Felice D'Antuono1, Serena De Luca2, Pier Paolo Mainenti3, Carmine Mollica3, Luigi Camera2, Gennaro Galizia4, Arturo Brunetti2, Simone Maurea2. 1. Dipartimento Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Università di Napoli Federico II, via Pansini, 5, 80131 Napoli, Italy. felixdant@hotmail.it. 2. Dipartimento Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Università di Napoli Federico II, via Pansini, 5, 80131 Napoli, Italy. 3. Istituto di Biostrutture e Bioimmagini (IBB), Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Naples, Italy. 4. Division of GI Tract Surgical Oncology, Department of Cardio-Thoracic and Respiratory Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) findings in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) to establish tumour resectability. METHODS: Thirty patients (22 M, 8 F) with pathologically proven CCA by post-surgical specimens (n = 20), core biopsy (n = 6) or cytology (n = 4) underwent both MDCT and MRI with MRCP. CCA lesions were classified on the basis of anatomical locations in intra-hepatic (iCCA), peri-hilar (pCCA) and distal (dCCA) tumours. Morphological tumour pattern, lesion size, biliary dilatation, tumour contrast enhancement type, lymph node involvement and vascular infiltration were directly compared between MDCT and MRI with MRCP. As a rule, a tumour resectability judgement for each patient was formulated by both imaging techniques comparing imaging results with direct surgical assessment (n = 20) or interventional procedures (n = 10). RESULTS: In terms of anatomical location, 14 iCCA, 8 pCCA and 8 dCCA were observed; both imaging techniques were concordant about the identification and morphological characterization of tumour lesions and in the evaluation of tumour features (lesion size, contrast enhancement pattern, capsular retraction, biliary dilatation, lymph node involvement and vascular infiltration) as well as in assessing lesion resectability; an excellent agreement (k = 1) for the assessment of all the parameters included in imaging analysis was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The comparative concordant results of our study suggest that MRI with MRCP represents a valid alternative to MDCT for the diagnostic evaluation of patients with CCA to establish tumour resectability providing multiplanar scanning of high-contrast imaging quality; MDCT should be preferred in uncooperative patients, in the presence of biliary stents or when MRI is absolutely contraindicated for incompatible medical devices.
PURPOSE: To compare multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) findings in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) to establish tumour resectability. METHODS: Thirty patients (22 M, 8 F) with pathologically proven CCA by post-surgical specimens (n = 20), core biopsy (n = 6) or cytology (n = 4) underwent both MDCT and MRI with MRCP. CCA lesions were classified on the basis of anatomical locations in intra-hepatic (iCCA), peri-hilar (pCCA) and distal (dCCA) tumours. Morphological tumour pattern, lesion size, biliary dilatation, tumour contrast enhancement type, lymph node involvement and vascular infiltration were directly compared between MDCT and MRI with MRCP. As a rule, a tumour resectability judgement for each patient was formulated by both imaging techniques comparing imaging results with direct surgical assessment (n = 20) or interventional procedures (n = 10). RESULTS: In terms of anatomical location, 14 iCCA, 8 pCCA and 8 dCCA were observed; both imaging techniques were concordant about the identification and morphological characterization of tumour lesions and in the evaluation of tumour features (lesion size, contrast enhancement pattern, capsular retraction, biliary dilatation, lymph node involvement and vascular infiltration) as well as in assessing lesion resectability; an excellent agreement (k = 1) for the assessment of all the parameters included in imaging analysis was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The comparative concordant results of our study suggest that MRI with MRCP represents a valid alternative to MDCT for the diagnostic evaluation of patients with CCA to establish tumour resectability providing multiplanar scanning of high-contrast imaging quality; MDCT should be preferred in uncooperative patients, in the presence of biliary stents or when MRI is absolutely contraindicated for incompatible medical devices.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bile ducts; Cholangiocarcinoma; Comparative study; Computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging