Ling Zhu1, Qunli Wang2, Yi Hu2, Fan Wang2. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, The First People's Hospital of Jingmen, Jingmen, China. Email: LingzhuVIP@yeah.net. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, The Second People's Hospital of Jingmen, Jingmen, China.
Abstract
Objective: Period1 (PER1), a core circadian gene, not only modulates circadian rhythm but may also play an important role in other biological processes, including pathways involved in the proliferation and apoptosis of tumor cells. In this study, we investigated the mechanism by which the downregulated expression of PER1 promotes the apoptosis of wild-type P53 human glioma U343 cells exposed to X-rays. Methods: U343 cells were exposed to 6 mV 10 Gy X-ray irradiation after infection with an shRNA lentivirus to reduce the expression of PER1 and were analyzed by SCGE analysis, flow cytometry, qRT-PCR, and western blotting. Result: SCGE analysis revealed that compared with the controls, U343 cells expressing low levels of PER1 showed minor DNA damage when exposed to X-ray irradiation (P<0.05), and the flow cytometry assay showed lower death rates (P<0.05). RT-PCR and western blot analysis both revealed decreased expression of CHK2 and P53, which regulate DNA damage and repair via the CHK2-P53 pathway, and decreased expression of C-MYC, which is related to cell apoptosis. Conclusion: Our research suggests that PER1 may play an important role in tumor radiotherapy, which is attributable to enhanced chk2-P53 signaling and proapoptotic processes. These findings provide a new target for the clinical treatment of glioma and a reliable basis for postradiation therapy and gene therapy for glioma and other cancers.
Objective: Period1 (PER1), a core circadian gene, not only modulates circadian rhythm but may also play an important role in other biological processes, including pathways involved in the proliferation and apoptosis of tumor cells. In this study, we investigated the mechanism by which the downregulated expression of PER1 promotes the apoptosis of wild-type P53humangliomaU343 cells exposed to X-rays. Methods:U343 cells were exposed to 6 mV 10 Gy X-ray irradiation after infection with an shRNA lentivirus to reduce the expression of PER1 and were analyzed by SCGE analysis, flow cytometry, qRT-PCR, and western blotting. Result: SCGE analysis revealed that compared with the controls, U343 cells expressing low levels of PER1 showed minor DNA damage when exposed to X-ray irradiation (P<0.05), and the flow cytometry assay showed lower death rates (P<0.05). RT-PCR and western blot analysis both revealed decreased expression of CHK2 and P53, which regulate DNA damage and repair via the CHK2-P53 pathway, and decreased expression of C-MYC, which is related to cell apoptosis. Conclusion: Our research suggests that PER1 may play an important role in tumor radiotherapy, which is attributable to enhanced chk2-P53 signaling and proapoptotic processes. These findings provide a new target for the clinical treatment of glioma and a reliable basis for postradiation therapy and gene therapy for glioma and other cancers.
Entities:
Keywords:
Apoptosis; DNA damage; Glioma; per1; radiotherapy
The clinical management of malignant glioma is one of the most difficult treatments faced by the practicing neurologist. Patients have a very poor prognosis, largely because of the paucity of druggable targets responsive to therapeutic intervention. However, recent progress at the molecular level has identified candidate targets, many of which have the potential to become future treatment options.The Period1 (PER1) gene is an indispensable component of the mammalian circadian clock (Zheng et al., 2001). In 2002, the murine PER1 gene was reported to play an important role in tumorigenesis. A higher incidence of tumor development was observed in PER1-deficient mice than in wild-type mice (Yang et al., 2009). In addition, clear differences in PER1 expression are evident in tumor tissues and noninvolved peripheral tissues (Kolomeichuk et al., 2011; Savvidis et al., 2012; Winter et al., 2007; Xia et al., 2010; Gery et al., 2006). Elsewhere, lowered expression and/or mutations in the PER1 gene have been reported to correlate with enhanced tumor growth in breast cancer, colon cancer and lymphoma, corresponding with altered expression of P53 and the oncogenes BCLxl, BCL-2, cyclinB1, cyclin D, cyclin E and C-MYC (Mostafaie et al., 2009; Pluquet et al., 2013; Sato et