with nondispensation at the same facility, was associated with greater odds of achieving ≥ 95% adherence [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.56; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-1.96]. A marginal structural model estimated a 1.48 (95% CI 1.15-1.80) greater odds of ≥ 95% adherence among participants who reported MMT-ART dispensation at the same facility compared with those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: The odds of achieving optimal adherence to ART were 56% higher during periods in which MMT and ART medications were dispensed at the same facility, in a low-barrier setting. Our findings highlight the need to consider a simpler integrated approach with medication dispensation at the same facility in low-threshold settings.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine the association between dispensation of methadone maintenance therapy (MMT) and antiretroviral therapy (ART) at the same facility, across multiple low-barrier dispensing outlets, and achieving optimal adherence to ART among people who use illicit drugs (PWUD). METHODS: We used data from the AIDS Care Cohort to Evaluate Exposure to Survival Services (ACCESS) study, a long-running study of a community-recruited cohort of HIV-positive PWUD, linked to comprehensive HIV clinical records in Vancouver, Canada, a setting of no-cost, universal access to HIV care. The longitudinal relationship between MMT-ART dispensation at the same facility and the odds of ≥ 95% ART adherence was analysed using multivariable generalized linear mixed-effects modelling. We conducted a further analysis using a marginal structural mode with inverse probability of treatment weights as a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: This study included data on 1690 interviews of 345 ART- and MMT-exposed participants carried out between June 2012 and December 2017. In the final multivariable model, MMT-ART dispensation, compared with nondispensation at the same facility, was associated with greater odds of achieving ≥ 95% adherence [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.56; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-1.96]. A marginal structural model estimated a 1.48 (95% CI 1.15-1.80) greater odds of ≥ 95% adherence among participants who reported MMT-ART dispensation at the same facility compared with those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: The odds of achieving optimal adherence to ART were 56% higher during periods in which MMT and ART medications were dispensed at the same facility, in a low-barrier setting. Our findings highlight the need to consider a simpler integrated approach with medication dispensation at the same facility in low-threshold settings.
Authors: R S Hogg; S A Rhone; B Yip; C Sherlock; B Conway; M T Schechter; M V O'Shaughnessy; J S Montaner Journal: AIDS Date: 1998-02-12 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: D L Paterson; S Swindells; J Mohr; M Brester; E N Vergis; C Squier; M M Wagener; N Singh Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2000-07-04 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Thomas Kerr; Brandon D L Marshall; M-J Milloy; Ruth Zhang; Silvia Guillemi; Julio S G Montaner; Evan Wood Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2012-01-14 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Andy Guise; Maureen Seguin; Gitau Mburu; Susie McLean; Pippa Grenfell; Zahed Islam; Sergii Filippovych; Happy Assan; Andrea Low; Peter Vickerman; Tim Rhodes Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2017-03-10
Authors: Lindsey A Richardson; Thomas H Kerr; Sabina Dobrer; Cathy M Puskas; Silvia A Guillemi; Julio S G Montaner; Evan Wood; M-J S Milloy Journal: AIDS Date: 2015-11-28 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Kate A Salters; Stephanie Parent; Valerie Nicholson; Lu Wang; Paul Sereda; Tatiana E Pakhomova; Mia Kibel; William Chau; Kalysha Closson; Surita Parashar; Rolando Barrios; Julio S G Montaner; Robert S Hogg Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-04-08 Impact factor: 3.295