Literature DB >> 31348834

Digital versus conventional impression method in children: Comfort, preference and time.

Hakan Yilmaz1, Merve Nur Aydin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The comfortness and effectiveness of digital and conventional impression methods in children have not yet been compared. AIM: To assess the digital and conventional impression methods in children in terms of comfort, preference, and the time required to take impressions.
DESIGN: Digital impressions were taken by using an intraoral scanner, and conventional impressions were taken by using alginate from 28 patients by the same operator. In each impression-taking-process, comfort was assessed by both the children and the clinician, and the chairside times were written. Student's t tests and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for statistical analyses, and P < .05 was considered to be significant.
RESULTS: The digital impression was considered to be more comfortable in the assessments by both the children and the clinician (P < .001). The total time the digital impression took was 465.89 ± 76.71 second(s) while that of the conventional impression was 450.25 ± 64.08 s when the chairside times of the two impression methods were compared. There was no statistically significant difference (P = .41).
CONCLUSION: The digital impression method compared with the conventional impression method was found to be both more comfortable and preferable by the children, but there was no difference in terms of the time required to take impressions.
© 2019 BSPD, IAPD and John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  children; clinical efficiency; digital impression; patient comfort

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31348834     DOI: 10.1111/ipd.12566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Paediatr Dent        ISSN: 0960-7439            Impact factor:   3.455


  3 in total

1.  The transfer accuracy of digital and conventional full-arch impressions influenced by fixed orthodontic appliances: a reference aid-based in vitro study.

Authors:  Maximiliane Amelie Schlenz; Katharina Klaus; Alexander Schmidt; Bernd Wöstmann; Marco Mersmann; Sabine Ruf; Niko Christian Bock
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 2.  Digitainers-Digital Space Maintainers: A Review.

Authors:  Kiran Gs Dhanotra; Rupinder Bhatia
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2021

3.  Determination of proper band size for stainless steel crowns of primary second molars: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mohammad Moradinia; Hamid Sarlak; Elham Mohammad-Rabei; Amir Almasi-Hashiani; Alireza Shamsi
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2022-08-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.