al., 2011; Ye et al., 2015). PER1 has also been linked with DNA damage response pathways (Fu et al., 2016). X-ray-induced DNA damage in tumor cell lines with mutated PER1 exhibited an increased sensitivity to damage affecting cell proliferation, apoptosis, and the P53 pathway (Yang et al., 2009; Hong et al., 2009). In addition, scholars have concluded that manipulation of Per1 levels influences both the transcription of a broad range of p53 target genes and the stability of endogenous p53 (Li et al., 2016). Simultaneously, they also established that Per1 directly acts on the p53 node, as checkpoint components upstream of p53 remained active in response to DNA damage. Quantitative transcriptional analyses of p53 target genes demonstrated that unbound p53 was absolutely required for the activation of the DNA-damage response (Dakup et al., 2016; McKenna et al., 2012).While it is evident that PER1 is critical to cell proliferation, apoptosis and the P53 pathway in neoplasia, although the mechanism remains poorly understood. Based upon previous studies, we examined the role of PER1 in the cellular response to X-ray-induced DNA damage in the humangliomaU343 cell model. RNA interference technology was used to downregulate the expression of PER1. We observed that U343 cells with low-level expression of PER1 exposed to low-dose X-ray irradiation exhibited minor DNA damage and a decreased death rate. Our data indicate that PER1 interacts with the P53 pathway and contributes to increased P53 activity, protecting DNA-damaged cells from P53-mediated apoptosis.
Materials and Methods
Cell lines and reagentsThe U343glioma cell line was purchased from Ji Ni Biotechnology Co. Ltd. (Guangzhou, China). Cells were maintained according to the supplier’s instructions and guidelines and were cultivated at 37°C in a 100% RH, 5% CO2, 95% air atmosphere. ShRNA-PER1 lentivirus was obtained from Genechem Chemical Technology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Oligonucleotide primer and probe sequences were designed and provided by Sangon Biotech Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit (Invitrogen, USA), Comet Assay for DNA Damage Detection Kit (KeyGEN Biotechnology, China), puromycin (Solarbio Technology Co. Ltd., China), and Maxima SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (Fermentas, USA) were used according to the manufacturers’ instructions.Transfection with shRNA lentivirusThe expression of PER1 was regulated using lentiviral transfection of shRNA. U343glioma cells were stably transformed with shRNA-PER1 and shRNA-control constructs according to the manufacturer’s protocol. U343 cells were plated in 6-well plates at a density of 2×104 cells/well in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco, USA) and allowed to attach for 18 h prior to transfection with shRNA lentivirus vectors. Cells were permitted to integrate for 24 h after infection. Puromycin (3 µg/ml) was added to select cells with the integrated retrovirus, and stable cell lines were established after one week. Interference sequences of shRNA-PER1 are shown as follows.X-ray irradiationThe three above-mentioned cell groups were exposed to 12.4 Gy/min, an exposure field of 25×25 cm2 and spacing of 80 cm, and an accumulated dose of 10 Gy X-rays (Varian Medical Systems Inc., California, USA).Expression of Per1 mRNA and Per1 Protein in U343HumanGlioma Cell Lines. Figure 1A, U343 cells expressing shRNA-control and shRNA-per1 were detected by real-time PCR. Figure 1B, Total cellular protein was isolated from U343glioma cells, and 40–60 µg was separated electrophoretically, transferred to nitrocellulose and subjected to western blot analysis with antibodies directed against the per1 proteins. U343 cells were cultivated in vitro under standard conditions. (A) TPA alone; (B) TPA and shRNA-control; and (C) TPA and shRNA-PER1Effect of X-ray Irradiation on the Expression of Per1 in U343HumanGlioma Tumor Cells. Figure 2A, Relative mRNA levels of per1 in U343 cells transfected with shRNA-control or shRNA-per1 were measured by QRT-PCR. Figure 2B, Total cellular protein was isolated from U343humanglioma cells before and after exposure to X-ray irradiation. Then, 40–60 µg of total cellular protein was electrophoretically separated, transferred to nitrocellulose and subjected to western blot analysis using antibodies directed against PER1 protein. β-actin was used as a loading control. (A) TPA alone; (B) TPA and shRNA-control; and (C) TPA and shRNA-PER1X-ray Irradiation Increases Apoptosis in U343Glioma Cells after the Downregulation of PER1. Following treatment with irradiation and staining with Hoechst 33,342, cells were subjected to flow cytometry analysis to determine the proportion of apoptotic cells. (A) TPA alone; (B) TPA and shRNA-control; and (C) TPA and shRNA-PER1. TPA indicates tissue plasminogen activatorSingle-Cell Gel Electrophoresis (SCGE) Analysis of X-ray (10 Gy)-Induced DNA Damage in U343 Cells.DNA damage repair capacity assessed via the comet assay.