| Literature DB >> 31357576 |
Carla Minoia1, Vincenza de Fazio1, Giovanni Scognamillo2, Anna Scattone3, Nicola Maggialetti4, Cristina Ferrari5, Attilio Guarini1.
Abstract
Myeloid sarcoma (MS) represents a rare disease with an adverse clinical outcome for patients not candidate to acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-like chemotherapies. Here we present the case of an elderly patient affected by a bilateral breast localization of MS treated with the hypomethylating agent decitabine associated to radiotherapy. The association of the two treatment modalities has allowed an optimal and long-lasting disease control.Entities:
Keywords: acute myeloid; breast; decitabine; extramedullary; leukemia; myeloid; sarcoma
Year: 2019 PMID: 31357576 PMCID: PMC6787642 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics9030084
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) ISSN: 2075-4418
Figure 1(A) Isolated myeloid sarcoma (MS) involving the right breast (40×, H&E): Diffuse infiltration by blasts with occasional eosinophils. (B) The neoplastic cells show immunoreactivity for CD34 (40×). (C) Anti-TdT immunohistochemical staining (20×). (D) Fine-needle biopsy confirmed the presence of a monotonous population of blasts diagnosis of MS involving the left breast (20×, H&E).
Figure 218F-FDG-PET/CT examinations performed in a patient affected with breast MS: axial (A,D) PET, (B,E) CT and (C,F) fusion images. (A–C) Baseline 18F-FDG-PET/CT shows bilateral multi-focal breast lesions with increased 18F-FDG uptake (SUV max 5.4) (red arrows). (D–F) Post-radiotherapy 18F-FDG-PET/CT demonstrates disappeared of the metabolically active lesions previously described (red arrows) and complete response to therapy.
Figure 3Radiotherapy was performed bilaterally by two opposing fields of 6 MeV photons by Linac D-2300 CD Varian (Palo Alto, CA, USA). The irradiation was administered after placement of a 0.5 cm thick bolus on each breast to limit drastically the “build-up” effect and then insert the skin into the clinical target volume (CTV). A total dose of 30 Gy on each breast was administered. Organ at risk’s dose was reduced to minimize to toxic effects (2.5 Gy to 20% of the right lung; 1.5 Gy to 20% of the left lung; and heart mean dose 1.018 Gy and maximum dose 11.731 Gy).
Reports of patients treated with decitabine for MS.
| Reference | Number of Patients | MS Localization | Number of Cycles | Response | OS (Months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Singh SN et al., 2012 [ | 1 | Lymph node/relapse post HSCT | 13 | CR | 26 |
| Modi G et al., 2015 [ | 1 | Vagina | 4/ | PR | 4, alive |
| Gornicec M et al., 2017 [ | 3 | Ear | 9 | Progression to AML | 14 |
| Skin | 6 | Progression to AML | 8 | ||
| Skin/relapse | 3/ | CR | 3, alive | ||
| Evers D et al., 2018 [ | 1 | Pericardium/relapse post HSCT | 6 + DLI | PR | 6, alive |
| Castelli A et al., 2018 [ | 1 | Skin + BM/relapse post HSCT | 8 | PR | 8 |
| Minoia C et al., 2019 | 1 | Bilateral breast | 22/ | CR | 27, alive |
OS, overall survival; HSCT, allogeneic hematopoieicstem cell transplant; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; DLI, donor lymphocyte infusions.