Literature DB >> 31354058

Jargon as a barrier to effective science communication: Evidence from metacognition.

Olivia M Bullock1, Daniel Colón Amill1, Hillary C Shulman1, Graham N Dixon1.   

Abstract

In this experiment (N = 650), we examine the negative consequences of jargon on individuals' perceptions of emerging scientific technology and aim to explain these effects. We find that the presence of jargon impairs people's ability to process scientific information, and that this impairment leads to greater motivated resistance to persuasion, increased risk perceptions, and lower support for technology adoption. These findings suggest that the use of jargon undermines efforts to inform and persuade the public through the cognitive mechanism of metacognition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  metacognition; persuasion; processing fluency; science communication

Year:  2019        PMID: 31354058     DOI: 10.1177/0963662519865687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Underst Sci        ISSN: 0963-6625


  4 in total

1.  Engaged communication of environmental health science: Processes and outcomes of urban academic-community partnerships.

Authors:  Carrie Leach; N Schroeck; J Blessman; V Rorai; M Cooper-Sargent; P A Lichtenberg; C J Trentacosta
Journal:  Appl Environ Educ Commun       Date:  2021-06-07

2.  The predictive utility of word familiarity for online engagements and funding.

Authors:  David M Markowitz; Hillary C Shulman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Don't dumb it down: The effects of jargon in COVID-19 crisis communication.

Authors:  Hillary C Shulman; Olivia M Bullock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Expert communication on Twitter: Comparing economists' and scientists' social networks, topics and communicative styles.

Authors:  Marina Della Giusta; Sylvia Jaworska; Danica Vukadinović Greetham
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2020-09-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.