Luke Wolfenden1,2, Courtney Barnes3, Cassandra Lane3, Sam McCrabb3, Hannah M Brown3, Sarah Gerritsen4,5, Simon Barquera4,6, Lesly Samara Véjar6, Ana Munguía6, Sze Lin Yoong7. 1. School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Hunter New England Population Health, Locked Bag 10 Wallsend NSW, Newcastle, NSW, 2287, Australia. Luke.Wolfenden@health.nsw.gov.au. 2. Corporación Actuemos, Santiago, Chile. Luke.Wolfenden@health.nsw.gov.au. 3. School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Hunter New England Population Health, Locked Bag 10 Wallsend NSW, Newcastle, NSW, 2287, Australia. 4. Corporación Actuemos, Santiago, Chile. 5. School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. 6. Centro de Investigación en Nutrición y Salud, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Mexico. 7. Swinburne University of Technology, School of Health Sciences, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The overarching objective was to examine the effectiveness of intervention strategies to promote fruit and vegetable consumption. To do this, systematic review evidence regarding the effects of intervention strategies was synthesized; organized, where appropriate, by the setting in which the strategies were implemented. Additionally, we sought to describe gaps in the review of evidence; that is, where evidence regarding the effectiveness of recommended policy actions had not been systematically synthesised. METHODS: We undertook a systematic search of electronic databases and the grey literature to identify systematic reviews describing the effects of any intervention strategy targeting fruit and/or vegetable intake in children or adults of any age. RESULTS: The effects of 32 intervention strategies were synthesised from the 19 included reviews. The strategies were mapped across all three broad domains of the NOURISHING framework (i.e. food environment, food system and behaviour change communication), but covered just 14 of the framework's 65 sub-policy areas. There was evidence supporting the effectiveness of 19 of the 32 intervention strategies. The findings of the umbrella review suggest that intervention strategies implemented within schools, childcare services, homes, workplaces and primary care can be effective, as can eHealth strategies, mass media campaigns, household food production strategies and fiscal interventions. CONCLUSIONS: A range of effective strategy options are available for policy makers and practitioners interested in improving fruit and/or vegetable intake. However, the effects of many strategies - particularly those targeting agricultural production practices, the supply chain and the broader food system - have not been reported in systematic reviews. Primary studies assessing the effects of these strategies, and the inclusion of such studies in systematic reviews, are needed to better inform national and international efforts to improve public health nutrition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The review protocol was deposited in a publicly available Open Science framework prior to execution of the search strategy. https://osf.io/unj7x/.
BACKGROUND: The overarching objective was to examine the effectiveness of intervention strategies to promote fruit and vegetable consumption. To do this, systematic review evidence regarding the effects of intervention strategies was synthesized; organized, where appropriate, by the setting in which the strategies were implemented. Additionally, we sought to describe gaps in the review of evidence; that is, where evidence regarding the effectiveness of recommended policy actions had not been systematically synthesised. METHODS: We undertook a systematic search of electronic databases and the grey literature to identify systematic reviews describing the effects of any intervention strategy targeting fruit and/or vegetable intake in children or adults of any age. RESULTS: The effects of 32 intervention strategies were synthesised from the 19 included reviews. The strategies were mapped across all three broad domains of the NOURISHING framework (i.e. food environment, food system and behaviour change communication), but covered just 14 of the framework's 65 sub-policy areas. There was evidence supporting the effectiveness of 19 of the 32 intervention strategies. The findings of the umbrella review suggest that intervention strategies implemented within schools, childcare services, homes, workplaces and primary care can be effective, as can eHealth strategies, mass media campaigns, household food production strategies and fiscal interventions. CONCLUSIONS: A range of effective strategy options are available for policy makers and practitioners interested in improving fruit and/or vegetable intake. However, the effects of many strategies - particularly those targeting agricultural production practices, the supply chain and the broader food system - have not been reported in systematic reviews. Primary studies assessing the effects of these strategies, and the inclusion of such studies in systematic reviews, are needed to better inform national and international efforts to improve public health nutrition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The review protocol was deposited in a publicly available Open Science framework prior to execution of the search strategy. https://osf.io/unj7x/.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diet; Health promotion; Nutrition policy; Public health; Recommended dietary allowances
Authors: Ashkan Afshin; Jose Penalvo; Liana Del Gobbo; Michael Kashaf; Renata Micha; Kurtis Morrish; Jonathan Pearson-Stuttard; Colin Rehm; Siyi Shangguan; Jessica D Smith; Dariush Mozaffarian Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 2.931
Authors: Nicole Nathan; Lisa Janssen; Rachel Sutherland; Rebecca Kate Hodder; Charlotte E L Evans; Debbie Booth; Sze Lin Yoong; Kathryn Reilly; Meghan Finch; Luke Wolfenden Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2019-04-29 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Daniel Mason-D'Croz; Jessica R Bogard; Timothy B Sulser; Nicola Cenacchi; Shahnila Dunston; Mario Herrero; Keith Wiebe Journal: Lancet Planet Health Date: 2019-07
Authors: Jacklyn Kay Jackson; Jannah Jones; Hanh Nguyen; Isabella Davies; Melanie Lum; Alice Grady; Sze Lin Yoong Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-01-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Melanie Lum; Luke Wolfenden; Jannah Jones; Alice Grady; Hayley Christian; Kathryn Reilly; Sze Lin Yoong Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-10 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Biljana Meshkovska; Daniel A Scheller; Janine Wendt; Hannah Jilani; Marie Scheidmeir; Jan M Stratil; Nanna Lien Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2022-01-31 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Hanna Górska-Warsewicz; Krystyna Rejman; Joanna Kaczorowska; Wacław Laskowski Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-20 Impact factor: 3.390