| Literature DB >> 31353221 |
Jane Guan1, Wei Zhou1, Marc Hafner2, Robert A Blake3, Cecile Chalouni4, Irene P Chen5, Tom De Bruyn6, Jennifer M Giltnane4, Steven J Hartman7, Amy Heidersbach8, Rene Houtman9, Ellen Ingalla1, Lorn Kategaya10, Tracy Kleinheinz3, Jun Li11, Scott E Martin12, Zora Modrusan8, Michelle Nannini1, Jason Oeh1, Savita Ubhayakar5, Xiaojing Wang11, Ingrid E Wertz12, Amy Young1, Mamie Yu12, Deepak Sampath13, Jeffrey H Hager10, Lori S Friedman1, Anneleen Daemen2, Ciara Metcalfe14.
Abstract
Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancers frequently remain dependent on ER signaling even after acquiring resistance to endocrine agents, prompting the development of optimized ER antagonists. Fulvestrant is unique among approved ER therapeutics due to its capacity for full ER antagonism, thought to be achieved through ER degradation. The clinical potential of fulvestrant is limited by poor physicochemical features, spurring attempts to generate ER degraders with improved drug-like properties. We show that optimization of ER degradation does not guarantee full ER antagonism in breast cancer cells; ER "degraders" exhibit a spectrum of transcriptional activities and anti-proliferative potential. Mechanistically, we find that fulvestrant-like antagonists suppress ER transcriptional activity not by ER elimination, but by markedly slowing the intra-nuclear mobility of ER. Increased ER turnover occurs as a consequence of ER immobilization. These findings provide proof-of-concept that small molecule perturbation of transcription factor mobility may enable therapeutic targeting of this challenging target class.Entities:
Keywords: ER; SERD; breast cancer; chromatin; estrogen receptor; fulvestrant; immobilization; selective ER downregulator; transcription
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31353221 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell ISSN: 0092-8674 Impact factor: 41.582