Literature DB >> 31344275

Analysis of proximal bone margins in diabetic foot osteomyelitis by conventional culture, DNA sequencing and microscopy.

Matthew Malone1,2,3, Blaine G Fritz4, Karen Vickery5, Saskia Schwarzer1,3, Varun Sharma1,3, Nathan Biggs3, Michael Radzieta1,2, Thomas T Jeffries1,2, Hugh G Dickson1,3, Slade O Jensen1,2, Thomas Bjarnsholt4,6.   

Abstract

Multiple approaches were employed to detect pathogens from bone margins associated with Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis (DFO). Intra-operative bone specimens of 14 consecutive subjects with suspected DFO were collected over a six-month study period from Liverpool Hospital. Infected bone and a proximal bone margins presumed to be 'clean/non-infected' were collected. Bone material was subjected to conventional culture, DNA sequencing and microscopy. In total, eight of 14 (57%) proximal bone margins had no growth by conventional culture but were identified in all proximal bone specimens by DNA sequencing. Proximal margins had lower median total microbial counts than infected specimens, but these differences were not statistically significant. Pathogens identified by sequencing in infected specimens were identified in proximal margins and the microbiomes were similar (ANOSIM = 0.02, p = 0.59). Using a combination of SEM and/or PNA-FISH, we visualized the presence of microorganisms in infected bone specimens and their corresponding proximal margins of seven patients (50%) with DFO. We identify that bacteria can still reside in what seems to be proximal 'clean' margins. The significance and implications of clinical outcomes requires further analysis from a larger sample size that incorporates differences in surgical and post-operative approaches, correlating any outcomes back to culture-sequence findings.
© 2019 APMIS. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA; Osteomyelitis; diabetic foot; surgical management

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31344275     DOI: 10.1111/apm.12986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  APMIS        ISSN: 0903-4641            Impact factor:   3.205


  6 in total

Review 1.  Metagenomics to Identify Pathogens in Diabetic Foot Ulcers and the Potential Impact for Clinical Care.

Authors:  Brian M Schmidt; John Erb-Downward; Piyush Ranjan; Robert Dickson
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.810

2.  Emerging Diabetic Foot Ulcer Microbiome Analysis Using Cutting Edge Technologies.

Authors:  Brian M Schmidt
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-02-12

3.  Efficacy of a topical concentrated surfactant gel on microbial communities in non-healing diabetic foot ulcers with chronic biofilm infections: A proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Matthew Malone; Michael Radzieta; Saskia Schwarzer; Slade O Jensen; Lawrence A Lavery
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Metatranscriptome sequencing identifies Escherichia are major contributors to pathogenic functions and biofilm formation in diabetes related foot osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Michael Radzieta; Matthew Malone; Mehtab Ahmad; Hugh G Dickson; Saskia Schwarzer; Slade O Jensen; Lawrence A Lavery
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 6.064

Review 5.  Surgical techniques for Bone Biopsy in Diabetic Foot Infection, and association between results and treatment duration.

Authors:  Eric Senneville; Donatienne Joulie; Nicolas Blondiaux; Olivier Robineau
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2020-06-23

Review 6.  Do Mixed-Species Biofilms Dominate in Chronic Infections?-Need for in situ Visualization of Bacterial Organization.

Authors:  Lasse Kvich; Mette Burmølle; Thomas Bjarnsholt; Mads Lichtenberg
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 5.293

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.