| Literature DB >> 31349642 |
Kamila Salasinska1, Mateusz Barczewski2, Monika Borucka3, Rafał L Górny3, Paweł Kozikowski3, Maciej Celiński3, Agnieszka Gajek3.
Abstract
The influence of plant fillers on the flammability and smoke emission of naturalEntities:
Keywords: fire and smoke behaviour; plant waste fillers; polymer-matrix composites; smoke toxicity; thermal stability
Year: 2019 PMID: 31349642 PMCID: PMC6723686 DOI: 10.3390/polym11081234
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1The scheme of steady state tube furnace (Purser furnace), adapted from [18].
Figure 2Particle size distribution by weight of ground ground walnut (WS), hazelnut shell (HS), and sunflower husk (SH).
Figure 3SEM images of ground WS (a,b), HS (c,d), and SH (e,f).
Figure 4SEM images of unmodified epoxy resin (a) and composites with 10, 25, and 35 wt % of ground: WS (b,c,d), HS (e,f,g), and SH (h,i,j).
Figure 5Storage modulus (G’) (a–c) and damping factor (tanδ) (d–f) as a function of temperature of pure cast epoxy sample and epoxy-based composites.
Figure 6The values of composites storage modulus at various temperatures (a–c) and glass transition temperature (d).
Values determined based on thermogravimetric (TG) analysis conducted for WS, HS, and SH in nitrogen as well as air (organic components).
| Filler | Water, % | T150+1%, °C | DTG 1, °C | DTG 2, °C | Residual Mass at 900 °C, % | Organic Components, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WS | 3.1 | 216 | 291 | 345 | 17.9 | 94.1 |
| HS | 3.8 | 215 | 290 | 347 | 17.8 | 94.0 |
| SH | 3.8 | 194 | - | 333 | 19.7 | 91.1 |
TG and DTG data of epoxy resin (EP) and composites investigated in an inert atmosphere.
| Sample Designation | 5% Mass Loss, °C | 10% Mass Loss, °C | 50% Mass Loss, °C | DTGA, °C, %/min | Residual Mass 900 °C, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP | 172 | 224 | 364 | 368, −12.9 | 4.74 |
| 15% WS | 183 | 247 | 360 | 358, −11.0 | 9.43 |
| 25% WS | 175 | 240 | 357 | 358, −10.8 | 10.96 |
| 35% WS | 190 | 261 | 355 | 354, −10.0 | 13.98 |
| 15% HS | 178 | 240 | 361 | 365, −11.8 | 9.15 |
| 25% HS | 181 | 245 | 360 | 361, −11.1 | 12.66 |
| 35% HS | 190 | 255 | 357 | 354, −9.1 | 14.96 |
| 15% SH | 167 | 223 | 363 | 363, −11.1 | 8.50 |
| 25% SH | 154 | 209 | 364 | 365, −10.8 | 9.90 |
| 35% SH | 158 | 215 | 362 | 362, −8.9 | 11.31 |
Figure 7TG and DTG curves of epoxy resin, epoxy composites and natural filler investigated in an inert atmosphere.
Figure 8Effects of plant waste filler on the heat release behaviour of epoxy resin composites: (a) 15–35% WS; (b) 15–35% HS; (c) 15–35% SH; (d) 35% WS, HS and SH.
Cone calorimeter results of epoxy composites modified with shell and husk (standard deviation).