(A) TPA alone; (B) TPA and shRNA-control; and (C) TPA and shRNA-PER1.This response was statistically significant (P<0.05; n=3)Effect of sh-RNA-per1 on ATM, TP53 and C-MYC mRNA and Protein Expression in U343HumanGlioma Tumor Cell Lines Following Irradiation. Figure 5A,Relative mRNA levels were determined by qRT-PCR. Data are expressed as ΔΔCT relative to the control.Figure 5B, Total U343glioma cell extracts were examined by quantitative western blotting at 24 h after exposure to 10 Gy X-ray irradiation. Antibodies were specific for ATM, CHK2, p21, P53, cyclinB1, cdc2, and C-MYC . (A) TPA alone; (B) TPA and shRNA-control; and (C) TPA and shRNA-PER1Comet-FISH and apoptosis assayThe alkaline comet assay was performed following the standard protocol of McKelvey-Martin et al., (2012). U343glioma cells were harvested and washed twice with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and mixed with 0.7% low-melting point agarose. An agarose gel sandwich was prepared comprising a base layer of 0.5% standard agarose and a second layer of 0.7% low-melting point agarose with cells and overlaid with 0.7% low-melting point agarose to a depth of 0.5 mm. The assay was incubated at 4°C in a high humidity environment for 30 min. Gels were immersed in alkaline lysis solution (90% lysis buffer pH 10 and 10% DMSO) and maintained in the dark for 2 h at 4°C. Gels were briefly rinsed with PBS, equilibrated in 300 mM NaOH and 1 mM EDTA (pH 13) for 40 min, and then subjected to 100 mA at 25 mV for 30 min. Gels were stained with propidium iodide, and DNA comet tails were visualized with a fluorescence microscope at an excitation wavelength of 530 nm and emission wavelength of 620 nm. Apoptosis analysis was performed with the Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit I (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were analyzed using a flow cytometer (excitation 488 nm; emission 525 nm (GFP) and 620 nm (PI)) (BD Bioscience, USA).Real-time PCRGene expression was quantified using real-time PCR analysis and SYBR Green (Fermentas, USA). Total RNA was extracted from U343 cells with TRIzol and reverse-transcribed into cDNA using a RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Fermentas, USA). Samples were analyzed in triplicate using a CXF96 Real-time PCR System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Ca, USA). A total of 500 ng of sample cDNA was subjected to the following program: 2 min at 50°C (annealing), 10 sec at 95°C (melting), followed by 40 cycles of 15 sec at 95°C, 30 sec at 56°C and a 30 sec extension at 72°C.Western blottingU343glioma cells were harvested, and total protein was extracted at 24 h after X-ray irradiation. Isolated proteins (40–60 mg) were separated using SDS–PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Millipore, USA). Nonspecific binding sites were blocked with albumin, and membranes were probed with antibodies specific for ATM, CHK2, p21, P53, cyclinB1, cdc2, and C-MYC (Abcam, USA). Each assay was repeated at least three times. Images and relative expression levels of target genes were captured and quantified using Gel-Pro Analyzer (Media Cybernetics, USA).Statistical AnalysisData are presented as the mean ± SD, and Student’s t-test was used for comparisons among different groups. P-values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Expression of PER1 in U343glioma cellsQuantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and western blotting were applied to analyze PER1 expression at the RNA and protein levels, respectively. Both RNA and immunoreactive proteins were notably reduced in U343 cells transfected with shRNA-PER1 relative to shRNA-transfected control U343 cells (P<0.05; n=3) (Figure 1). The expression level of PER1 mRNA was consistently reduced by more than 70% in shRNA-PER1 cells (Figure 1A). Cells transfected with shRNA-PER1 also expressed reduced PER1 protein levels compared with the control cells (Figure 1B).
