| Literature DB >> 31345709 |
William L Hamilton1, Roberto Amato2, Rob W van der Pluijm3, Christopher G Jacob4, Huynh Hong Quang5, Nguyen Thanh Thuy-Nhien6, Tran Tinh Hien6, Bouasy Hongvanthong7, Keobouphaphone Chindavongsa7, Mayfong Mayxay8, Rekol Huy9, Rithea Leang9, Cheah Huch9, Lek Dysoley9, Chanaki Amaratunga10, Seila Suon9, Rick M Fairhurst10, Rupam Tripura3, Thomas J Peto3, Yok Sovann11, Podjanee Jittamala12, Borimas Hanboonkunupakarn12, Sasithon Pukrittayakamee13, Nguyen Hoang Chau6, Mallika Imwong14, Mehul Dhorda15, Ranitha Vongpromek16, Xin Hui S Chan3, Richard J Maude17, Richard D Pearson2, T Nguyen4, Kirk Rockett18, Eleanor Drury4, Sónia Gonçalves4, Nicholas J White3, Nicholas P Day3, Dominic P Kwiatkowski19, Arjen M Dondorp3, Olivo Miotto20.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A multidrug-resistant co-lineage of Plasmodium falciparum malaria, named KEL1/PLA1, spread across Cambodia in 2008-13, causing high rates of treatment failure with the frontline combination therapy dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine. Here, we report on the evolution and spread of KEL1/PLA1 in subsequent years.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31345709 PMCID: PMC6715858 DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30392-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lancet Infect Dis ISSN: 1473-3099 Impact factor: 71.421
Figure 1Rise in KEL1/PLA1 prevalence over time in eastern southeast Asia
(A) Proportions of different combinations of KEL1 and PLA1 alleles, across three time periods (2007–11, 2012–15, and 2016–18) in the eastern southeast Asia regions surveyed in this study. (B) Change in the frequency of KEL1/PLA1 parasites during the same time periods in different geographical regions within eastern southeast Asia.
Figure 2Genetic similarity among KEL1/PLA1 parasites across geographical regions
(A) Boxplot comparing the distribution of pairwise genetic distance in non-KEL1/PLA1 parasites (ie, carrying neither KEL1 nor PLA1 haplotypes, n=777) with the distribution in KEL1/PLA1 parasites (n=551). (B) Boxplot comparing the distribution of pairwise distance between KEL1/PLA1 and non-KEL1/PLA1 parasites in the same geographical region (blue); and between KEL1/PLA1 parasites in the region and KEL1/PLA1 parasites outside the region (red). The number of samples analysed (in the following order: KEL1/PLA1 in the region, KEL1/PLA1 outside the region, and non-KEL1/PLA1 in the region) was 22, 529, and 14 in northeastern Thailand; 32, 519, and 193 in Laos; and 162, 389, and 207 in Vietnam. In both plots, pairwise genetic distance is expressed in an arbitrary unit, which is a function of the number of genetic differences observed among variant single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in this dataset between pairs of samples, after correcting for linkage disequilibrium and heterozygous genotypes. Thick lines represent median values, boxes show the IQR, and whiskers represent extremes of the distribution, discounting outliers.
Figure 3KEL1/PLA1 family tree
The dendrogram shows a hierarchical clustering tree of pairwise genetic distances for all 551 KEL1/PLA1 samples across eastern southeast Asia; longer branches indicate more distant relationships. The six largest subgroups of highly related parasites are shown in red and blue, and labelled below the tree. The alternating colours highlight the different subgroups. These subgroups, numbered in order of decreasing size (subgroup 1, n=84; subgroup 2, n=79; subgroup 3, n=47; subgroup 4, n=36; subgroup 5, n=24; and subgroup 6, n=19), were identified by grouping samples with pairwise genetic distances in the lowest quartile (delimited by a dotted line). Pairwise genetic distance is expressed in an arbitrary unit, which is a function of the number of genetic differences observed among variant single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in this dataset between pairs of samples, after correcting for linkage disequilibrium and heterozygous genotypes.
Figure 4Distinct epidemiological and genetic properties of KEL1/PLA1 subgroups
Sample proportions by sampling time period (A) and location (B) in the six largest groups of high-similarity KEL1/PLA1 parasites. Subgroups 1–3 emerged recently and are internationally distributed, whereas subgroups 4 and 6 are older and confined to western Cambodia. Proportion of crt haplotypes in the same groups (C): newly emerging crt mutations are highly prevalent in the newer subgroups 1–3, but absent from the older geographically restricted subgroups 4 and 6, and also in subgroup 5, which has recently expanded in northeastern Cambodia. Numbers of samples are as follows: n=84 for subgroup 1, n=79 for subgroup 2, n=47 for subgroup 3, n=36 for subgroup 4, n=24 for subgroup 5, and n=19 for subgroup 6. Together, these samples comprise more than 50% of the 551 analysed KEL1/PLA1 samples.