| Literature DB >> 25111141 |
Ai Takano1, Kochi Toyomane2, Satoru Konnai2, Kazuhiko Ohashi2, Minoru Nakao3, Takuya Ito4, Masako Andoh5, Ken Maeda1, Masahisa Watarai1, Kozue Sato6, Hiroki Kawabata7.
Abstract
During 2012-2013, a total of 4325 host-seeking adult ticks belonging to the genus Ixodes were collected from various localities of Hokkaido, the northernmost island of Japan. Tick lysates were subjected to real-time PCR assay to detect borrelial infection. The assay was designed for specific detection of the Relapsing fever spirochete Borrelia miyamotoi and for unspecific detection of Lyme disease-related spirochetes. Overall prevalence of B. miyamotoi was 2% (71/3532) in Ixodes persulcatus, 4.3% (5/117) in Ixodes pavlovskyi and 0.1% (1/676) in Ixodes ovatus. The prevalence in I. persulcatus and I. pavlovskyi ticks were significantly higher than in I. ovatus. Co-infections with Lyme disease-related spirochetes were found in all of the tick species. During this investigation, we obtained 6 isolates of B. miyamotoi from I. persulcatus and I. pavlovskyi by culture in BSK-M medium. Phylogenetic trees of B. miyamotoi inferred from each of 3 housekeeping genes (glpQ, 16S rDNA, and flaB) demonstrated that the Hokkaido isolates were clustered with Russian B. miyamotoi, but were distinguishable from North American and European B. miyamotoi. A multilocus sequence analysis using 8 genes (clpA, clpX, nifS, pepX, pyrG, recG, rplB, and uvrA) suggested that all Japanese B. miyamotoi isolates, including past isolates, were genetically clonal, although these were isolated from different tick and vertebrate sources. From these results, B. miyamotoi-infected ticks are widely distributed throughout Hokkaido. Female I. persulcatus are responsible for most human tick-bites, thereby I. persulcatus is likely the most important vector of indigenous relapsing fever from tick bites in Hokkaido.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25111141 PMCID: PMC4128717 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104532
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Tick collection sites in this study.
Ticks were collected in the areas shown by black dots. The gray shading shows district where ticks were collected during this investigation (see Table 1).
Prevalence of borreliae in ticks.
| Location in Hokkaido | Tick species | Tick Number |
| LD borreliae positive No. (%) | |||||||
| Male | Female | Total | Male | Female | Total | Male | Female | Total | |||
| North | Souya |
| 223 | 266 | 489 | 6 (2.7) | 5 (1.9) | 11 (2.2) | 42 (18.8) | 61 (22.9) | 103 (21.1) |
|
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
| Rumoi |
| 13 | 14 | 27 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 4 (30.8) | 5 (35.7) | 9 (33.3) | |
|
| 3 | 21 | 24 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (33.3) | 11 (52.4) | 12 (50) | ||
| Kamikawa |
| 499 | 986 | 1485 | 5 (1) | 20 (2) | 25 (1.7) | 165 (33.1) | 308 (31.2) | 473 (31.9) | |
|
| 25 | 24 | 49 | 1 (4) | 2 (8.3) | 3 (6.1) | 7 (28) | 4 (16.7) | 11 (22.4) | ||
|
| 40 | 401 | 441 | 1 (2.5) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.2) | 18 (45) | 144 (35.9) | 162 (36.7) | ||
| East | Abashiri |
| 250 | 280 | 530 | 7 (2.8) | 9 (3.2) | 16 (3) | 107 (42.8) | 123 (43.9) | 230 (43.4) |
|
| 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (33.3) | 1 (33.3) | ||
|
| 12 | 54 | 66 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 7 (58.3) | 32 (59.3) | 39 (59.1) | ||
| Nemuro |
| 91 | 95 | 186 | 1 (1.1) | 2 (2.1) | 3 (1.6) | 24 (26.4) | 23 (24.2) | 47 (25.3) | |
| Kushiro |
| 143 | 186 | 329 | 0 (0) | 6 (3.2) | 6 (1.8) | 60 (42) | 79 (42.5) | 139 (42.2) | |
| Tokachi |
| 76 | 72 | 148 | 1 (1.3) | 3 (4.2) | 4 (2.7) | 17 (22.4) | 21 (29.2) | 38 (25.7) | |
|
| 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
|
| 44 | 101 | 145 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 26 (59.1) | 49 (48.5) | 75 (51.7) | ||
| Central | Sorachi |
| 67 | 73 | 140 | 0 (0) | 2 (2.7) | 2 (1.4) | 6 (9) | 13 (17.8) | 19 (13.6) |
| Hidaka |
| 7 | 9 | 16 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (14.3) | 1 (11.1) | 2 (12.5) | |
| Ishikari |
| 63 | 116 | 179 | 0 (0) | 4 (3.4) | 4 (2.2) | 14 (22.2) | 35 (30.2) | 49 (27.4) | |
|
| 40 | 21 | 61 | 2 (5) | 0 (0) | 2 (3.3) | 3 (7.5) | 3 (14.3) | 6 (9.8) | ||
| South | Oshima |
| 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) |
| Total |
| 1434 | 2098 | 3532 | 20 (1.4) | 51 (2.4) | 71 (2) | 444 (31) | 674 (32.1) | 1118 (31.7) | |
|
| 66 | 51 | 117 | 3 (4.5) | 2 (3.9) | 5 (4.3) | 10 (15.2) | 8 (15.7) | 18 (15.4) | ||
|
| 99 | 577 | 676 | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.1) | 52 (52.5) | 236 (40.9) | 288 (42.6) | ||
*The numbers include mixed infections.
Figure 2The prevalence of B. miyamotoi and LD borreliae in Ixodes ticks in Hokkaido.
The asterisk shows significant difference: * P<0.01, by Fisher's exact test.
Borrelia miyamotoi strains used in this study.
| Strain name | Isolation source | Location | Isolated year | Reference |
| HT31T |
| Shiretoko, Hokkaido, Japan | 1990 | 1 |
| HT24 |
| Shiretoko, Hokkaido, Japan | 1990 | 1 |
| FR64b |
| Furano, Hokkaido, Japan | 1991 | 1 |
| Hk004 |
| Sibecha, Hokkaido, Japan | 1993 | 1 |
| NB103-1 |
| Nemuro, Hokkaido, Japan | 1991 | 1 |
| MYK1 |
| Shibetsu, Hokkaido, Japan | 2012 | in this study |
| MYK2 |
| Nayoro, Hokkaido, Japan | 2012 | in this study |
| MYK3 |
| Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan | 2012 | in this study |
| MYK4 |
| Simukapp, Hokkaido, Japan | 2012 | in this study |
| MYK5 |
| Takinoue, Hokkaido, Japan | 2012 | in this study |
| Y13T1 |
| Oumu, Hokkaido, Japan | 2013 | in this study |
Figure 3Phylogenetic analysis of RF borreliae based on 16 S rDNA of Borrelia spp.
The phylogenetic tree of 16 S rDNA was constructed. The phylogenetic branches were supported in >70% by the bootstrap analysis. The bar indicates the percentage of sequence divergence. Sequences in this study were shown in bold type. If possible, clone or strain name, isolation source, and country were described in the case of B. miyamotoi. Numbers in parentheses indicate Accession Numbers in GenBank.