Literature DB >> 31348511

From obligation to opportunity: future of patient-reported outcome measures at the Veterans Health Administration.

Theresa M Coles1, Sarah M Wilson2,3,4, Bo Kim5,6, Jean C Beckham3,4,7, Warren A Kinghorn3,4,8.   

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are particularly important in mental health services because patients are the central and essential source of information about their mental health status. PRO measures have the potential to engage patients in meaningful and focused conversations during clinical encounters, but unfortunately they often do not serve this purpose in mental health care. Administration of routine outcome measures has often been viewed by clinicians as an obligatory quality improvement process that takes time away from the clinical encounter. This commentary describes current practical barriers to using PRO measures in practice. Then, focusing specifically on the Veterans Health Administration, a unit of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), we propose processes within which PRO measures in mental health services could support the clinical encounter and enhance patient-centered mental health care. With the increasing number of Accountable Care Organizations and other integrated health-care systems that focus on mental health-care delivery, VA has an opportunity to leverage its long-standing electronic medical record technologies and integrated health system to serve as a model for incorporating PRO measures into mental health-care practices. This commentary provides a vision for the future of mental health delivery by incorporating PRO measures at the VA and in other health-care systems. © Society of Behavioral Medicine 2019. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mental health; Patient-reported outcome; Routine outcome measure; Veterans Health Administration

Year:  2019        PMID: 31348511      PMCID: PMC6875646          DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibz121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Behav Med        ISSN: 1613-9860            Impact factor:   3.046


  26 in total

1.  Assessing mHealth: opportunities and barriers to patient engagement.

Authors:  Thomas Martin
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-08

Review 2.  Using feedback from patient-reported outcome measures in mental health services: a scoping study and typology.

Authors:  Christian U Krägeloh; Karol J Czuba; D Rex Billington; Paula Kersten; Richard J Siegert
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Patient-Reported Outcomes - Are They Living Up to Their Potential?

Authors:  Judith F Baumhauer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Rules of engagement in mobile health: what does mobile health bring to research and theory?

Authors:  Cigdem Sahin
Journal:  Contemp Nurse       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 1.787

5.  Barriers and Benefits to the Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Clinical Care: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Lindsey M Philpot; Sunni A Barnes; Rachel M Brown; Jessica A Austin; Cameron S James; Richard H Stanford; Jon O Ebbert
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 6.  Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Neil K Aaronson; Ali K Choucair; Thomas E Elliott; Joanne Greenhalgh; Michele Y Halyard; Rachel Hess; Deborah M Miller; Bryce B Reeve; Maria Santana
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test.

Authors:  K Bush; D R Kivlahan; M B McDonell; S D Fihn; K A Bradley
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-09-14

8.  Quality improvement with pay-for-performance incentives in integrated behavioral health care.

Authors:  Jürgen Unützer; Ya-Fen Chan; Erin Hafer; Jessica Knaster; Anne Shields; Diane Powers; Richard C Veith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  What do these scores mean? Presenting patient-reported outcomes data to patients and clinicians to improve interpretability.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Katherine C Smith; Elissa T Bantug; Elliott E Tolbert; Amanda L Blackford; Michael D Brundage
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Enhancing implementation of measurement-based mental health care in primary care: a mixed-methods randomized effectiveness evaluation of implementation facilitation.

Authors:  Laura O Wray; Mona J Ritchie; David W Oslin; Gregory P Beehler
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.