Literature DB >> 31347403

eHealth Interventions for Fruit and Vegetable Intake: A Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness.

Norma Patricia Rodriguez Rocha1, Hyekyeong Kim1.   

Abstract

Background. An adequate intake of fruits and vegetables (FVI) has shown benefits for reduced risk of manifesting chronic diseases. Thus, development of effective interventions to promote FVI is paramount. Aim. To assess the effectiveness of eHealth interventions for FVI targeted to healthy population, in comparison with control groups, and identify the moderators contributing to their effectiveness. Method. A database search was conducted in April 2016 and July 2018 using MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ERIC, Google Scholar, SciELO, and RISS, yielding 19 eligible studies. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias Tool. Random-effects model was used to calculate effect sizes (ES) by weighted standardized mean differences. Results. This meta-analysis includes 19 studies and 6,894 participants. The most common eHealth tool used was Internet-based interventions (n = 10). Most of studies were conducted in adults (n = 11), followed by children (n = 4), and adolescents (n = 4). The minimum number of behavior change techniques (BCTs) used was one, and the maximum seven. The overall ES was small (0.26, p < .001), favoring eHealth interventions. The between-studies heterogeneity was large (I2 = 62.77%, p < .001). Subgroup analyses showed that the components with larger ES were tailored interventions (0.27, p < .001), computer-based interventions (0.44, p < .001), and use of ≥7 BCTs (0.42, p < .001). Discussion. All studies showed a positive ES favoring interventions. Large heterogeneity could be explained in part by the number of BCTs and type of eHealth tool used. Nonetheless, more concrete evidence regarding other intervention components effectiveness was limited by small sample size. Conclusion. The use of eHealth tools for the improvement of FVI showed to be more effective compared with nonintervention and interventions not using these technologies. Nonetheless, more research is needed to determine the specific combination of intervention components that could translate into larger effectiveness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavioral theories; computer-mediated health promotion; health behavior; health promotion; tailored or targeted interventions

Year:  2019        PMID: 31347403     DOI: 10.1177/1090198119859396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Behav        ISSN: 1090-1981


  7 in total

Review 1.  E-&mHealth interventions targeting nutrition, physical activity, sedentary behavior, and/or obesity among children: A scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Chelsea L Kracht; Melinda Hutchesson; Mavra Ahmed; Andre Matthias Müller; Lee M Ashton; Hannah M Brown; Ann DeSmet; Carol A Maher; Chelsea E Mauch; Corneel Vandelanotte; Zenong Yin; Megan Whatnall; Camille E Short; Amanda E Staiano
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 9.213

2.  Consolidating evidence on the effectiveness of interventions promoting fruit and vegetable consumption: an umbrella review.

Authors:  Luke Wolfenden; Courtney Barnes; Cassandra Lane; Sam McCrabb; Hannah M Brown; Sarah Gerritsen; Simon Barquera; Lesly Samara Véjar; Ana Munguía; Sze Lin Yoong
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 3.  Digital Interventions to Promote Healthy Eating in Children: Umbrella Review.

Authors:  Rachel Prowse; Sarah Carsley
Journal:  JMIR Pediatr Parent       Date:  2021-11-25

4.  Relative validity and reproducibility of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire to assess fruit and vegetable consumption in school-aged children.

Authors:  Ana Ilić; Ivana Rumbak; Ružica Brečić; Irena Colić Barić; Martina Bituh
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-08-17

5.  Key facets to build up eHealth and mHealth interventions to enhance physical activity, sedentary behavior and nutrition in healthy subjects - an umbrella review.

Authors:  Janis Fiedler; Tobias Eckert; Kathrin Wunsch; Alexander Woll
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  What Are We Measuring When We Evaluate Digital Interventions for Improving Lifestyle? A Scoping Meta-Review.

Authors:  Rodolfo Castro; Marcelo Ribeiro-Alves; Cátia Oliveira; Carmen Phang Romero; Hugo Perazzo; Mario Simjanoski; Flavio Kapciznki; Vicent Balanzá-Martínez; Raquel B De Boni
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-01-03

Review 7.  Culturally adapting internet- and mobile-based health promotion interventions might not be worth the effort: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sumeyye Balci; Kerstin Spanhel; Lasse Bosse Sander; Harald Baumeister
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-03-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.