Literature DB >> 3134846

Aminoglycoside resistance among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates with an unusual disk diffusion antibiogram.

R B Clark1, C C Sanders, C B Pakiz, M K Hostetter.   

Abstract

In recent years, a number of clinical microbiology laboratories have isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa with the unusual aminoglycoside disk diffusion result of resistance to both amikacin and gentamicin but susceptibility to tobramycin (ArGrTs). A total of 39 isolates of P. aeruginosa reported to have this resistance pattern were retested by the standard National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards disk diffusion procedure; 30 strains (77%) were confirmed to be ArGrTs. These 30 isolates were further examined for susceptibility to those aminoglycosides by agar dilution and broth micro- and macrodilution methods. Only 27, 27, and 23% of the isolates appeared to be ArGrTs by agar, broth microdilution, and broth macrodilution testing, respectively. Most of the remaining isolates were resistant to all three aminoglycosides when tested by broth dilution and resistant only to gentamicin when tested by agar dilution. The percentages of strains resistant to any particular aminoglycoside by agar dilution, broth microdilution, and broth macrodilution, respectively, were 43, 80, and 70 for amikacin, 97, 93, and 100 for gentamicin, 100, 100, and 100 for netilmicin, 30, 87, and 93 for sisomicin, and 13, 57, and 50 for tobramycin. These results indicate that strains showing the unusual aminoglycoside antibiogram are less susceptible to aminoglycosides in general and should probably be considered borderline resistant to all aminoglycosides. The efficacy of aminoglycosides in the treatment of infections produced by these strains is unknown.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3134846      PMCID: PMC172253          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.32.5.689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  11 in total

1.  Antibiotic susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: selection of a control strain and criteria for magnesium and calcium content in media.

Authors:  L B Reller; F D Schoenknecht; M A Kenny; J C Sherris
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  Discrepancies between in vitro activity of and in vivo response to antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  J A Washington
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.803

3.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to carbenicillin and gentamicin. Epidemiologic and clinical aspects in a cancer center.

Authors:  W H Greene; M Moody; S Schimpff; V M Young; P H Wiernik
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Amikacin therapy for serious gram-negative bacillary infections.

Authors:  R D Meyer; R P Lewis; E D Carmalt; S M Finegold
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Phenotypic factors correlated with the absence of virulence among gentamicin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains.

Authors:  R B Clark; J M Janda; E J Bottone
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  In vitro evaluations of amikacin: an assessment of the currently used methods of disk diffusion and dilution susceptibility, antimicrobial synergy, and the measurement of amikacin concentrations.

Authors:  R N Jones
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1986-06-30       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Broth microdilution testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and aminoglycosides: need for employing dilutions differing by small arithmetic increments.

Authors:  B F Woolfrey; J M Fox; R T Lally; C O Quall
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Gentamicin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Mayo Clinic Experience, 1970-1976.

Authors:  T F Keys; J A Washington
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Influence of cation supplements on activity of netilmicin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  A L Barry; G H Miller; C Thornsberry; R S Hare; R N Jones; R R Lorber; R Ferraresi; C Cramer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Comparison of aminoglycoside resistance patterns in Japan, Formosa, and Korea, Chile, and the United States.

Authors:  K Shimizu; T Kumada; W C Hsieh; H Y Chung; Y Chong; R S Hare; G H Miller; F J Sabatelli; J Howard
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  3 in total

1.  Synergistic activity of aminoglycoside-beta-lactam combinations against Pseudomonas aeruginosa with an unusual aminoglycoside antibiogram.

Authors:  R B Clark; C B Pakiz; M K Hostetter
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Comparison of the Sceptor Pseudomonas Plus MIC Panel with agar dilution for susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  L F Joyce; K Stockman; J Downes; J H Andrew
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of five methods, including the PDM Epsilometer test (E test), for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  L F Joyce; J Downes; K Stockman; J H Andrew
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.948

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.