| Literature DB >> 28773639 |
Beata Strzemiecka1, Łukasz Klapiszewski2, Artur Jamrozik3, Tadeusz J Szalaty4, Danuta Matykiewicz5, Tomasz Sterzyński6, Adam Voelkel7, Teofil Jesionowski8.
Abstract
Functional lignin-SiO₂ hybrid fillers were prepared for potential application in binders for phenolic resins, and their chemical structure was characterized. The properties of these fillers and of composites obtained from them with phenolic resin were compared with those of systems with lignin or silica alone. The chemical structure of the materials was investigated by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (13C CP MAS NMR). The thermal stability of the new functional fillers was examined by thermogravimetric analysis-mass spectrometry (TG-MS). Thermo-mechanical properties of the lignin-silica hybrids and resin systems were investigated by dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA). The DMTA results showed that abrasive composites with lignin-SiO₂ fillers have better thermo-mechanical properties than systems with silica alone. Thus, fillers based on lignin might provide new, promising properties for the abrasive industry, combining the good properties of lignin as a plasticizer and of silica as a filler improving mechanical properties.Entities:
Keywords: abrasive tools; lignin; lignin–silica fillers; phenolic resins; thermo-mechanical and physicochemical properties
Year: 2016 PMID: 28773639 PMCID: PMC5456845 DOI: 10.3390/ma9070517
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1FT-IR spectra of: the precursors silica and lignin (a,b); and lignin–silica hybrid materials (c,d).
Vibrational frequency wavenumbers (cm−1) observed for lignin, silica and lignin–silica hybrid fillers.
| Kraft Lignin (cm−1) | Silica (cm−1) | Lignin–Silica Hybrid Filler (cm−1) | Vibrational Assignment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3426 | 3142 | 3434 | O−H stretching |
| 2940 | – | 2940 | CHx stretching |
| 1637 | – | 1637 | C=O stretching |
| – | 1602 | 1601 | H2O (physically adsorbed water) |
| 1600 | – | 1600 | C−C, C=C (aromatic skeleton), stretching |
| 1509 | – | 1508 | |
| 1465 | – | 1467 | C−H (CH3 + CH2), bending |
| 1421 | – | 1424 | C−C, C=C (aromatic skeleton), stretching |
| 1271 | – | 1271 | C−O (guaiacyl unit) stretching |
| 1219 | – | 1222 | C−OH (phenolic OH) stretching |
| 1143 | – | 1142 | Aromatic C−H (guaiacyl unit), stretching |
| – | 1107 | 1110 | Si−O−Si stretching |
| 1080 | – | 1085 | C−O stretching |
| 1045 | – | 1044 | C−OH + C−O−C (aliphatic OH + ether) stretching |
| 856 | – | – | Aromatic C−H (guaiacyl unit), bending |
| – | 845 | 845 | Si−O asymmetric stretching |
| – | 812 | 809 | Si−O symmetric stretching |
| 744 | – | 746 | Aromatic C−H (guaiacyl unit), bending |
| 536 | – | 531 | CHx bending |
| – | 473 | 476 | Si−O bending |
Figure 213C CP MAS NMR spectra of: lignin and silica (a); and lignin–silica hybrid fillers (b).
Chemical shifts (ppm) observed for lignin, silica and lignin–silica hybrid fillers.
| Kraft Lignin (ppm) | Lignin–Silica Hybrid Filler (ppm) | Assignment |
|---|---|---|
| 14.2 | 14.3 | |
| 35.3 | 34.0 | CH3 group, ketones (conj.) or in aliphatic |
| 54.0 | 55.2 | C– |
| 55.6 | 56.0 | C in Ar–OCH3 |
| 62.0 | 62.0 | C– |
| 64.3 | – | C– |
| 71.1 | 71.0 | C– |
| 72.0 | 72.0 | C– |
| 72.5 | – | C– |
| 83.0 | 82.9 | C– |
| 85.1 | – | C– |
| 110.5 | 111.0 | C–2 in guaiacyl units |
| 112.0 | – | C–2 in G units |
| 115.1 | – | C–5 in G units |
| 118.7 | 119.0 | C–6 in G units |
| 122.0 | – | C–1 and C–6 in Ar–C(=O)C–C units |
| 125.2 | 125.0 | C–5, non-etherified 5–5 |
| 128.0 | – | C–2/C–6, in H units |
| 131.2 | – | C–1, non-etherified 5–5 |
| 132.3 | – | C–5, etherified 5–5 |
| 133.2 | 133.0 | C–1 in non-etherified G and S units |
| 138.1 | 137.5 | C–4, syringyl etherified |
| 148.2 | 148.8 | C–3, guaiacyl units |
| 151.2 | 150.5 | C–3/C–5, etherified S units |
| 169.5 | – | C=O in |
Figure 3Thermogravimetric curves for lignin, silica and lignin–silica hybrid fillers.
Compounds detected in TG-MS analysis for lignin–silica hybrid fillers and pure lignin.
| Compound | Lignin–SiO2 (8:1, wt./wt.) | Lignin–SiO2 (8:2, wt./wt.) | Lignin–SiO2 (8:4, wt./wt.) | Lignin–SiO2 (8:6, wt./wt.) | Lignin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon dioxide | + | + | + | + | + |
| Sulfur dioxide | + | + | + | + | + |
| Methanethiol | + | + | + | + | + |
| Acetone | + | + | + | + | + |
| Dimethyl sulfide | + | + | + | + | + |
| Acetic acid | + | + | + | + | + |
| Furan, 3-methyl | + | + | + | − | − |
| 1,3-cyclohexadiene | + | + | + | − | − |
| 2-propanone, 1-hydroxy | + | + | + | + | + |
| Benzene | + | + | + | + | - |
| Phenol | + | + | + | + | + |
| Phenol, 2-methyl | + | + | + | + | + |
| P-cresol | + | + | + | + | + |
| Phenol, 2-methoxy | + | + | + | + | + |
| Benzene, 1,2-dimethoxy | + | + | + | + | + |
| Phenol, 2,4-dimethyl | + | + | + | + | + |
| Phenol, 2,3-dimethyl | + | + | + | + | + |
| Phenol, 4-ethyl | + | + | + | + | + |
| Cresol | + | + | + | + | + |
| Benzene, 1-ethyl-2-methoxy | + | − | − | − | − |
| Benzene, 4-ethyl-2-methoxy | + | + | + | − | + |
| 2-methoxy-4-vinylphenol | + | − | − | − | + |
| Vanillin | + | + | + | − | + |
Figure 4Dynamic mechanical storage modulus G’ (a) and tan δ (b) versus temperature for composites consisting of 80% abrasive grains and with filler (lignin, silica or lignin–silica hybrids).
Values of storage modulus G’ and glass transition temperature Tg for composites based on lignin–silica hybrids and pure lignin.
| Sample | G’ 25 °C (GPa) | G’ 50 °C (GPa) | G’ 300 °C (GPa) | tan | Tg (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lignin–SiO2 (8:1, wt./wt.) | 1.80 | 1.74 | 0.82 | 0.0654 | 252 |
| Lignin–SiO2 (8:2, wt./wt.) | 2.21 | 2.16 | 0.88 | 0.0718 | 250 |
| Lignin–SiO2 (8:4, wt./wt.) | 1.43 | 1.39 | 0.52 | 0.0708 | 220 |
| Lignin–SiO2 (8:6, wt./wt.) | 1.66 | 1.62 | 0.73 | 0.0748 | 230 |
| Lignin | 2.00 | 1.95 | 0.88 | 0.0859 | 206 |