Terry Ma1, Di Xiao1, Xin Xing2. 1. Department of Statistics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30601. 2. Department of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Metagenomics studies microbial genomes in an ecosystem such as the gastrointestinal tract of a human. Identification of novel microbial species and quantification of their distributional variations among different samples that are sequenced using next-generation-sequencing technology hold the key to the success of most metagenomic studies. To achieve these goals, we propose a simple yet powerful metagenomic binning method, MetaBMF. The method does not require prior knowledge of reference genomes and produces highly accurate results, even at a strain level. Thus, it can be broadly used to identify disease-related microbial organisms that are not well-studied. RESULTS: Mathematically, we count the number of mapped reads on each assembled genomic fragment cross different samples as our input matrix and propose a scalable stratified angle regression algorithm to factorize this count matrix into a product of a binary matrix and a nonnegative matrix. The binary matrix can be used to separate microbial species and the nonnegative matrix quantifies the species distributions in different samples. In simulation and empirical studies, we demonstrate that MetaBMF has a high binning accuracy. It can not only bin DNA fragments accurately at a species level but also at a strain level. As shown in our example, we can accurately identify the Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli O104: H4 strain which led to the 2011 German E.coli outbreak. Our efforts in these areas should lead to (i) fundamental advances in metagenomic binning, (ii) development and refinement of technology for the rapid identification and quantification of microbial distributions and (iii) finding of potential probiotics or reliable pathogenic bacterial strains. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software is available at https://github.com/didi10384/MetaBMF.
MOTIVATION: Metagenomics studies microbial genomes in an ecosystem such as the gastrointestinal tract of a human. Identification of novel microbial species and quantification of their distributional variations among different samples that are sequenced using next-generation-sequencing technology hold the key to the success of most metagenomic studies. To achieve these goals, we propose a simple yet powerful metagenomic binning method, MetaBMF. The method does not require prior knowledge of reference genomes and produces highly accurate results, even at a strain level. Thus, it can be broadly used to identify disease-related microbial organisms that are not well-studied. RESULTS: Mathematically, we count the number of mapped reads on each assembled genomic fragment cross different samples as our input matrix and propose a scalable stratified angle regression algorithm to factorize this count matrix into a product of a binary matrix and a nonnegative matrix. The binary matrix can be used to separate microbial species and the nonnegative matrix quantifies the species distributions in different samples. In simulation and empirical studies, we demonstrate that MetaBMF has a high binning accuracy. It can not only bin DNA fragments accurately at a species level but also at a strain level. As shown in our example, we can accurately identify the Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli O104: H4 strain which led to the 2011 German E.coli outbreak. Our efforts in these areas should lead to (i) fundamental advances in metagenomic binning, (ii) development and refinement of technology for the rapid identification and quantification of microbial distributions and (iii) finding of potential probiotics or reliable pathogenic bacterial strains. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software is available at https://github.com/didi10384/MetaBMF.
Authors: Hanno Teeling; Anke Meyerdierks; Margarete Bauer; Rudolf Amann; Frank Oliver Glöckner Journal: Environ Microbiol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 5.491
Authors: Johannes Alneberg; Brynjar Smári Bjarnason; Ino de Bruijn; Melanie Schirmer; Joshua Quick; Umer Z Ijaz; Leo Lahti; Nicholas J Loman; Anders F Andersson; Christopher Quince Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2014-09-14 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Christopher T Brown; Austin G Davis-Richardson; Adriana Giongo; Kelsey A Gano; David B Crabb; Nabanita Mukherjee; George Casella; Jennifer C Drew; Jorma Ilonen; Mikael Knip; Heikki Hyöty; Riitta Veijola; Tuula Simell; Olli Simell; Josef Neu; Clive H Wasserfall; Desmond Schatz; Mark A Atkinson; Eric W Triplett Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-10-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: M Million; M Maraninchi; M Henry; F Armougom; H Richet; P Carrieri; R Valero; D Raccah; B Vialettes; D Raoult Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2011-08-09 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Michael Imelfort; Donovan Parks; Ben J Woodcroft; Paul Dennis; Philip Hugenholtz; Gene W Tyson Journal: PeerJ Date: 2014-09-30 Impact factor: 2.984