BACKGROUND: The high incidence of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) tract recurrence after resection of perihilar bile duct cancer (BDC) at a reference single center has suggested the need for endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) to prevent PTBD-related tumor recurrence. To determine the general applicability of these findings, we validated the risk of PTBD tract recurrence in patients with resected BDC in our high-volume center. METHODS: The medical records of 306 patients with perihilar BDC who underwent hepatobiliary resection with curative intent over 10 years were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Of the 306 patients, 293 (95.8%) underwent biliary decompression, 171 (56.1%) by preoperative PTBD, 62 (20.3%) by EBD alone, and 60 (19.7%) by both. Of the 231 patients who underwent PTBD, 160 (69.3%), 62 (26.8%), and 9 (3.9%) had one, two, or three catheters, respectively (mean of 1.3 catheters per patient for a median 23 days). No patient experienced synchronous PTBD tract metastasis, whereas 4 (1.7%) experienced PTBD tract recurrence a median 13.5 months after surgery, with 3 of these patients having an intraabdominal recurrence soon afterward. Only one patient had a solitary tract recurrence without intraabdominal metastasis. These patients survived for a median 25 months, which is comparable to survival outcomes after noncurative resection. No risk factor was significantly associated with PTBD tract recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: We think that the risk of PTBD tract recurrence after resection of perihilar BDC is not negligible but is much lower than previously reported. There is no definitive reason to avoid PTBD when it is indicated.
BACKGROUND: The high incidence of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) tract recurrence after resection of perihilar bile duct cancer (BDC) at a reference single center has suggested the need for endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) to prevent PTBD-related tumor recurrence. To determine the general applicability of these findings, we validated the risk of PTBD tract recurrence in patients with resected BDC in our high-volume center. METHODS: The medical records of 306 patients with perihilar BDC who underwent hepatobiliary resection with curative intent over 10 years were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Of the 306 patients, 293 (95.8%) underwent biliary decompression, 171 (56.1%) by preoperative PTBD, 62 (20.3%) by EBD alone, and 60 (19.7%) by both. Of the 231 patients who underwent PTBD, 160 (69.3%), 62 (26.8%), and 9 (3.9%) had one, two, or three catheters, respectively (mean of 1.3 catheters per patient for a median 23 days). No patient experienced synchronous PTBD tract metastasis, whereas 4 (1.7%) experienced PTBD tract recurrence a median 13.5 months after surgery, with 3 of these patients having an intraabdominal recurrence soon afterward. Only one patient had a solitary tract recurrence without intraabdominal metastasis. These patients survived for a median 25 months, which is comparable to survival outcomes after noncurative resection. No risk factor was significantly associated with PTBD tract recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: We think that the risk of PTBD tract recurrence after resection of perihilar BDC is not negligible but is much lower than previously reported. There is no definitive reason to avoid PTBD when it is indicated.
Authors: R Tersigni; P Rossi; O Bochicchio; M Cavallini; C Ambrogi; G Bufalini; L Alessandroni; L Arena; O Armeni; F Miraglia Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 1986-11 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Sung Gyu Lee; Gi Won Song; Shin Hwang; Tae Yong Ha; Deok Bog Moon; Dong Hwan Jung; Ki Hun Kim; Chul Soo Ahn; Myung Hwan Kim; Sung Koo Lee; Kyu Bo Sung; Gi Young Ko Journal: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci Date: 2009-10-23 Impact factor: 7.027
Authors: Jimme K Wiggers; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Robert J Coelen; Erik A Rauws; Mark A Schattner; C Yung Nio; Karen T Brown; Mithat Gonen; Susan van Dieren; Krijn P van Lienden; Peter J Allen; Marc G H Besselink; Olivier R C Busch; Michael I D'Angelica; Robert P DeMatteo; Dirk J Gouma; T Peter Kingham; William R Jarnagin; Thomas M van Gulik Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 10.093