Figure 1
Expression of Per1 mRNA and Per1 Protein in U343 Human Glioma Cell Lines. Figure 1A, U343 cells expressing shRNA-control and shRNA-per1 were detected by real-time PCR. Figure 1B, Total cellular protein was isolated from U343 glioma cells, and 40–60 µg was separated electrophoretically, transferred to nitrocellulose and subjected to western blot analysis with antibodies directed against the per1 proteins. U343 cells were cultivated in vitro under standard conditions. (A) TPA alone; (B) TPA and shRNA-control; and (C) TPA and shRNA-PER1
Having demonstrated that lentiviral-mediated RNA interference technology was an effective inhibitor of PER1 expression, subsequent experiments utilized this technology to examine the role of PER1 in glioma cells subjected to low-dose X-ray irradiation.X-ray irradiation enhances PER1 expression in U343glioma cellsThis experiment was intended to study the role of PER1 in apoptosis induced by X-ray irradiation. Prior to the start of the experiment, we verified whether there was a relationship between PER1 and X-ray radiation. We measured the expression of PER1 before and after irradiation. PER1 expression increased, both at the mRNA level (qRT-PCR) and at the protein level (western blot) (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Effect of X-ray Irradiation on the Expression of Per1 in U343 Human Glioma Tumor Cells. Figure 2A, Relative mRNA levels of per1 in U343 cells transfected with shRNA-control or shRNA-per1 were measured by QRT-PCR. Figure 2B, Total cellular protein was isolated from U343 human glioma cells before and after exposure to X-ray irradiation. Then, 40–60 µg of total cellular protein was electrophoretically separated, transferred to nitrocellulose and subjected to western blot analysis using antibodies directed against PER1 protein. β-actin was used as a loading control. (A) TPA alone; (B) TPA and shRNA-control; and (C) TPA and shRNA-PER1
Downregulation of PER1 decreases apoptosis in X-ray-irradiated U343glioma cellsTo determine the possible effects of irradiation on the apoptosis of glioma cells, U343 cells were double-stained with Annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide and analyzed using flow cytometry. The proportion of apoptotic cells in the TPA+shRNA-per1 group (11.29%) after irradiation treatment was significantly lower than that in the TPA alone group (33.46%, P<0.01) and the TPA+ control group (41.71%, P<0.01). These data suggested that the downregulation of PER1 was associated with a significant decrease in apoptosis of the U343 cell population after exposure to X-ray ionizing radiation.Downregulation of PER1 attenuates radiosensitivity and DNA damage in U343glioma cellsAfter exposure to 10 Gy of X-ray radiation, U343 cells were selected with puromycin for 7 days prior to analysis for DNA damage. Single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE) revealed the presence of differential DNA damage. We noted that DNA tailing was less prominent in cells transfected with shRNA-PER1 compared to the group transfected with shRNA-control+TPA and the TPA alone group. The tail moment was 0.251 + 0.062 for the TPA alone group, 0.191 + 0.023 for the negative control siRNA group, and 0.093+0.001 for the targeted siRNA group (P<0.05) (Figure 4). These data indicated that the downregulation of PER1 decreased glioma cell sensitivity to ionizing radiation, resulting in decreased DNA damage.
Figure 4
Single-Cell Gel Electrophoresis (SCGE) Analysis of X-ray (10 Gy)-Induced DNA Damage in U343 Cells.DNA damage repair capacity assessed via the comet assay.(A) TPA alone; (B) TPA and shRNA-control; and (C) TPA and shRNA-PER1.This response was statistically significant (P<0.05; n=3)
Effects of siClock on cellular apoptosis-related GenesBecause our data suggested that PER1 positively influenced the programmed cell death of U343glioma cells, we subsequently examined the expression of the following genes known to be important in DNA damage repair and programmed cell death: ATM, CHK2, p21, P53, cyclinB1, cdc2, and C-MYC. As shown in Figure 4, shRNA treatment resulted in a clear reduction in the expression of the per1 protein compared to the control treatment. Moreover, the protein expression of p53, p21 and chk2 were downregulated, and the expression of cdc2 and Cyclin B1 were upregulated by shRNA-per1 treatment (Figure 5A and B). However, the protein expression levels of c-myc and ATM were not significantly altered by siPER1 treatment.
