| Literature DB >> 31357647 |
Natalia L Calvo1,2, Sruthi Sreekumar3, Laura A Svetaz4, María C Lamas1,5, Bruno M Moerschbacher6, Darío Leonardi7,8.
Abstract
Among different Candida species triggering vaginal candidiasis, Candida albicans is the most predominant yeast. It is commonly treated using azole drugs such as Tioconazole (TIO) and Econazole (ECO). However, their low water solubility may affect their therapeutic efficiency. Therefore, the aim of this research was to produce a novel chitosan nanocapsule based delivery system comprising of TIO or ECO and to study their suitability in vaginal application. These systems were characterized by their physicochemical properties, encapsulation efficiency, in vitro release, storage stability, cytotoxicity, and in vitro biological activity. Both nanocapsules loaded with TIO (average hydrodynamic size of 146.8 ± 0.8 nm, zeta potential of +24.7 ± 1.1 mV) or ECO (average hydrodynamic size of 127.1 ± 1.5 nm, zeta potential of +33.0 ± 1.0 mV) showed excellent association efficiency (99% for TIO and 87% for ECO). The analysis of size, polydispersity index, and zeta potential of the systems at 4, 25, and 37 °C (over a period of two months) showed the stability of the systems. Finally, the developed nanosystems presented fungicidal activity against C. albicans at non-toxic concentrations (studied on model human skin cells). The results obtained from this study are the first step in the development of a pharmaceutical dosage form suitable for the treatment of vaginal candidiasis.Entities:
Keywords: anti-fungal; biological activity; chitosan nanocapsules; drug delivery; econazole nitrate; tioconazole; vaginal candidiasis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31357647 PMCID: PMC6695956 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20153686
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Chemical structure of Tioconazole (A) and Econazole nitrate (B). ● Chiral center.
Characteristics of formulations (mean ± SD, n = 3).
| Sample | Nanoemulsions | Nanocapsules | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Size (nm) | PdI a | ζ (mV) b | Size (nm) | PdI a | ζ (mV) | Drug AE (%) c | ||
| Unloaded | 139.0 ± 3.8 | 0.170 ± 0.028 | −42.0 ± 4.5 | 131.7 ± 0.5 | 0.103 ± 0.004 | +46.0 ± 0.7 | - | |
| ECO 2 mM | 1312 ± 131 | 0.763 ± 0.06 | +1.48 ± 1.6 | 127.1 ± 1.5 | 0.107 ± 0.017 | +33.0 ± 1.0 | 87.2 ± 6.1 | |
| TIO 5 mM | 2215 ± 1348 | 0.9 ± 0.173 | −5.19 ± 1.3 | 146.8 ± 0.8 | 0.079 ± 0.019 | +24.7 ± 1.1 | 99.0 ± 0.8 | |
a Polydispersity Index. b Zeta potential. c Drug Association Efficiency (%) = [(Conc. drugtotal − Conc. drugunloaded) / (Conc. drugtotal)] × 100.
Figure 2Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of nanocapsules (A) unloaded (B) NC_TIO (C) NC_ECO. Scale bar: 500 nm.
Figure 3Evolution of the size (Z-average diameter), polydispersity index (PdI), and derived count rate (DCR) with time of drug-loaded nanocapsules (NC) incubated at 37 °C in simulated vaginal fluid (SVF) and acetate buffer. Data shown are means ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 4Release curve of (A) Tioconazole (TIO) and nanocapsules loaded with TIO (NC_TIO) and (B) Econazole (ECO) and nanocapsules loaded with ECO (NC_ECO) in SVF. Data shown are means ± SD (n = 3).
Kinetic parameters obtained after fitting curves for different release models to the release data from the NC_TIO.
| Formulation | Model | Parameters a | R2adj | AIC | MSC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC_TIO | Zero-order |
| 0.511 | 0.6047 | 54.7691 | 0.6292 |
| Higuchi |
| 3.282 | 0.9247 | 38.1915 | 2.2870 | |
| First-order |
| 0.006 | 0.6418 | 53.7831 | 0.7278 | |
| Korsmeyer-Peppas |
| 4.230 | 0.9334 | 37.7848 | 2.3276 | |
|
| 0.421 | |||||
| Hixson-Crowell |
| 0.002 | 0.6295 | 54.1226 | 0.6939 | |
| Weibull |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
| |||||
Numbers in bold indicate that these values are the most relevant. a K zero order release constant. K Higuchi release constant. K first order release constant. K Korsmeyer-Peppas release constant. n diffusional exponent. K Hixson-Crowell release constant. α scaling parameter. β shape parameter. T location parameter.
Kinetic parameters obtained after fitting the release data from the NC_ECO to different release models.
| Formulation | Model | Parameters a | R2adj | AIC | MSC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC_ECO | Zero-order |
| 0.277 | 0.7961 | 35.7050 | 1.3082 |
| Higuchi |
|
|
|
|
| |
| First-order |
| 0.003 | 0.8126 | 34.8618 | 1.3925 | |
| Korsmeyer-Peppas |
| 1.681 | 0.9836 | 11.3412 | 3.7446 | |
|
| 0.506 | |||||
| Hixson-Crowell |
| 0.001 | 0.8072 | 35.1482 | 1.3639 | |
| Weibull |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
| |||||
Numbers in bold indicate that these values are the most relevant.
Figure 5Evolution of size (Z-average diameter) and PdI over time of drug-loaded and unloaded (blank) NC incubated at 4, 25, and 37 °C. Data shown are means ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 6Evolution of the ζ potential over time of drug-loaded and unloaded (blank) NC incubated at 4, 25, and 37 °C. Data shown are means ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 7In vitro cytotoxicity of drug-loaded chitosan NC on human keratinocyte cell line (HaCaT) cells in 96-well plates determined using the MTT assay after 24 h. Eight replicates were performed for each treatment. Data shown are means ± SD (n = 3).
MIC and MFC (µg/mL) of the systems against C. albicans.
| Sample | MIC (24 h) | MFC (24 h) | MFC (48 h) |
|---|---|---|---|
| TIO | 1.52 | 24.25 | 6.06 |
| NC_TIO | 1.52 | 48.50 | 3.03 |
| ECO | 3.03 | 24.25 | 3.03 |
| NC_ECO | 3.03 | 48.50 | 3.03 |
MIC = Minimum Inhibitory Concentration; MFC = Minimum Fungicidal Concentration.
Figure 8C. albicans surviving at each time point when treated with different formulations. Data shown are means ± SD (n = 3).