Literature DB >> 32960478

Sex Representation in Clinical Trials Associated with FDA Cancer Drug Approvals Differs Between Solid and Hematologic Malignancies.

Shehara Mendis1, Seerat Anand2, Joanna M Karasinska3, Arvind Dasari2, Joseph M Unger4, Anirudh Gothwal5, Lee M Ellis2, Gauri Varadhachary2, Scott Kopetz2, Michael J Overman2, Kanwal Raghav2, Jonathan M Loree1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proportionate female representation in health research is necessary for scientific rigor and health equity. We aimed to assess the representation of women in clinical trials leading to U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cancer drug approvals.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Trials supporting FDA cancer drug approvals between July 2008 and June 2018 were sourced from PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov. The ratio of female to male trial enrollment was compared with cancer incidence and mortality in the U.S. using International Agency for Research on Cancer data. Reproductive tract and breast cancers were excluded. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing trial enrollment with population incidence and mortality were calculated.
RESULTS: A total of 186 trials leading to 170 FDA cancer drug approvals showed slight female underrepresentation compared with overall cancer incidence in the U.S. (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.98, p < .0001). Female enrollment for drugs approved between 2008-2013 and 2014-2018 was unchanged (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.99-1.05, p = .25). There was slight female underrepresentation in hematological trials (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91-0.998; p = .040 for leukemia; OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-0.997; p = .040 for lymphoma) and significant female underrepresentation in colorectal (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.69-0.76; p < .0001), pancreas (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93; p = .0004), lung (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.75-0.80; p < .0001), kidney (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.60-0.67; p < .0001), and thyroid cancer trials (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.23-0.28; p < .0001) compared with U.S. incidence.
CONCLUSION: Female underrepresentation has persisted within solid organ tumor trials but is less notable in hematologic trials. Additional work is required to identify drivers of such disparity. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Adequate gender representation in clinical trials is a matter of health equity. This study demonstrates that women remain underrepresented in trials across hematological and solid organ trials compared with cancer incidence and mortality in women, with the disparity worse in a number of solid organ tumor types. There are thus still significant improvements to be made regarding adequate representation of women in trials. Studies exploring the reasons for ongoing disparity in gender representation are warranted to help clinicians to rectify this. © AlphaMed Press 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trial; Healthcare disparities; Neoplasms; Sex

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32960478      PMCID: PMC7873318          DOI: 10.1002/onco.13534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159            Impact factor:   5.837


  41 in total

1.  Investigational new drug applications and new drug applications--FDA. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1998-02-11

2.  Sex Differences in Efficacy and Toxicity of Systemic Treatments: An Undervalued Issue in the Era of Precision Oncology.

Authors:  Berna C Özdemir; Chantal Csajka; Gian-Paolo Dotto; Anna Dorothea Wagner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  B7-H1-dependent sex-related differences in tumor immunity and immunotherapy responses.

Authors:  Pei-Yi Lin; Lishi Sun; Suzanne R Thibodeaux; Sara M Ludwig; Ratna K Vadlamudi; Vincent J Hurez; Rumana Bahar; Mark J Kious; Carolina B Livi; Shawna R Wall; Lieping Chen; Bin Zhang; Tahiro Shin; Tyler J Curiel
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  Gut microbiome modulates response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients.

Authors:  V Gopalakrishnan; C N Spencer; L Nezi; A Reuben; M C Andrews; T V Karpinets; P A Prieto; D Vicente; K Hoffman; S C Wei; A P Cogdill; L Zhao; C W Hudgens; D S Hutchinson; T Manzo; M Petaccia de Macedo; T Cotechini; T Kumar; W S Chen; S M Reddy; R Szczepaniak Sloane; J Galloway-Pena; H Jiang; P L Chen; E J Shpall; K Rezvani; A M Alousi; R F Chemaly; S Shelburne; L M Vence; P C Okhuysen; V B Jensen; A G Swennes; F McAllister; E Marcelo Riquelme Sanchez; Y Zhang; E Le Chatelier; L Zitvogel; N Pons; J L Austin-Breneman; L E Haydu; E M Burton; J M Gardner; E Sirmans; J Hu; A J Lazar; T Tsujikawa; A Diab; H Tawbi; I C Glitza; W J Hwu; S P Patel; S E Woodman; R N Amaria; M A Davies; J E Gershenwald; P Hwu; J E Lee; J Zhang; L M Coussens; Z A Cooper; P A Futreal; C R Daniel; N J Ajami; J F Petrosino; M T Tetzlaff; P Sharma; J P Allison; R R Jenq; J A Wargo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Cancer statistics, 2015.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Gender differences in stage distribution of bladder cancer.

Authors:  N A Mungan; L A Kiemeney; J A van Dijck; H G van der Poel; J A Witjes
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Global cancer statistics, 2012.

Authors:  Lindsey A Torre; Freddie Bray; Rebecca L Siegel; Jacques Ferlay; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Cancer immunotherapy efficacy and patients' sex: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fabio Conforti; Laura Pala; Vincenzo Bagnardi; Tommaso De Pas; Marco Martinetti; Giuseppe Viale; Richard D Gelber; Aron Goldhirsch
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Disparity of Race Reporting and Representation in Clinical Trials Leading to Cancer Drug Approvals From 2008 to 2018.

Authors:  Jonathan M Loree; Seerat Anand; Arvind Dasari; Joseph M Unger; Anirudh Gothwal; Lee M Ellis; Gauri Varadhachary; Scott Kopetz; Michael J Overman; Kanwal Raghav
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 31.777

10.  Rising Thyroid Cancer Incidence in Southern India: An Epidemic of Overdiagnosis?

Authors:  Indu Elizabeth Mathew; Aju Mathew
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2017-04-04
View more
  4 in total

1.  Exposure-toxicity relationship of cabozantinib in patients with renal cell cancer and salivary gland cancer.

Authors:  Stefanie D Krens; Wim van Boxtel; Maike J M Uijen; Frank G A Jansman; Ingrid M E Desar; Sasja F Mulder; Carla M L van Herpen; Nielka P van Erp
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 7.316

Review 2.  Pitfalls and Successes in Trials in Older Transplant Patients with Hematologic Malignancies.

Authors:  Aaron T Zhao; Anthony D Sung
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Kidney function and cancer risk: An analysis using creatinine and cystatin C in a cohort study.

Authors:  Jennifer S Lees; Frederick Ho; Solange Parra-Soto; Carlos Celis-Morales; Paul Welsh; Michael K Sullivan; Bhautesh D Jani; Naveed Sattar; Ninian N Lang; Jill P Pell; Angela C Webster; Patrick B Mark
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-07-26

4.  Racial and ethnic enrollment disparities and demographic reporting requirements in acute leukemia clinical trials.

Authors:  Andrew Hantel; Marlise R Luskin; Jacqueline S Garcia; Wendy Stock; Daniel J DeAngelo; Gregory A Abel
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-11-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.