Literature DB >> 34590336

Characteristics of people with dementia lost to follow-up from a dementia care center.

Nicole D Boyd1, Georges Naasan2,3,4, Krista L Harrison1,2,5, Sarah B Garrett2,5, Talita D'Aguiar Rosa2,6, Brenda Pérez-Cerpa2,7, Shamiel McFarlane2, Bruce L Miller2,3, Christine S Ritchie1,2,8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the prevalence and characteristics of people living with dementia (PLWD) lost to follow-up (LTFU) from a specialized dementia care clinic and to understand factors influencing patient follow-up status.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of PLWD seen at a dementia care clinic 2012-2017 who were deceased as of 2018 (n = 746). Participants were evaluated for follow-up status at the time of death. Generalized linear regression was used to analyze demographic and diagnostic characteristics by follow-up status. Text extracted from participant medical records was analyzed using qualitative content analysis to identify reasons patients became LTFU.
RESULTS: Among PLWD seen at a dementia care clinic, 42% became LTFU before death, 39% of whom had chart documentation describing reasons for loss to follow-up. Increased rates of LTFU were associated with female sex (risk ratio 1.27, [95% confidence interval 1.09-1.49]; p = 0.003), educational attainment of high school or less (1.34, [1.13-1.61]; p = 0.001), and death in a long-term care facility (1.46, [1.19-1.80]; p = 0.003). Commonly documented reasons for not returning for care at the clinic included switching care to another provider (42%), logistical difficulty accessing care (26%), patient-family decision to discontinue care (24%), and functional challenges in accessing care (23%).
CONCLUSIONS: PLWD are LTFU from specialized memory care at high rates. Attention to care coordination, patient-provider communication, and integrated use of alternative care models such as telehealth are potential strategies to improve care.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  access to care; ambulatory; care coordination; continuity of care; dementia; end-of-life; lost to follow-up; memory care; mixed methods; outpatient

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34590336      PMCID: PMC8740544          DOI: 10.1002/gps.5628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry        ISSN: 0885-6230            Impact factor:   3.485


  34 in total

1.  Finding dementia in primary care: the results of a clinical demonstration project.

Authors:  John Riley McCarten; Pauline Anderson; Michael A Kuskowski; Susan E McPherson; Soo Borson; Maurice W Dysken
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 2.  Memory clinics.

Authors:  D Jolley; S M Benbow; M Grizzell
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Health Care Utilization and Cost Outcomes of a Comprehensive Dementia Care Program for Medicare Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Lee A Jennings; Alison M Laffan; Anna C Schlissel; Erin Colligan; Zaldy Tan; Neil S Wenger; David B Reuben
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Effect of Collaborative Dementia Care via Telephone and Internet on Quality of Life, Caregiver Well-being, and Health Care Use: The Care Ecosystem Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Katherine L Possin; Jennifer J Merrilees; Sarah Dulaney; Stephen J Bonasera; Winston Chiong; Kirby Lee; Sarah M Hooper; Isabel Elaine Allen; Tamara Braley; Alissa Bernstein; Talita D Rosa; Krista Harrison; Hailey Begert-Hellings; John Kornak; James G Kahn; Georges Naasan; Serggio Lanata; Amy M Clark; Anna Chodos; Rosalie Gearhart; Christine Ritchie; Bruce L Miller
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 5.  Why caregivers of people with dementia and memory loss don't use services.

Authors:  Henry Brodaty; Cathy Thomson; Claire Thompson; Michael Fine
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.485

6.  Advancing Research on Care Needs and Supportive Approaches for Persons With Dementia: Recommendations and Rationale.

Authors:  Ann Kolanowski; Richard H Fortinsky; Margaret Calkins; Davangere P Devanand; Elizabeth Gould; Tamar Heller; Nancy A Hodgson; Helen C Kales; Jeffrey Kaye; Constantine Lyketsos; Barbara Resnick; Melanie Schicker; Sheryl Zimmerman
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 4.669

7.  Barriers to telehealth access among homebound older adults.

Authors:  Alexander V Kalicki; Kate A Moody; Emily Franzosa; Peter M Gliatto; Katherine A Ornstein
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 7.538

Review 8.  The preferences and perspectives of family caregivers towards place of care for their relatives at the end-of-life. A systematic review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative evidence.

Authors:  Caroline Woodman; Jessica Baillie; Stephanie Sivell
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.568

Review 9.  Prevalence and determinants of undetected dementia in the community: a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Linda Lang; Angela Clifford; Li Wei; Dongmei Zhang; Daryl Leung; Glenda Augustine; Isaac M Danat; Weiju Zhou; John R Copeland; Kaarin J Anstey; Ruoling Chen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Impact of nursing home admission on health care use and disease status elderly dependent people one year before and one year after skilled nursing home admission based on 2012-2013 SNIIRAM data.

Authors:  A Atramont; I Bourdel-Marchasson; D Bonnet-Zamponi; I Tangre; A Fagot-Campagna; P Tuppin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  1 in total

1.  Developing neuropalliative care for sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease.

Authors:  Krista L Harrison; Sarah B Garrett; Joni Gilissen; Michael J Terranova; Alissa Bernstein Sideman; Christine S Ritchie; Michael D Geschwind
Journal:  Prion       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 3.931

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.