Literature DB >> 31350794

The diagnostic utility of targeted gene panel sequencing in discriminating etiologies of cytopenia.

Gang Zheng1,2, Ping Chen1,3, Aparna Pallavajjalla1, Lisa Haley1, Lukasz Gondek4, Amy Dezern4, Hua Ling5, Federico De Marchi1, Ming-Tseh Lin1, Christopher Gocke1,4.   

Abstract

The diagnostic utility of somatic mutations in the context of cytopenias is unclear: clonal hematopoiesis can be found in healthy individuals, patients with aplastic anemia (AA), clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). We examined a cohort of 207 well-characterized cytopenic patients with a 640-gene next generation sequencing (NGS) panel and compared its diagnostic utility with a "virtual" 41 gene panel. The TET2, SF3B1, ASXL1, and TP53 were the most commonly mutated genes (frequency > 10%). Mutations in the 640-gene panel show high sensitivity (98.3%) but low specificity (47.6%) for diagnosis of MDS. Notably, mutations of splicing factors and genes in the RAS pathway are relatively specific to MDS. Furthermore, high variant allele frequency (VAF) predicts MDS: when the VAF is set at 20%, the positive predictive value (PPV) for MDS is 95.9%, with a specificity of 95.3%. The presence of two or more somatic mutations with ≥10% VAF showed a PPV of 95.2%. While the "virtual" 41-gene panel showed a mild decrease in sensitivity (95.7% vs 98.3%), 100% specificity was observed when either VAF was set at ≥20% (100% vs 95.3%), or two or more somatic mutations had VAFs ≥ 10%. Our study shows targeted gene panel sequencing improves the diagnostic approach and accuracy for unexplained cytopenia, with its high sensitivity and high PPV for MDS when applying VAF cutoffs. Furthermore, a 41-gene panel was shown to have at least comparable performance characteristics to the large 640-gene panel.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31350794      PMCID: PMC9162094          DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   13.265


  29 in total

1.  Identification of novel cytogenetic markers with prognostic significance in a series of 968 patients with primary myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Francesc Solé; Elisa Luño; Carmen Sanzo; Blanca Espinet; Guillermo F Sanz; José Cervera; María José Calasanz; Juan Cruz Cigudosa; Fuensanta Millà; Josep Maria Ribera; Encarna Bureo; Maria Luisa Marquez; Eva Arranz; Lourdes Florensa
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  MDS-associated somatic mutations and clonal hematopoiesis are common in idiopathic cytopenias of undetermined significance.

Authors:  Brian Kwok; Jeff M Hall; John S Witte; Yin Xu; Prashanti Reddy; Keming Lin; Rachel Flamholz; Bashar Dabbas; Aine Yung; Jenan Al-Hafidh; Emily Balmert; Christine Vaupel; Carlos El Hader; Matthew J McGinniss; Shareef A Nahas; Julie Kines; Rafael Bejar
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Emerging strategies for high-risk and relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia: novel agents and approaches currently in clinical trials.

Authors:  Joshua P Sasine; Gary J Schiller
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 8.250

4.  Clonal hematopoiesis and blood-cancer risk inferred from blood DNA sequence.

Authors:  Giulio Genovese; Anna K Kähler; Robert E Handsaker; Johan Lindberg; Samuel A Rose; Samuel F Bakhoum; Kimberly Chambert; Eran Mick; Benjamin M Neale; Menachem Fromer; Shaun M Purcell; Oscar Svantesson; Mikael Landén; Martin Höglund; Sören Lehmann; Stacey B Gabriel; Jennifer L Moran; Eric S Lander; Patrick F Sullivan; Pamela Sklar; Henrik Grönberg; Christina M Hultman; Steven A McCarroll
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  A prognostic score for patients with lower risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  G Garcia-Manero; J Shan; S Faderl; J Cortes; F Ravandi; G Borthakur; W G Wierda; S Pierce; E Estey; J Liu; X Huang; H Kantarjian
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  Prevalence of anemia in persons 65 years and older in the United States: evidence for a high rate of unexplained anemia.

Authors:  Jack M Guralnik; Richard S Eisenstaedt; Luigi Ferrucci; Harvey G Klein; Richard C Woodman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  BRAF inhibition in hairy cell leukemia with low-dose vemurafenib.

