| Literature DB >> 31356600 |
Choon Mee Kim1, Ji Won Seo2, Dong Min Kim3, Na Ra Yun3, Jung Wook Park4, Jae Keun Chung4, Hyun Jae Song5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study investigated Borrelia species prevalence in ticks from vegetation, through a molecular method, in Gwangju Metropolitan City, South Korea. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31356600 PMCID: PMC6663023 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220465
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Oligonucleotide primers and PCR conditions used in this study.
| Target gene | Primer name (sequence) | Annealing temperature (°C) | Product size (bp) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45 | 801 | [ | ||
| 49 | 707 | [ | ||
| 52 | 427 | [ | ||
| 52 | 314 | [ | ||
| 55 | 976 | This study | ||
| 56 | 701 | This study | ||
| 56 | 901 | This study | ||
| 55 | 707 | This study | ||
| 16S rRNA | 55 | 453 | [ |
apyrG, CTP synthase gene; ospA, outer surface protein A gene; flaB, flagellin gene; 16S rRNA, 16S ribosomal RNA gene
Borrelia species identified by nested PCR for pyrG, ospA, and flaB in collected tick species.
| Tick species | Ticks examined | Ticks with | Ticks with | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage | No. | Confirmed No. (%) | Confirmed No. (%) | |||||||
| Adult | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Nymph | 362 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Larva | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Adult | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Nymph | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Adult | 25 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 (4) | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 (12) | |
| Adult | 88 | 1 | 1 | 1 (1.14) | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 (3.41) | ||
| Total | 484 | 1 | 1 | 1 (0.21) | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 (0.62) | ||
Fig 1Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA partial sequences (354 bp) from GenBank and Borrelia-positive tick specimens collected in this study (▶).
Scale bars indicate 0.02 base substitutions per site. GenBank accession numbers are shown in the tree.
Fig 2Phylogenetic tree based on partial pyrG sequences (A, 675 bp) and flaB sequences (B, 660 bp) from GenBank and Borrelia-positive tick specimens collected in this study (▶).
Scale bars indicate 0.02 base substitutions per site. GenBank accession numbers are shown in the tree.