Inger Utne1, Borghild Løyland1, Ellen Karine Grov1, Steven Paul2, Melisa L Wong3, Yvette P Conley4, Bruce A Cooper2, Jon D Levine3, Christine Miaskowski5. 1. Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway. 2. School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. 3. School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. 4. School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 5. School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. Electronic address: chris.miaskowski@ucsf.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Evaluate how subgroups of older adults with distinct attentional function profiles differ on the severity of nine common symptoms and determine demographic and clinical characteristics and symptom severity scores associated with membership in the low and moderate attentional function classes. METHODS: Three subgroups of older oncology outpatients were identified using latent profile analysis based on Attentional Function Index (AFI) scores. Symptoms were assessed prior to the second or third cycle of CTX. Logistic regressions evaluated for associations with attentional function class membership. RESULTS: For trait anxiety, state anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, morning fatigue, and evening fatigue scores, differences among the latent classes followed the same pattern (low > moderate > high). For morning and evening energy, compared to high class, patients in low and moderate classes reported lower scores. For pain, compared to moderate class, patients in low class reported higher scores. In the logistic regression analysis, compared to high class, patients with lower income, higher comorbidity, higher CTX toxicity score, and higher levels of state anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbance were more likely to be in low AFI class. Compared to high class, patients with higher comorbidity and trait anxiety and lower morning energy were more likely to be in moderate AFI class. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the hypothesis that an increased risk for persistent cognitive decline is likely related to a variety of physical and psychological factors, for six of the nine symptoms, a "dose response" effect was observed with higher symptom severity scores associated with a progressive decline in attentional function.
PURPOSE: Evaluate how subgroups of older adults with distinct attentional function profiles differ on the severity of nine common symptoms and determine demographic and clinical characteristics and symptom severity scores associated with membership in the low and moderate attentional function classes. METHODS: Three subgroups of older oncology outpatients were identified using latent profile analysis based on Attentional Function Index (AFI) scores. Symptoms were assessed prior to the second or third cycle of CTX. Logistic regressions evaluated for associations with attentional function class membership. RESULTS: For trait anxiety, state anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, morning fatigue, and evening fatigue scores, differences among the latent classes followed the same pattern (low > moderate > high). For morning and evening energy, compared to high class, patients in low and moderate classes reported lower scores. For pain, compared to moderate class, patients in low class reported higher scores. In the logistic regression analysis, compared to high class, patients with lower income, higher comorbidity, higher CTX toxicity score, and higher levels of state anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbance were more likely to be in low AFI class. Compared to high class, patients with higher comorbidity and trait anxiety and lower morning energy were more likely to be in moderate AFI class. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the hypothesis that an increased risk for persistent cognitive decline is likely related to a variety of physical and psychological factors, for six of the nine symptoms, a "dose response" effect was observed with higher symptom severity scores associated with a progressive decline in attentional function.
Authors: Arti Hurria; Carol Rosen; Clifford Hudis; Enid Zuckerman; Katherine S Panageas; Mark S Lachs; Matthew Witmer; Wilfred G van Gorp; Monica Fornier; Gabriella D'Andrea; Mark Moasser; Chau Dang; Catherine Van Poznak; Anju Hurria; Jimmie Holland Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Arti Hurria; Shari Goldfarb; Carol Rosen; Jimmie Holland; Enid Zuckerman; Mark S Lachs; Matthew Witmer; Wilfred G van Gorp; Monica Fornier; Gabriella D'Andrea; Mark Moasser; Chau Dang; Catherine Van Poznak; Mark Robson; Violante E Currie; Maria Theodoulou; Larry Norton; Clifford Hudis Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2006-03-16 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: M Extermann; H Chen; A B Cantor; M B Corcoran; J Meyer; E Grendys; D Cavanaugh; S Antonek; A Camarata; W E Haley; L Balducci Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Inger Utne; Bruce A Cooper; Christine Ritchie; Melisa Wong; Laura B Dunn; Borghild Loyland; Ellen Karine Grov; Marilyn J Hammer; Steven M Paul; Jon D Levine; Yvette P Conley; Kord M Kober; Christine Miaskowski Journal: Eur J Oncol Nurs Date: 2020-08-03 Impact factor: 2.398
Authors: Carmen Kohler; Ming Chang; Yu-Yin Allemann-Su; Marcus Vetter; Miyeon Jung; Misook Jung; Yvette Conley; Steven Paul; Kord M Kober; Bruce A Cooper; Betty Smoot; Jon D Levine; Christine Miaskowski; Maria C Katapodi Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2020-01-15 Impact factor: 3.612