Authors:  Sascha Dietrich; Andreas Pircher; Volker Endris; Frédéric Peyrade; Clemens-Martin Wendtner; George A Follows; Jennifer Hüllein; Alexander Jethwa; Elena Ellert; Tatjana Walther; Xiyang Liu; Martin J S Dyer; Thomas Elter; Tilman Brummer; Robert Zeiser; Michael Hermann; Michael Herold; Wilko Weichert; Claire Dearden; Torsten Haferlach; Martina Seiffert; Michael Hallek; Christof von Kalle; Anthony D Ho; Anita Gaehler; Mindaugas Andrulis; Michael Steurer; Thorsten Zenz
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Validation of a prognostic model and the impact of mutations in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Rafael Bejar; Kristen E Stevenson; Bennett A Caughey; Omar Abdel-Wahab; David P Steensma; Naomi Galili; Azra Raza; Hagop Kantarjian; Ross L Levine; Donna Neuberg; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Benjamin L Ebert
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Inter-observer variance with the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) following the 2008 WHO classification.

Authors:  P Font; J Loscertales; C Benavente; A Bermejo; M Callejas; L Garcia-Alonso; A Garcia-Marcilla; S Gil; M Lopez-Rubio; E Martin; C Muñoz; P Ricard; C Soto; P Balsalobre; A Villegas
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 10.  IDH mutations in cancer and progress toward development of targeted therapeutics.

Authors:  L Dang; K Yen; E C Attar
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 51.769

View more
  10 in total

1.  Cancer spectrum and outcomes in the Mendelian short telomere syndromes.

Authors:  Kristen E Schratz; Lisa Haley; Sonye K Danoff; Amanda L Blackford; Amy E DeZern; Christopher D Gocke; Amy S Duffield; Mary Armanios
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  When are idiopathic and clonal cytopenias of unknown significance (ICUS or CCUS)?

Authors:  Afaf E W G Osman
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2021-12-10

3.  CREBBP and STAT6 co-mutation and 16p13 and 1p36 loss define the t(14;18)-negative diffuse variant of follicular lymphoma.

Authors:  Rena R Xian; Yi Xie; Lisa M Haley; Raluca Yonescu; Aparna Pallavajjala; Stefania Pittaluga; Elaine S Jaffe; Amy S Duffield; Chad M McCall; Shereen M F Gheith; Christopher D Gocke
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 11.037

Review 4.  NPM1-Mutated Myeloid Neoplasms with <20% Blasts: A Really Distinct Clinico-Pathologic Entity?

Authors:  Fabio Forghieri; Vincenzo Nasillo; Ambra Paolini; Francesca Bettelli; Valeria Pioli; Davide Giusti; Andrea Gilioli; Corrado Colasante; Gloria Acquaviva; Giovanni Riva; Patrizia Barozzi; Rossana Maffei; Leonardo Potenza; Roberto Marasca; Claudio Fozza; Enrico Tagliafico; Tommaso Trenti; Patrizia Comoli; Giuseppe Longo; Mario Luppi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Molecular markers demonstrate diagnostic and prognostic value in the evaluation of myelodysplastic syndromes in cytopenia patients.

Authors:  Jonathan Chiou; Allison Chiou; Rong He; Dong Chen; Constance P Chen; Caroline Spethman; Kurt R Bessonen; Jennifer L Oliveira; Phuong L Nguyen; Kaaren K Reichard; James D Hoyer; Simon D Althoff; Dana J Roh; Mechelle A Miller; Ji Yuan; Horatiu Olteanu; Kebede Begna; Ayalew Tefferi; Hassan Alkhateeb; Mrinal M Patnaik; Mark R Litzow; Aref Al-Kali; David S Viswanatha
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 11.037

6.  Case Report: Opposite Effects of BRAF Inhibition on Closely Related Clonal Myeloid Disorders.

Authors:  Katrin E Hostettler; Elisa Casañas Quintana; Michael Tamm; Spasenija Savic Prince; Gregor Sommer; Wei-Chih Chen; Thierry Michael Nordmann; Pontus Lundberg; Gregor Thomas Stehle; Thomas Daikeler
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Somatic reversion impacts myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia evolution in the short telomere disorders.

Authors:  Kristen E Schratz; Valeriya Gaysinskaya; Zoe L Cosner; Emily A DeBoy; Zhimin Xiang; Laura Kasch-Semenza; Liliana Florea; Pali D Shah; Mary Armanios
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  [Progress in pre-myelodysplastic syndrome conditions].

Authors:  W Zhang; R Fu
Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-07-14

Review 9.  The Potential Equivalents of TET2 Mutations.

Authors:  Sergiu Pasca; Ancuta Jurj; Mihnea Zdrenghea; Ciprian Tomuleasa
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Germline ERBB2/HER2 Coding Variants Are Associated with Increased Risk of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

Authors:  Evan M Braunstein; Hang Chen; Felicia Juarez; Fanghan Yang; Lindsay Tao; Igor Makhlin; Donna M Williams; Shruti Chaturvedi; Aparna Pallavajjala; Theodoros Karantanos; Renan Martin; Elizabeth Wohler; Nara Sobreira; Christopher D Gocke; Alison R Moliterno
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 6.639

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.