Literature DB >> 31356423

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients 70 Years and Older With Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis and an Intact Rotator Cuff.

Melissa A Wright1, Jay D Keener, Aaron M Chamberlain.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: As the indications for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) expand beyond traditional cuff tear arthropathy, the role of RSA in elderly patients with glenohumeral arthritis and an intact rotator cuff remains unclear.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 135 patients who underwent RSA or total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) at a single tertiary orthopedic center between 2005 and 2015 and were 70 years of age or older at the time of surgery. All patients had preoperative advanced imaging confirming an intact rotator cuff but active forward elevation less than 90°. Complications, reoperations, and patient survival were recorded from the medical record. Patient-reported outcomes (Pain visual analog scale, Satisfaction Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES], and Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder [WOOS]) and patient-reported range of motion were collected at a minimum of 2 years after procedure.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in complication rate or revision surgery rate between patients undergoing TSA and RSA (complications 13.7% versus 12.1%, P = 0.810; reoperations 6.9% vs 3.0%, P = 0.418). There were no differences in patient-reported outcome measures between the two groups. Mean pain visual analog scale scores were low in both groups (0.72, SD 1.93 for TSA and 0.31, SD 0.72 for RSA). Satisfaction scores were high (86.1, SD 23.3 for TSA and 91.8, SD 9.0 for RSA, P = 0.286). Mean ASES and WOOS scores were also high in both groups (86 [SD 15.6] for TSA and 83 [SD 12.6] for RSA for ASES [P = 0.400] and 86 [SD 18.3] for TSA and 89 [SD 10.2] for RSA for WOOS [P = 0.400]). One hundred percent of subjects following RSA and 98% of subjects following TSA rated their forward elevation as full or nearly full (>135°) (P = 0.516). DISCUSSION: Given the good clinical outcomes after both TSA and RSA, there may be an increased role for RSA in this elderly cohort to provide effective treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 31356423     DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  17 in total

1.  Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCID) for the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS) and the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS).

Authors:  Marc Randall Kristensen Nyring; Bo Sanderhoff Olsen; Alexander Amundsen; Jeppe Vejlgaard Rasmussen
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2021-09-22

2.  Risk Factors for Blood Transfusions in Primary Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Danny Lee; Ryan Lee; Safa C Fassihi; Monica Stadecker; Jessica H Heyer; Seth Stake; Kyla Rakoczy; Thomas Rodenhouse; Rajeev Pandarinath
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2022-06

3.  Return of Scapulohumeral Rhythm in Patients After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Midterm Stereoradiographic Imaging Analysis.

Authors:  Shannon E Linderman; James R L Hall; Joshua E Johnson; Andrea P Caceres; Carolyn M Hettrich; Donald D Anderson
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2022-06

4.  CORR Insights®: A Comparison of Revision Rates for Osteoarthritis of Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty to Primary Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty with a Cemented All- polyethylene Glenoid: Analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

Authors:  Eric T Ricchetti
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  CORR Insights®: Is Advanced Imaging to Assess Rotator Cuff Integrity Before Shoulder Arthroplasty Cost-effective? A Decision Modeling Study.

Authors:  Uma Srikumaran
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  Is Advanced Imaging to Assess Rotator Cuff Integrity Before Shoulder Arthroplasty Cost-effective? A Decision Modeling Study.

Authors:  Jay M Levin; John Wickman; Alexander L Lazarides; Daniel J Cunningham; Daniel E Goltz; Richard C Mather; Oke Anakwenze; Tally E Lassiter; Christopher S Klifto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  Anatomic versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a mid-term follow-up comparison.

Authors:  Bradley S Schoch; Joseph J King; Joseph Zuckerman; Thomas W Wright; Chris Roche; Pierre-Henri Flurin
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-05-16

8.  Arthroscopic management of glenohumeral arthritis in the young patient does not negatively impact the outcome of subsequent anatomic shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Corey J Schiffman; Anastasia J Whitson; Sagar S Chawla; Frederick A Matsen; Jason E Hsu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Comparison of survivorship and performance of a platform shoulder system in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pierre Henri Flurin; Carl Tams; Ryan W Simovitch; Christopher Knudsen; Christopher Roche; Thomas W Wright; Joseph Zuckerman; Bradley S Schoch
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-07-27

Review 10.  The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part II.

Authors:  Sarav S Shah; Alexander M Roche; Spencer W Sullivan; Benjamin T Gaal; Stewart Dalton; Arjun Sharma; Joseph J King; Brian M Grawe; Surena Namdari; Macy Lawler; Joshua Helmkamp; Grant E Garrigues; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Kyle Flik; Randall J Otto; Richard Jones; Andrew Jawa; Peter McCann; Joseph Abboud; Gabe Horneff; Glen Ross; Richard Friedman; Eric T Ricchetti; Douglas Boardman; Robert Z Tashjian; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-09-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.