Q Lina Hu1, Jason B Liu2, Ryan J Ellis3, Jessica Y Liu4, Anthony D Yang5, Michael I D'Angelica6, Clifford Y Ko1, Ryan P Merkow7. 1. Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 2. Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 3. Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL, USA; Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center, Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. 4. Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. 5. Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center, Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. 6. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 7. Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL, USA; Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center, Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. Electronic address: Ryan.Merkow@northwestern.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS) and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) are two techniques used for preoperative biliary drainage prior to hepatobiliary resection. The objectives of this study were to determine predictors of the drainage technique selection and to evaluate the association between drainage technique and postoperative outcomes. METHODS: Using ACS NSQIP data (2014-2017), patients who underwent preoperative biliary drainage prior to hepatobiliary resection for malignancy were identified. Separate multivariable-adjusted, propensity score (PS) adjusted, and PS matched logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate the association between drainage technique and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Of 527 patients identified, 431 (81.8%) received EBS and 96 (18.2%) received PTBD. Patients who underwent PTBD had more preoperative co-morbidities, including higher ASA class, recent weight loss, and hypoalbuminemia (all p < 0.05). After multivariable adjustment, PTBD was significantly associated with 30-day DSM (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.24-2.97, p = 0.004), overall SSI (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.10-2.76, p = 0.019), and superficial SSI (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.20-3.60, p = 0.010). These findings remained significant for both PS-adjusted and PS-matched models. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing hepatobiliary resection selected for PTBD had significantly more preoperative co-morbidities and nutritional deficits. Compared to EBS, PTBD was associated with significantly higher odds of postoperative morbidity and mortality.
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS) and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) are two techniques used for preoperative biliary drainage prior to hepatobiliary resection. The objectives of this study were to determine predictors of the drainage technique selection and to evaluate the association between drainage technique and postoperative outcomes. METHODS: Using ACS NSQIP data (2014-2017), patients who underwent preoperative biliary drainage prior to hepatobiliary resection for malignancy were identified. Separate multivariable-adjusted, propensity score (PS) adjusted, and PS matched logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate the association between drainage technique and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Of 527 patients identified, 431 (81.8%) received EBS and 96 (18.2%) received PTBD. Patients who underwent PTBD had more preoperative co-morbidities, including higher ASA class, recent weight loss, and hypoalbuminemia (all p < 0.05). After multivariable adjustment, PTBD was significantly associated with 30-day DSM (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.24-2.97, p = 0.004), overall SSI (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.10-2.76, p = 0.019), and superficial SSI (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.20-3.60, p = 0.010). These findings remained significant for both PS-adjusted and PS-matched models. CONCLUSION:Patients undergoing hepatobiliary resection selected for PTBD had significantly more preoperative co-morbidities and nutritional deficits. Compared to EBS, PTBD was associated with significantly higher odds of postoperative morbidity and mortality.
Authors: Ahmer Hameed; Tony Pang; Judy Chiou; Henry Pleass; Vincent Lam; Michael Hollands; Emma Johnston; Arthur Richardson; Lawrence Yuen Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2016-04-04 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Robert J S Coelen; Eva Roos; Jimme K Wiggers; Marc G Besselink; Carlijn I Buis; Olivier R C Busch; Cornelis H C Dejong; Otto M van Delden; Casper H J van Eijck; Paul Fockens; Dirk J Gouma; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Michiel W de Haan; Jeanin E van Hooft; Jan N M IJzermans; G Matthijs Kater; Jan J Koornstra; Krijn P van Lienden; Adriaan Moelker; Steven W M Olde Damink; Jan-Werner Poley; Robert J Porte; Rogier J de Ridder; Joanne Verheij; Victor van Woerden; Erik A J Rauws; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Thomas M van Gulik Journal: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2018-08-17
Authors: Timothy J Kennedy; Adam Yopp; Yilin Qin; Binsheng Zhao; Pingzhen Guo; Fan Liu; Larry H Schwartz; Peter Allen; Michael D'Angelica; Yuman Fong; Ronald P DeMatteo; Leslie H Blumgart; William R Jarnagin Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Kwang Min Kim; Ji Won Park; Jong Kyun Lee; Kwang Hyuck Lee; Kyu Taek Lee; Sang Goon Shim Journal: Gut Liver Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 4.519