OBJECTIVES: We evaluated a quality improvement program with a pay-for-performance (P4P) incentive in a population-focused, integrated care program for safety-net patients in 29 community health clinics. METHODS: We used a quasi-experimental design with 1673 depressed adults before and 6304 adults after the implementation of the P4P program. Survival analyses examined the time to improvement in depression before and after implementation of the P4P program, with adjustments for patient characteristics and clustering by health care organization. RESULTS: Program participants had high levels of depression, other psychiatric and substance abuse problems, and social adversity. After implementation of the P4P incentive program, participants were more likely to experience timely follow-up, and the time to depression improvement was significantly reduced. The hazard ratio for achieving treatment response was 1.73 (95% confidence interval=1.39, 2.14) after the P4P program implementation compared with pre-program implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Although this quasi-experiment cannot prove that the P4P initiative directly caused improved patient outcomes, our analyses strongly suggest that when key quality indicators are tracked and a substantial portion of payment is tied to such quality indicators, the effectiveness of care for safety-net populations can be substantially improved.
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated a quality improvement program with a pay-for-performance (P4P) incentive in a population-focused, integrated care program for safety-net patients in 29 community health clinics. METHODS: We used a quasi-experimental design with 1673 depressed adults before and 6304 adults after the implementation of the P4P program. Survival analyses examined the time to improvement in depression before and after implementation of the P4P program, with adjustments for patient characteristics and clustering by health care organization. RESULTS: Program participants had high levels of depression, other psychiatric and substance abuse problems, and social adversity. After implementation of the P4P incentive program, participants were more likely to experience timely follow-up, and the time to depression improvement was significantly reduced. The hazard ratio for achieving treatment response was 1.73 (95% confidence interval=1.39, 2.14) after the P4P program implementation compared with pre-program implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Although this quasi-experiment cannot prove that the P4P initiative directly caused improved patient outcomes, our analyses strongly suggest that when key quality indicators are tracked and a substantial portion of payment is tied to such quality indicators, the effectiveness of care for safety-net populations can be substantially improved.
Authors: Peter Roy-Byrne; Michelle G Craske; Greer Sullivan; Raphael D Rose; Mark J Edlund; Ariel J Lang; Alexander Bystritsky; Stacy Shaw Welch; Denise A Chavira; Daniela Golinelli; Laura Campbell-Sills; Cathy D Sherbourne; Murray B Stein Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-05-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jürgen Unützer; Wayne Katon; Christopher M Callahan; John W Williams; Enid Hunkeler; Linda Harpole; Marc Hoffing; Richard D Della Penna; Polly Hitchcock Noël; Elizabeth H B Lin; Patricia A Areán; Mark T Hegel; Lingqi Tang; Thomas R Belin; Sabine Oishi; Christopher Langston Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-12-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Wayne J Katon; Elizabeth H B Lin; Michael Von Korff; Paul Ciechanowski; Evette J Ludman; Bessie Young; Do Peterson; Carolyn M Rutter; Mary McGregor; David McCulloch Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-12-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: John C Fortney; Jeffrey M Pyne; Susan Ward-Jones; Ian M Bennett; Joan Diehl; Kellee Farris; Joseph M Cerimele; Geoffrey M Curran Journal: Fam Syst Health Date: 2018-05-28 Impact factor: 1.950
Authors: Audrey L Jones; Susan D Cochran; Arleen Leibowitz; Kenneth B Wells; Gerald Kominski; Vickie M Mays Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Aaron R Lyon; Michael D Pullmann; Kelly Whitaker; Kristy Ludwig; Jessica Knaster Wasse; Elizabeth McCauley Journal: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol Date: 2017-03-02
Authors: Bonnie T Jortberg; Benjamin F Miller; Robert A Gabbay; Kerri Sparling; W Perry Dickinson Journal: Curr Diab Rep Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 4.810