Literature DB >> 31359094

Fine Sediment Removal Influences Biogeochemical Processes in a Gravel-bottomed Stream.

Joseph A Morgan1, Todd V Royer2, Jeffrey R White2.   

Abstract

The transport and processing of nutrients and organic matter in streams are important functions that influence the condition of watersheds and downstream ecosystems. In this study, we investigated the effects of streambed sediment removal on biogeochemical cycling in Fawn River, a gravel-bottomed river in Indiana, U.S.A. We measured stream metabolism as well as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) retention in both restored and unrestored reaches of Fawn River to examine how sediment removal affected multiple biogeochemical functions at the reach scale. We also assessed the properties of restored and unrestored streambed sediments to elucidate potential mechanisms driving observed reach-scale differences. We found that sediment removal led to lower rates of primary productivity and ecosystem respiration in the restored reach, likely due to macrophyte removal and potentially due to changes to sediment organic matter quality. We found minimal differences in N and P retention, suggesting that these processes are controlled at larger spatial or temporal scales than were examined in this study. Denitrification enzyme activity was lower in sediments from the restored reach compared to the unrestored reach, suggesting that restoration may have decreased N removal. Our results indicate that most near-term changes in biogeochemical function following restoration could be attributed to macrophyte removal, although effects from sediment removal may emerge over longer timescales.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecosystem metabolism; Fawn River; Fine sediment; Macrophyte removal; Nutrient retention; Stream restoration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31359094      PMCID: PMC6869339          DOI: 10.1007/s00267-019-01187-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  8 in total

1.  Ecology. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts.

Authors:  E S Bernhardt; M A Palmer; J D Allan; G Alexander; K Barnas; S Brooks; J Carr; S Clayton; C Dahm; J Follstad-Shah; D Galat; S Gloss; P Goodwin; D Hart; B Hassett; R Jenkinson; S Katz; G M Kondolf; P S Lake; R Lave; J L Meyer; T K O'donnell; L Pagano; B Powell; E Sudduth
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Stream denitrification across biomes and its response to anthropogenic nitrate loading.

Authors:  Patrick J Mulholland; Ashley M Helton; Geoffrey C Poole; Robert O Hall; Stephen K Hamilton; Bruce J Peterson; Jennifer L Tank; Linda R Ashkenas; Lee W Cooper; Clifford N Dahm; Walter K Dodds; Stuart E G Findlay; Stanley V Gregory; Nancy B Grimm; Sherri L Johnson; William H McDowell; Judy L Meyer; H Maurice Valett; Jackson R Webster; Clay P Arango; Jake J Beaulieu; Melody J Bernot; Amy J Burgin; Chelsea L Crenshaw; Laura T Johnson; B R Niederlehner; Jonathan M O'Brien; Jody D Potter; Richard W Sheibley; Daniel J Sobota; Suzanne M Thomas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Phosphorus legacy: overcoming the effects of past management practices to mitigate future water quality impairment.

Authors:  Andrew Sharpley; Helen P Jarvie; Anthony Buda; Linda May; Bryan Spears; Peter Kleinman
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.751

4.  River restoration: the fuzzy logic of repairing reaches to reverse catchment scale degradation.

Authors:  Emily S Bernhardt; Margaret A Palmer
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Relating hydraulic conductivity and hyporheic zone biogeochemical processing to conserve and restore river ecosystem services.

Authors:  Clara Mendoza-Lera; Thibault Datry
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Are rivers just big streams? A pulse method to quantify nitrogen demand in a large river.

Authors:  Jennifer L Tank; Emma J Rosi-Marshall; Michelle A Baker; Robert O Hall
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.499

7.  Transport and fate of nitrate in headwater agricultural streams in Illinois.

Authors:  Todd V Royer; Jennifer L Tank; Mark B David
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.751

8.  Effects of channel restoration on water velocity, transient storage, and nutrient uptake in a channelized stream.

Authors:  Paul A Bukaveckas
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.