Literature DB >> 35111644

Developing and validating a deep learning and radiomic model for glioma grading using multiplanar reconstructed magnetic resonance contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging: a robust, multi-institutional study.

Jialin Ding1,2, Rubin Zhao3, Qingtao Qiu2, Jinhu Chen2, Jinghao Duan2, Xiujuan Cao2, Yong Yin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although surgical pathology or biopsy are considered the gold standard for glioma grading, these procedures have limitations. This study set out to evaluate and validate the predictive performance of a deep learning radiomics model based on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted multiplanar reconstruction images for grading gliomas.
METHODS: Patients from three institutions who diagnosed with gliomas by surgical specimen and multiplanar reconstructed (MPR) images were enrolled in this study. The training cohort included 101 patients from institution 1, including 43 high-grade glioma (HGG) patients and 58 low-grade glioma (LGG) patients, while the test cohorts consisted of 50 patients from institutions 2 and 3 (25 HGG patients, 25 LGG patients). We then extracted radiomics features and deep learning features using six pretrained models from the MPR images. The Spearman correlation test and the recursive elimination feature selection method were used to reduce the redundancy and select most predictive features. Subsequently, three classifiers were used to construct classification models. The performance of the grading models was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating curve, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision, and negative predictive value. Finally, the prediction performances of the test cohort were compared to determine the optimal classification model.
RESULTS: For the training cohort, 62% (13 out of 21) of the classification models constructed with MPR images from multiple planes outperformed those constructed with single-plane MPR images, and 61% (11 out of 18) of classification models constructed with both radiomics features and deep learning features had higher area under the curve (AUC) values than those constructed with only radiomics or deep learning features. The optimal model was a random forest model that combined radiomic features and VGG16 deep learning features derived from MPR images, which achieved AUC of 0.847 in the training cohort and 0.898 in the test cohort. In the test cohort, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the optimal model were 0.840, 0.760, and 0.800, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Multiplanar CE-T1W MPR imaging features are more effective than features from single planes when differentiating HGG and LGG. The combination of deep learning features and radiomics features can effectively grade glioma and assist clinical decision-making. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Multiplanar reconstruction (MPR); deep learning; gliomas; radiomics

Year:  2022        PMID: 35111644      PMCID: PMC8739133          DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  35 in total

Review 1.  Management of glioblastoma: State of the art and future directions.

Authors:  Aaron C Tan; David M Ashley; Giselle Y López; Michael Malinzak; Henry S Friedman; Mustafa Khasraw
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  RotationNet for Joint Object Categorization and Unsupervised Pose Estimation from Multi-view Images.

Authors:  Asako Kanezaki; Yasuyuki Matsushita; Yoshifumi Nishida
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 6.226

Review 3.  Convolutional Neural Networks for Radiologic Images: A Radiologist's Guide.

Authors:  Shelly Soffer; Avi Ben-Cohen; Orit Shimon; Michal Marianne Amitai; Hayit Greenspan; Eyal Klang
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Primary brain tumours in adults.

Authors:  Sarah Lapointe; Arie Perry; Nicholas A Butowski
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Diagnostic performance of texture analysis on MRI in grading cerebral gliomas.

Authors:  Karoline Skogen; Anselm Schulz; Johann Baptist Dormagen; Balaji Ganeshan; Eirik Helseth; Andrès Server
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Deep Multi-View Enhancement Hashing for Image Retrieval.

Authors:  Chenggang Yan; Biao Gong; Yuxuan Wei; Yue Gao
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 6.226

7.  The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository.

Authors:  Kenneth Clark; Bruce Vendt; Kirk Smith; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Paul Koppel; Stephen Moore; Stanley Phillips; David Maffitt; Michael Pringle; Lawrence Tarbox; Fred Prior
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 8.  Intratumor heterogeneity, microenvironment, and mechanisms of drug resistance in glioma recurrence and evolution.

Authors:  Zhaoshi Bao; Yongzhi Wang; Qiangwei Wang; Shengyu Fang; Xia Shan; Jiguang Wang; Tao Jiang
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 4.592

9.  Considerable effects of imaging sequences, feature extraction, feature selection, and classifiers on radiomics-based prediction of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Houjiao Dai; Minhua Lu; Bingsheng Huang; Mimi Tang; Tiantian Pang; Bing Liao; Huasong Cai; Mengqi Huang; Yongjin Zhou; Xin Chen; Huijun Ding; Shi-Ting Feng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-05
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Machine learning in neuro-oncology: toward novel development fields.

Authors:  Vincenzo Di Nunno; Mario Fordellone; Giuseppe Minniti; Sofia Asioli; Alfredo Conti; Diego Mazzatenta; Damiano Balestrini; Paolo Chiodini; Raffaele Agati; Caterina Tonon; Alicia Tosoni; Lidia Gatto; Stefania Bartolini; Raffaele Lodi; Enrico Franceschi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.506

Review 2.  A Survey of Radiomics in Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Adult Gliomas.

Authors:  Peng Du; Hongyi Chen; Kun Lv; Daoying Geng
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 3.  The Concept of «Peritumoral Zone» in Diffuse Low-Grade Gliomas: Oncological and Functional Implications for a Connectome-Guided Therapeutic Attitude.

Authors:  Melissa Silva; Catalina Vivancos; Hugues Duffau
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-04-15

4.  An automated approach for predicting glioma grade and survival of LGG patients using CNN and radiomics.

Authors:  Chenan Xu; Yuanyuan Peng; Weifang Zhu; Zhongyue Chen; Jianrui Li; Wenhao Tan; Zhiqiang Zhang; Xinjian Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 5.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.