Literature DB >> 31352686

Clinical measurements of normative subjective cyclotorsion and cyclofusion in a healthy adult population.

Sara Flodin1,2, Tony Pansell3, Agneta Rydberg3, Marita Andersson Grönlund1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate normative subjective cyclotorsion values and cyclofusion ranges in a healthy adult population.
METHODS: A cross-sectional investigation was performed in 120 healthy, non-strabismic adults, 60 men and 60 women in the age range of 18-69 years. All subjects were assessed for cyclotorsion using the synoptophore and the single Maddox rod (SMR) methods. Cyclofusion was investigated with the synoptophore in 60 of the subjects.
RESULTS: All age groups showed low values of subjective torsion, mainly excyclotorsion with mean values of -1 degree for both methods. Reference ranges of cyclotorsion were between -0.7 and -1.5 degrees for the SMR method and between -0.7 and -1.4 degrees using the synoptophore method. There were no significant differences between gender (p = 0.48), but the effect of age was significant for both methods (p = 0.026) demonstrating a slight increase in excyclotorsion with age. Cyclofusion showed a total mean amplitude of 16 degrees, the fusion range was +7 degrees of incyclotorsion to -9 degrees of excyclotorsion.
CONCLUSIONS: Subjective reference ranges for cyclotorsion and cyclofusion reveal that low values of torsion are to be expected upon clinical investigation in non-strabismic adult individuals. Values outside of the reference range may be indicators of possible binocular abnormalities or physiological variations. The cyclotorsional measurements and prevalence in this adult population group can be regarded as normative data in clinical settings.
© 2019 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cyclodeviation; cyclofusion; cyclotorsion; excyclotorsion; single maddox rod; standard reference range; synoptophore

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31352686     DOI: 10.1111/aos.14201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1755-375X            Impact factor:   3.761


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of subjective cyclofusion ranges and objective ocular torsion in normal participants according to age.

Authors:  Manami Kawai; Toshiaki Goseki; Takashi Okano; Hitoshi Ishikawa
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.535

2.  Comparison of Methods for Measuring Cyclodeviation.

Authors:  Laura Liebermann; Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Lindsay D Klaehn; Andrea M Kramer; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  A Novel Method for Evaluation of Ocular Torsion Angle by Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Katsuhide Yamadera; Hiroto Ishikawa; Ayame Imai; Mana Okamoto; Akiko Kimura; Osamu Mimura; Fumi Gomi
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.283

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.