Literature DB >> 31344432

Radiomics Analysis for Glioma Malignancy Evaluation Using Diffusion Kurtosis and Tensor Imaging.

Satoshi Takahashi1, Wataru Takahashi2, Shota Tanaka3, Akihiro Haga4, Takahiro Nakamoto2, Yuichi Suzuki2, Akitake Mukasa5, Shunsaku Takayanagi1, Yosuke Kitagawa1, Taijun Hana1, Takahide Nejo1, Masashi Nomura1, Keiichi Nakagawa2, Nobuhito Saito1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A noninvasive diagnostic method to predict the degree of malignancy accurately would be of great help in glioma management. This study aimed to create a highly accurate machine learning model to perform glioma grading. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging acquired for cases of glioma operated on at our institution from October 2014 through January 2018 were obtained retrospectively. Six types of magnetic resonance imaging sequences (T2-weighted image, diffusion-weighted image, apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC], fractional anisotropy, and mean kurtosis [MK]) were chosen for analysis; 476 features were extracted semiautomatically for each sequence (2856 features in total). Recursive feature elimination was used to select significant features for a machine learning model that distinguishes glioblastoma from lower-grade glioma (grades 2 and 3).
RESULTS: Fifty-five data sets from 54 cases were obtained (14 grade 2 gliomas, 12 grade 3 gliomas, and 29 glioblastomas), of which 44 and 11 data sets were used for machine learning and independent testing, respectively. We detected 504 features with significant differences (false discovery rate <0.05) between glioblastoma and lower-grade glioma. The most accurate machine learning model was created using 6 features extracted from the ADC and MK images. In the logistic regression, the area under the curve was 0.90 ± 0.05, and the accuracy of the test data set was 0.91 (10 out of 11); using a support vector machine, they were 0.93 ± 0.03 and 0.91 (10 out of 11), respectively (kernel, radial basis function; c = 1.0).
CONCLUSIONS: Our machine learning model accurately predicted glioma tumor grade. The ADC and MK sequences produced particularly useful features.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31344432     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  12 in total

1.  Evaluation of diffuse glioma grade and proliferation activity by different diffusion-weighted-imaging models including diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and mean apparent propagator (MAP) MRI.

Authors:  Sheng-Hui Xie; Rui Lang; Bo Li; He Zhao; Peng Wang; Jin-Long He; Xue-Ying Ma; Qiong Wu; Shao-Yu Wang; Hua-Peng Zhang; Yang Gao; Jian-Lin Wu
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 2.995

2.  MRI-Based Radiomics Differentiates Skull Base Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Erika Yamazawa; Satoshi Takahashi; Masahiro Shin; Shota Tanaka; Wataru Takahashi; Takahiro Nakamoto; Yuichi Suzuki; Hirokazu Takami; Nobuhito Saito
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Probing individual-level structural atrophy in frontal glioma patients.

Authors:  Guobin Zhang; Xiaokang Zhang; Huawei Huang; Yonggang Wang; Haoyi Li; Yunyun Duan; Hongyan Chen; Yaou Liu; Bin Jing; Yanmei Tie; Song Lin
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.800

4.  Developing and validating a deep learning and radiomic model for glioma grading using multiplanar reconstructed magnetic resonance contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging: a robust, multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Jialin Ding; Rubin Zhao; Qingtao Qiu; Jinhu Chen; Jinghao Duan; Xiujuan Cao; Yong Yin
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-02

5.  Brain Tumor Imaging: Applications of Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Muhammad Afridi; Abhi Jain; Mariam Aboian; Seyedmehdi Payabvash
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 1.875

6.  Better efficacy in differentiating WHO grade II from III oligodendrogliomas with machine-learning than radiologist's reading from conventional T1 contrast-enhanced and fluid attenuated inversion recovery images.

Authors:  Sha-Sha Zhao; Xiu-Long Feng; Yu-Chuan Hu; Yu Han; Qiang Tian; Ying-Zhi Sun; Jie Zhang; Xiang-Wei Ge; Si-Chao Cheng; Xiu-Li Li; Li Mao; Shu-Ning Shen; Lin-Feng Yan; Guang-Bin Cui; Wen Wang
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 2.474

7.  CT-based radiomics combined with signs: a valuable tool to help radiologist discriminate COVID-19 and influenza pneumonia.

Authors:  Yilong Huang; Zhenguang Zhang; Siyun Liu; Xiang Li; Yunhui Yang; Jiyao Ma; Zhipeng Li; Jialong Zhou; Yuanming Jiang; Bo He
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 1.930

8.  A simple model for glioma grading based on texture analysis applied to conventional brain MRI.

Authors:  José Gerardo Suárez-García; Javier Miguel Hernández-López; Eduardo Moreno-Barbosa; Benito de Celis-Alonso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Preoperative Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Differentiating Glioblastoma From Low-Grade Gliomas in The Cancer Imaging Archive Database: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Authors:  Huangqi Zhang; Binhao Zhang; Wenting Pan; Xue Dong; Xin Li; Jinyao Chen; Dongnv Wang; Wenbin Ji
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  Applications of radiomics and machine learning for radiotherapy of malignant brain tumors.

Authors:  Martin Kocher; Maximilian I Ruge; Norbert Galldiks; Philipp Lohmann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.