| Sample Designation | TTI, | pHRR, | THR, | MARHE, | Fire Residue, | SEA, | TSR, |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s | kW/m2 | MJ/m2 | kW/m2 | % | m2/kg | m2/m2 | |
| EP | 51(17) | 1156 (221) | 184 (7) | 569 (82) | 8 (1) | 1582 (554) | 10,353 (3672) |
| 15% WS | 47 (6) | 803 (81) | 167 (1) | 536 (43) | 10 (1) | 834 (43) | 5303 (284) |
| 25% WS | 55 (2) | 826 (14) | 167 (7) | 531 (12) | 11 (2) | 743 (22) | 4731 (239) |
| 35% WS | 46 (3) | 873 (87) | 155 (2) | 543 (26) | 14 (0) | 650 (35) | 3986 (199) |
| 15% HS | 46 (1.5) | 744 (92) | 158 (18) | 502 (39) | 11 (1) | 849 (22) | 5122 (490) |
| 25% HS | 47 (3) | 802 (78) | 161 (1) | 487 (33) | 12 (0) | 810 (58) | 4974 (365) |
| 35% HS | 50 (3) | 677 (81) | 143 (2) | 428 (27) | 14 (1) | 642 (17) | 3915 (147) |
| 15% SH | 37 (2) | 1002 (150) | 161 (4) | 568 (43) | 11 (0) | 857 (9) | 5344 (184) |
| 25% SH | 38 (11) | 615 (62) | 158 (2) | 447 (28) | 11 (1) | 700 (114) | 4368 (713) |
| 35% SH | 31 (5) | 520 (69) | 151 (2) | 383 (21) | 14 (1) | 716 (13) | 4371 (127) |
Figure 9Photographs of selected materials after a cone calorimetry tests: 35 wt % WS (A,D), 35 wt % HS (B,E), and 35 wt % SH (C,F).
Figure 10SEM images of the char residue of 35 wt % WS (A), 35 wt % HS (B), 35 wt % SH (C) (top—magnification ×500 and bottom—magnification ×100).
Figure 11Chromatograms from analysis of thermal degradation products of selected modified epoxy composites at 650 °C.
Thermal degradation products of selected modified epoxy composites at 650 °C.
| Peak Number | Retention Time (min) | Compound | Emissionyields (peakarea %) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP | 35 wt % WS | 35 wt % HS | 35 wt % SH | |||
| 1 | 1.50 | COx, NOx, H2O | 1.60 | 2.51 | 1.51 | 4.41 |
| 2 | 9.49 | Styrene | 0.16 | 0.33 | 0.39 | 0.39 |
| 3 | 12.11 | Benzaldehyde | 3.93 | 3.74 | 4.67 | 3.82 |
| 4 | 13.15 | Phenol | 3.67 | 3.96 | 4.47 | 3.12 |
| 5 | 14.95 | Benzylalcohol | 16.04 | 12.29 | 17.31 | 8.99 |
| 6 | 15.62 | 2-methylphenol | 1.14 | 0.60 | 0.67 | |
| 7 | 16.33 | 3-methylphenol | 0.93 | 0.68 | ||
| 8 | 19.58 | Naphthalene | 7.11 | 5.34 | 4.97 | 3.19 |
| 9 | 21.16 | 2,3-dihydro-benzofuran | 5.95 | 3.01 | 2.49 | 2.73 |
| 10 | 22.82 | 1-methylnaphthalene | 2.46 | 2.11 | 1.99 | 0.86 |
| 11 | 23.29 | 2-methylnaphthalene | 1.67 | 1.24 | 1.28 | |
| 12 | 23.87 | p-isopropenylphenol | 13.82 | 8.20 | 9.12 | 5.96 |
| 13 | 25.18 | Biphenyl | 4.07 | 4.66 | 3.57 | 2.48 |
| 14 | 25.83 | 1,3-dimethyl-naphthalene | 1.07 | 1.08 | ||
| 15 | 26.03 | Ethenylnaphthalene | 0.68 | 0.77 | ||
| 16 | 26.68 | 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-2,5,8-trimethyl-1-naphthalenol | 0.49 | 0.57 | 0.73 | |
| 17 | 27.04 | Acenaphthylene | 8.13 | 14.12 | 14.17 | 10.20 |
| 18 | 27.56 | 1-dodecanol | 4.63 | 6.92 | 11.15 | 3.53 |
| 19 | 27.92 | 1-isopropyl-naphthalene | 1.44 | 1.78 | 1.13 | |
| 20 | 28.74 | Dibenzofuran | 0.67 | 1.22 | 0.82 | 1.24 |
| 21 | 30.44 | Fluorene | 1.78 | 4.70 | 4.51 | 7.77 |