Literature DB >> 31350784

When Expectancies Are Violated: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Luana Colloca1, Lieven A Schenk1, Dominic E Nathan2, Oliver J Robinson3, Christian Grillon4.   

Abstract

Positive and negative expectancies drive behavioral and neurobiological placebo and nocebo effects, which in turn can have profound effects on patient improvement or worsening. However, expectations of events and outcomes are often not met in daily life and clinical practice. It is currently unknown how this affects placebo and nocebo effects. We have demonstrated that the violation of expectancies, such as when there is a discrepancy between what is expected and what is actually presented, reduces both placebo and nocebo effects while causing an extinction of placebo effects. The reduction of placebo and nocebo effects was paralleled by an activation of the left inferior parietal cortex, a brain region that redirects attention when discrepancies between sensory and cognitive events occur. Our findings highlight the importance of expectancy violation in shaping placebo and nocebo effects and open up new avenues for managing positive and negative expectations in clinical trials and practices.
© 2019 The Authors Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2019 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31350784      PMCID: PMC6851406          DOI: 10.1002/cpt.1587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.903


  29 in total

Review 1.  The problem of the placebo response in clinical trials for psychiatric disorders: culprits, possible remedies, and a novel study design approach.

Authors:  Maurizio Fava; A Eden Evins; David J Dorer; David A Schoenfeld
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 17.659

2.  The Placebo Effect in Pain Therapies.

Authors:  Luana Colloca
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 13.820

3.  Factors contributing to large analgesic effects in placebo mechanism studies conducted between 2002 and 2007.

Authors:  Lene Vase; Gitte Laue Petersen; Joseph L Riley; Donald D Price
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Violation of expectation: neural correlates reflect bases of prediction.

Authors:  Andreja Bubic; D Yves von Cramon; Thomas Jacobsen; Erich Schröger; Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test.

Authors:  M F Scheier; C S Carver; M W Bridges
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1994-12

6.  Brain mechanisms supporting discrimination of sensory features of pain: a new model.

Authors:  Yoshitetsu Oshiro; Alexandre S Quevedo; John G McHaffie; Robert A Kraft; Robert C Coghill
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Method for quantitative estimation of thermal thresholds in patients.

Authors:  H Fruhstorfer; U Lindblom; W C Schmidt
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  The Placebo Phenomenon: A Narrow Focus on Psychological Models.

Authors:  Nathalie Peiris; Maxie Blasini; Thelma Wright; Luana Colloca
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.416

9.  A meta-analysis of brain mechanisms of placebo analgesia: consistent findings and unanswered questions.

Authors:  Lauren Y Atlas; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2014

10.  The effect of treatment expectation on drug efficacy: imaging the analgesic benefit of the opioid remifentanil.

Authors:  Ulrike Bingel; Vishvarani Wanigasekera; Katja Wiech; Roisin Ni Mhuircheartaigh; Michael C Lee; Markus Ploner; Irene Tracey
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 17.956

View more
  6 in total

1.  Pain Control and Anxiolysis After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Using Immersive Virtual Reality: A Case Report.

Authors:  Adam Kardon; Robert S Murray; Mazhar Khalid; Luana Colloca; J Marc Simard; Neeraj Badjatia; Sarah B Murthi; Nicholas A Morris
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2022-05-12

Review 2.  Engaging endogenous opioid circuits in pain affective processes.

Authors:  Blake A Kimmey; Nora M McCall; Lisa M Wooldridge; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Gregory Corder
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  Brain responses to painful electrical stimuli and cognitive tasks interact in the precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex, and inferior parietal cortex and do not vary across the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Dieuwke S Veldhuijzen; Timothy J Meeker; Deborah Bauer; Michael L Keaser; Rao P Gullapalli; Joel D Greenspan
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  A virtual experimenter does not increase placebo hypoalgesia when delivering an interactive expectancy manipulation.

Authors:  Bjoern Horing; Sarah C Beadle; Zachariah Inks; Andrew Robb; Eric R Muth; Sabarish V Babu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Less is more: Removing a modality of an expected olfactory-visual stimulation enhances brain activation.

Authors:  Doris Schicker; Sonja Blankenagel; Claus Zimmer; Hans Hauner; Jessica Freiherr
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 5.399

6.  Expectations: How and when do they contribute to placebo analgesia?

Authors:  Sophie Rosenkjær; Sigrid Juhl Lunde; Irving Kirsch; Lene Vase
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 5.435

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.