Figure 5
Effect of sh-RNA-per1 on ATM, TP53 and C-MYC mRNA and Protein Expression in U343 Human Glioma Tumor Cell Lines Following Irradiation. Figure 5A,Relative mRNA levels were determined by qRT-PCR. Data are expressed as ΔΔCT relative to the control.Figure 5B, Total U343 glioma cell extracts were examined by quantitative western blotting at 24 h after exposure to 10 Gy X-ray irradiation. Antibodies were specific for ATM, CHK2, p21, P53, cyclinB1, cdc2, and C-MYC . (A) TPA alone; (B) TPA and shRNA-control; and (C) TPA and shRNA-PER1
Discussion
In recent years, research on the core clock circadian gene PER1 has shown that this gene maintains the biological clock and a 24 h oscillation. Reduced levels of Per1 and the disruption of the 24 h circadian rhythm were found in liver cancer, breast cancer, colon cancer, lymphoma, and gliomapatients. We have investigated the role of PER1 in glioma cells. Evidence from initial research implicated PER1 as a regulator of the circadian clock(Han et al., 2016; Korge et al., 2018; Repouskou et al., 2016; Reinhardt et al., 2012; Riley et al., 2008); however, recent evidence has expanded the function of PER1 to include the promotion of apoptosis in cancer cells (Han et al., 2016; Korge et al., 2007). We hypothesized that PER1 is also a tumor suppressor gene.Experimental evidence from our previous studies indicated that the expression of PER1 and PER2 closely correlated with the incidence and development of glioma. Moreover, biological rhythms have also become an important prognostic indicator of the survival of gliomapatients. However, our previous data from C6 glioma cells studied in vitro also indicated their involvement in biological rhythms. Following the administration of radiation at different time points, cells expressing high levels of PER1 showed a death rate significantly higher than those of other cells. Similar results could be observed in other tumors. In nude mice subcutaneously injected with human tongue cancer cells, PER1 knockdown in the cells enhanced tumor development, leading to increased tumor weights and volumes. All of the above data suggest that PER1 plays an important role in promoting apoptosis in cancer cells. These findings are consistent with our data from humanglioma cancer specimens.Apoptosis was induced by X-ray after DNA damage. When DNA damage occurs, it continues to activate several checkpoints, such as ATM/ATR, CHK1/2, and so on. Then, P53, an important protein in the regulation of DNA damage and repair and the cell cycle, is activated (Korge et al., 2007; Orren et al., 1997 ), which results in the arrest of the cell cycle at the G1/S, S or G2/M phase to provide sufficient time for the repair of DNA damage (Weinert et al., 1997). If DNA damage is not properly repaired, chromosomal deletions, duplications or translocations can occur; thus, the P53 protein will instantly activate P21 (CDKN1A), BAX and other related genes to prevent gene mutation and carcinogenesis (Korge et al., 2007; Weinert et al., 1997). In addition, P53 is also connected to promoter binding of the oncogene C-MYC and inhibits its transcription by promoting deacetylase (Ho et al., 2005). Conversely, P53 in the cytoplasm can directly act on proapoptotic BCL family members to enhance the transduction of apoptotic signals (Ho et al., 2005).In this study, we focused on the role of PER1 in DNA damage, apoptosis and radiosensitivity of glioma cells induced by X-ray irradiation. After comprehensively surveying the links between PER1 and P53 in previous reports[2, 4, 9-14], we selected wild-type P53humanU343glioma cells. Then, RNA interference technology and shRNA lentivirus were used to downregulate PER1. However, we found that following treatment with X-ray irradiation, DNA damage was observed in the TPA+shRNA-control group, and the TPA alone group cells showed more serious DNA tailing phenomena and a significantly increased death rate compared with those in the TPA+shRNA-per1 group. Following exposure to X-ray irradiation, U343 cells with high PER1 expression levels had serious DNA damage and a higher death rate. We mainly focused on the mechanism by which PER1 regulates the apoptosis of U343 cells through the ATM–P53 pathway to initiate DNA damage repair. The important ATM checkpoint in DNA damage should be activated when exposed to X-ray irradiation and start the DNA repair mechanism mediated by P53 to ensure the maximum repair of damaged DNA. However, in our research, the expression of ATM was not significantly different