Literature DB >> 31350545

Sex-Based Disparities Among Cancer Clinical Trial Participants.

Ethan B Ludmir1, C David Fuller1, Shalini Moningi1, Walker Mainwaring2, Timothy A Lin1,2, Austin B Miller3, Amit Jethanandani1,4, Andres F Espinoza2, Vivek Verma5, Benjamin D Smith1, Grace L Smith1, Noam A VanderWalde6, Emma B Holliday1, B Ashleigh Guadagnolo1, Thomas E Stinchcombe7, Reshma Jagsi8, Daniel R Gomez1,9, Bruce D Minsky1, Claus Rödel10,11,12,13, Emmanouil Fokas10,11,12,13.   

Abstract

Landmark investigation two decades ago demonstrated sex-based disparities among participants in cancer cooperative group trials. Although federal efforts have aimed to improve representation of female patients in government-sponsored research, less is known about sex disparities in the broader landscape of modern oncologic randomized controlled trials. Using ClinicalTrials.gov, we identified randomized controlled trials related to colorectal or lung cancer (the two most common non-sex-specific disease sites). Among the 147 included trials, the proportion of female patients enrolled on trial was on average 6.8% (95% confidence interval = -8.8% to -4.9%) less than the proportion of female patients in the population by disease site (P < .001). Whereas no statistically significant underrepresentation of women was noted within the 26 cooperative group trials, sex disparities were markedly heightened for the 121 noncooperative-group-sponsored trials. Furthermore, underrepresentation of women did not improve with time. Future efforts should therefore focus on addressing these pervasive sex-based enrollment disparities beyond cooperative group trials alone.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31350545      PMCID: PMC7019091          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djz154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  8 in total

1.  The calculus of national medical research policy--the United States versus Asia.

Authors:  Gordon H Sun; Jeffrey D Steinberg; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Factors Associated With Age Disparities Among Cancer Clinical Trial Participants.

Authors:  Ethan B Ludmir; Walker Mainwaring; Timothy A Lin; Austin B Miller; Amit Jethanandani; Andres F Espinoza; Jacob J Mandel; Steven H Lin; Benjamin D Smith; Grace L Smith; Noam A VanderWalde; Bruce D Minsky; Albert C Koong; Thomas E Stinchcombe; Reshma Jagsi; Daniel R Gomez; Charles R Thomas; C David Fuller
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 31.777

3.  Underrepresentation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer-treatment trials.

Authors:  L F Hutchins; J M Unger; J J Crowley; C A Coltman; K S Albain
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Enrollment Trends and Disparity Among Patients With Lung Cancer in National Clinical Trials, 1990 to 2012.

Authors:  Herbert H Pang; Xiaofei Wang; Thomas E Stinchcombe; Melisa L Wong; Perry Cheng; Apar Kishor Ganti; Daniel J Sargent; Ying Zhang; Chen Hu; Sumithra J Mandrekar; Mary W Redman; Judith B Manola; Richard L Schilsky; Harvey J Cohen; Jeffrey D Bradley; Alex A Adjei; David Gandara; Suresh S Ramalingam; Everett E Vokes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Evolution of the randomized controlled trial in oncology over three decades.

Authors:  Christopher M Booth; David W Cescon; Lisa Wang; Ian F Tannock; Monika K Krzyzanowska
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Enrollment of patients with lung and colorectal cancers onto clinical trials.

Authors:  Mona N Fouad; Jeannette Y Lee; Paul J Catalano; Thomas M Vogt; Syed Yousuf Zafar; Dee W West; Christian Simon; Carrie N Klabunde; Katherine L Kahn; Jane C Weeks; Catarina I Kiefe
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities.

Authors:  Vivek H Murthy; Harlan M Krumholz; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Under-representation of women in high-impact published clinical cancer research.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Amy R Motomura; Sudha Amarnath; Aleksandra Jankovic; Nathan Sheets; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Disparities in patient enrollment on glioblastoma clinical trials.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Andrea Wasilewski; Nimish A Mohile
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2020-06-30

2.  Sex Representation in Clinical Trials Associated with FDA Cancer Drug Approvals Differs Between Solid and Hematologic Malignancies.

Authors:  Shehara Mendis; Seerat Anand; Joanna M Karasinska; Arvind Dasari; Joseph M Unger; Anirudh Gothwal; Lee M Ellis; Gauri Varadhachary; Scott Kopetz; Michael J Overman; Kanwal Raghav; Jonathan M Loree
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 5.837

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.