| Literature DB >> 31357659 |
Yupeng Mao1, Mailun Shen1, Bing Liu2, Lili Xing3, Song Chen4, Xinyu Xue5,6.
Abstract
Self-powered piezoelectric-biosensing textiles for the physiological monitoring and time-motion analysis of individual sports have been developed. The material system is composed of tetrapod-shaped ZnO nanowires on common textiles. The mechanism is based on the coupling of enzymatic reaction (LOx and lactate) and piezoelectric effect. After conformably attaching the device to the athlete, the device can monitor in real-time the moving speed, frequency, joint angle, and sweat lactate concentration of the athlete. The whole monitoring/analysis process is battery-free. The motor skills and physiological state of two athletes are investigated using the textiles, and different lactate threshold times and maximum lactate release capacities have been obtained. This technique can help them develop distinct training programs. This research is a new direction for the scientific monitoring of kinematics and may also stimulate the development of self-powered wearable sports-related systems.Entities:
Keywords: ZnO nanowires; biosensing; piezoelectric effect; sports physiological monitoring; time-motion analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31357659 PMCID: PMC6696300 DOI: 10.3390/s19153310
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1The experimental design of the self-powered piezoelectric-biosensing textiles. (a) The practical application. (b–e) Optical images and the experimental measurement setup.
Figure 2(a) SEM image of one single T-ZnO nanostructure. (b) High resolution TEM (HRTEM) image of one leg of T-ZnO. (c) XRD pattern of T-ZnO. (d) SEM image of the textiles (woven fabrics). (e) SEM image of T-ZnO/PVDF/fabric. (f) SEM image of T-ZnO/PVDF/fabric at high magnification. (g) The fabrication process.
Figure 3The piezoelectric output of self-powered textiles under applied deformation. (a) The bending deformation on the textiles. (b) The output piezoelectric voltage of the device at different bending angles (frequency is maintained at 1 Hz). (c,d) The relationship between piezoelectric voltage and bending angle. (e) The output piezoelectric voltage of the device at different frequencies (the bending angle is maintained at 56°). (f) The details of the voltage signal. (g) The relationship between piezoelectric voltage and frequency.
Figure 4Self-powered piezoelectric-biosensing textiles for detecting lactate concentration in aqueous solution. (a) The output piezoelectric voltage of the device (with LOx modification) at different lactate concentrations. (b) The details of the signal. (c) The response of the device (with LOx modification) against different lactate concentrations. (d) The output piezoelectric voltage of the device (without LOx modification) at different lactate concentrations. (e) The response of the device (without LOx modification) against different lactate concentrations. (f) The output piezoelectric voltage of the device upon adding pure water. (g) The selectivity of the self-powered piezoelectric-biosensing textiles.
Figure 5Self-powered piezoelectric-biosensing textiles for monitoring running speed and the physiological state of individual athletes. (a) The textiles attached to the two athletes (on the treadmill) for testing. (b–d) Real-time monitoring testers A and B. (e) The lactate concentration measured by the self-powered piezoelectric-biosensing textiles and commercial meter, respectively.
Figure 6Self-powered piezoelectric-biosensing textiles for sweat-lactate analysis. (a) The relationship between the speed and sweat lactate concentration (measured by a commercial meter) for tester A. (b) The relationship between speed (lactate concentration) and output piezoelectric voltage of the device on tester A. (c,d) The experimental data for tester B. (e) Working mechanism diagram.
Testers’ physiological status and training recommendations. LT, lactate threshold.
| Tester A | Tester B | |
|---|---|---|
| LT appearance time | 30 min | 25 min |
| Linear range | 0–21.64 mmol/L | 0–8.53 mmol/L |
| Response range | 0%–190.5% | 0%–69.8% |
| Training advice | Interval training method: | Continuous training method: |