in U343 cells with low PER1 expression levels compared to other cells when exposed to X-ray irradiation, causing a significantly different expression of P53. This shows that in addition to the effect of X-ray irradiation, ATM can also be affected by other factors, such as per1, which has an important direct impact.CHK2, which is involved in DNA repair, cell cycle arrest or apoptosis in response to DNA damage, was significantly lower in the TPA+shRNA-per1 group than in the TPA alone and TPA shRNA-control group. By keeping other disruption factors consistent, we found that the downregulation of the expression of PER1 can decrease the expression of activated CHK2 and P53. Therefore, we hypothesized that it is not only involved in the regulation of DNA damage but also regulates cell apoptosis via the CHK-P53 pathway as the upstream gene of chk2 and P53.The tumor suppressor p53 is a transcription factor that is activated in response to DNA damage or oncogenic transformation. The loss or mutation of p53 in many cancers leads to impaired cell cycle regulation, genomic instability, and the inhibition of apoptosis The protein levels of p53 in the per1-silenced cells tended to be lower than those in the control cells, indicating that per1 regulated p53 expression, and this activity may at least partially contribute to the apoptosis of per1-silenced cells. In the present study, the expression levels of cdc2 and cyclin B1 were upregulated by shRNA-per1 treatment. Our findings support previous studies that showed that p53 regulates Cdc2 and Cyclin B1 through transcriptional suppression. We also speculate that the per1 gene is involved in the regulation of cdc2 and cyclinB1 through the regulattion of P53.The circadian clock-controlled gene c-myc plays a key role in cell proliferation and apoptosis. The deregulation of c-myc has been associated with various cancers and with the hyperplastic growth of mammalian tissues. In our study, we focused on examining circadian clock-regulated gene expression to emphasize the fundamental role that the circadian clock plays in glioma cell apoptosis following irradiation. We found that the levels of c-myc were significantly decreased in irradiated shRNAper1-transfected glioma cells and that c-myc overexpression induced genomic DNA damage and compromised p53 function, presumably via a reactive oxygen species-mediated mechanism.These results indicated the important effect of PER1 on the apoptosis of U343 cells caused by irradiation. On the one hand, downregulation of PER1 can worsen the radiosensitivity of U343glioma cells, while the expression of important checkpoints in DNA damage, such as CHK2 and P53, are decreased by the regulation of PER1, which reduces the effect of the chk2–P53 pathway activated by DNA damage. Moreover, C-MYC is also controlled by the circadian clock (Kolomeichuk et al., 2011); together with the two proteins described above, C-MYC can induce apoptosis in U343 cells.In conclusions, it can be concluded from our present study that the downregulation of PER1 can decrease the sensitivity of U343glioma cells exposed to X-ray irradiation and reduce apoptosis. The mechanism by which it does this can be summarized as changes in the expression of PER1, which can activate the CHK2–P53 pathway and other genes associated with cell cycle arrest and apoptosis caused by X-rays, such as c-myc, P53, p21, cdc2 and cyclineB1, thus further inducing apoptosis. Therefore, we hypothesize that PER1, the core circadian gene, is not only a tumor suppressor gene but can also be regarded as an upstream regulatory gene of P53, which plays an important role in inhibiting tumor growth and promoting apoptosis of cancer cells by regulating P53 expression, DNA damage repair and apoptosis. These findings provide a new target for the clinical treatment of glioma and a reliable basis for postradiation therapy and gene therapy for glioma and other cancers.
Funding Statement
Supported by Hubei Provincial Nature Science Foundation grant: 2017CFC823.
Authors: Xiaoming Yang; Patricia A Wood; Christine M Ansell; Dinah Faith T Quiton; Eun-Yeong Oh; Jovelyn Du-Quiton; William J M Hrushesky Journal: Chronobiol Int Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 2.877
Authors: Dorela D Shuboni-Mulligan; Demarrius Young; Julianie De La Cruz Minyety; Nicole Briceno; Orieta Celiku; Amanda L King; Jeeva Munasinghe; Herui Wang; Kendra A Adegbesan; Mark R Gilbert; DeeDee K Smart; Terri S Armstrong Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 4.996